RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02623
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her pay date, date of rank and dates of service be corrected.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her promotion date from E-4 to E-5 is incorrect. The years of
service and pay dates reflected in her records are also
incorrect.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a technical sergeant in the Air Force Reserve.
She was discharged from the Army Reserves on 9 September 2008
and enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 21 November 2008.
In accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service and Dates of Rank, when
computing the date of rank at enlistment for airmen enlisting
into the Air Force Reserve, for an airman who is discharged from
any U.S. armed force without a military service obligation and
does not immediately enlist with the Air Force Reserve (break in
service), add the break in service with the date of rank held
while serving in the previous component by subtracting the date
of separation from the date of enlistment and adding one day.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends approval of the applicants request to
correct her date of rank and pay date. Based on the
documentation provided, the applicants date of rank should be
corrected to reflect 29 August 2003. Additionally, her pay date
should be corrected to reflect 26 July 2000 due to her break in
service.
The complete A1K evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
EXAMINERS NOTE: Pursuant to the A1K advisory, I contacted
PCARS and confirmed the applicants years of service would not
be affected by this break in service. It was also confirmed
that she has been credited for good years towards retirement
since her enlistment into Air Force Reserve in 2008.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 24 September 2012 for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took note
of the applicants complete submission, to include the
recommendation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and agree with their recommendation. The applicants service
dates should be corrected in accordance with applicable
guidelines. With regard to the applicants request to have her
service dates be corrected, it appears this issue has been
addressed by the appropriate officials and therefore no further
action is required by this Board. Therefore, we recommend that
the applicants record be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show a Date of Rank
to the grade of E-5 of 29 August 2003, rather than 15 June 2003;
with a pay date of 26 July 2000, rather than 23 July 2000.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02623 in Executive Session on 8 May 2013, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Vice Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02623 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jun 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, 18 Sep 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, 24 Sep 12.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00925
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00925 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. When she inquired about her pay date, she was told it would be the date (19 Apr 00) she joined the Air Force. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05059
She had a break in service from 4 Nov 10 until 14 Jan 11, at which time she reenlisted in the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicants correct...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02003
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02003 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As for her request for a copy of her DD Form 214, AFRC/A1K forwarded a copy of the requested document to the applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03925
He was finally able to schedule a meeting with the, then, Chief of the Air Force Reserve, on or about 18 May 2011 to attempt to have the decision reversed. Although an AGR personnel brief dated 8 April 2009, and the applicant's AGR Review Board Worksheet for the March 2011 Board reflected that he had attained career status, this data was incorrect at the time of the AGR Review Board in question. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03023
Other relevant facts are contained in the Air Force evaluation prepared by HQ AFRC/A1K, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K recommends disapproval and states the case should be closed administratively since this is a command policy issue and there has been no violation of command policy. The complete HQ AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01051
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01051 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be paid Incapacitation Pay, in behalf of her late husband, for the period 1 October 2009 through 13 January 2010. We note the Air Force offices of primary responsibility recommend granting the decedents widow incapacitation pay for the requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04469
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04469 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid $20,000.00 bonus over the course of 3 years as stated in his agreement. At the time of his enlistment, the applicant was eligible for the $7,500.00 bonus for his 3 year enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639
There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicants request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00436
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank of master sergeant (E-7) be reinstated with her original date of rank of 1 January 2008. The discharge board that convened on 27 January 2011 found the applicant did not wrongfully use marijuana and recommended she be retained in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02444
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends the applicants record be corrected to reflect he requested and received a reserve commission and transferred to the IRR when he separated from active duty. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ARPC/DPA recommends approval,...