Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01051
Original file (BC-2010-01051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01051 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

She be paid Incapacitation Pay, in behalf of her late husband, 
for the period 1 October 2009 through 13 January 2010. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her late husband was ill and had a disease; therefore, he should 
have never been released from active duty orders on 30 September 
2009 until a Line of Duty (LOD) determination was accomplished. 
Based on his diagnosed disease, he should have been continued on 
active duty orders with pay, or given incapacitation pay for the 
period of time he was unable to work until his death. 

 

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her 
late husband’s active duty orders, a medical memorandum, physical 
profile, Informal LOD, Death Certificate, and a statement of his 
civilian gross earnings. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to the Military Personnel System, the applicant served 
in the Air Force Reserve with a paydate of 27 March 1986. He was 
progressively promoted to the rank of master sergeant with a date 
of rank of 1 June 2007. His Point Service History closing on 
27 March 2009 reflects he had 19 years of satisfactory Federal 
service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s 
service history, are contained in the Air Force evaluations at 
Exhibits B and C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFRC/SGP recommends approval. SGP states the decedent was on 
active duty orders from 13 April 2009 through 30 September 2009. 
During this time period, he developed numerous symptoms 
associated with adrenal carcinoma. No definite diagnosis was 
made prior to the end of his orders. After his release from 
active duty, he continued medical care and, on 23 December 2009, 
a 7-8 centimeter adrenal mass was noted. An LOD determination 
was initiated on 4 January 2010 and completed with a finding of 
in the line of duty (ILOD) on 14 January 2010. Though the 
decedent was not in a duty status when the condition was 
diagnosed, based on symptoms, incubation period, and extensive 
duty history in both 2008 and 2009, it was determined the 
condition most likely was service connected. The decedent was 
returned to active duty orders on 14 January 2010 and remained in 
such status until his death on 29 January 2010. It is clear the 
decedent was suffering from a severely debilitating condition 
that was service connected and rendered him unfit for military 
duty during the period being requested. 

 

SGP indicates that in accordance with Department of Defense 
Instruction 124.2, Reserve Component Incapacitation System 
Management, the decedent should have been retained on medical 
continuation orders. However, due to the complicated nature and 
sudden onset of his condition, the LOD initiation that triggers 
these benefits was delayed until after his initial release from 
active duty. 

 

The complete SGP evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

AFRC/A1K recommends approval. A1K states that after a 
comprehensive review of the available documentation, they 
recommend the decedent’s spouse receive incapacitation pay for 
the period 1 October 2009 through 13 January 2010. 

 

The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 6 August 2010 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 


 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice with respect to the 
applicant’s request to extend her late husband’s active duty 
orders. The applicant was released from active duty prior to the 
finding that his condition which, subsequently resulted in his 
death, was found to be ILOD. Once his condition was determined 
to be ILOD, he was returned to active duty until his death on 
29 January 2010. We note the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility recommend granting the decedent’s widow 
incapacitation pay for the requested period; however, we believe 
it is more appropriate to correct the record to show the decedent 
was not released from active duty on 30 September 2009, but was 
continued on active duty through 13 January 2010. It is our 
understanding that the award of back pay and allowances would be 
subject to reduction of earned civilian income for the period 
1 October 2009 through 13 January 2010. Based on the foregoing, 
it is our opinion the decedent’s record should be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that Reserve Order 
Number D-01983, dated 28 April 2009, be amended in Block 15, Release Date, to reflect 20100113 rather than 20090930. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2009-04636 in Executive Session on 10 November 2010 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-
2010-01051 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Mar 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRC/SGP, dated 23 Apr 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/A1K, dated 16 Jul 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Aug 10. 

 

 

 

 

Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03777

    Original file (BC-2010-03777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03777 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02344

    Original file (BC-2011-02344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Examiners note: According to the governing SAF/AA policy letter dated 8 December 2006, (Exhibit B) entitlement to medical continuation orders begins when the condition renders the member unable to perform military duty not when the injury occurred or when the airman was released from active duty. The applicant was not continued on active duty or placed on medical continuation orders until 16 June 2011 after completion of the LOD determination. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03938

    Original file (BC-2010-03938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a member of the Air Force Reserve and was on active duty orders from 13 Oct 09 to 9 Jun 10. The supporting Reserve Medical Unit (RMU) was not notified of this until Apr 10; therefore, no LOD determination or profile action was taken prior her being placed on long term orders. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02185

    Original file (BC-2011-02185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFRC/SGP opines the applicant met the requirements for retention on active duty orders for the period of 1 October 2010 to 20 January 2011, based on a 20 January 2011 medical evaluation, rendered by a Family Practice Physician, which indicated that he was having no problems and was cleared for duty. However, based on the comments of the orthopedic physician, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to warrant his continuance on active duty orders until 5 October 2011. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03472

    Original file (BC-2010-03472.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It was recommended she be allowed to retire on her established retirement date of 19 Aug 09. e. On 14 Sep 09, AFRC/A1 notified the RMG that since the applicant is currently retired that she would need to file for incapacitation pay with the AFBCMR. The complete AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/JA and AFRC/SG did not and are not practicing due diligence with regard...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04572

    Original file (BC-2010-04572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04572 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears as though the applicant is requesting that her lower back pain condition be determined to be in the line of duty (LOD). She had five such determinations completed. Therefore, in view of the AFBCMR Medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03639

    Original file (BC-2012-03639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of a Command Man-Day Allocation System (CMAS) request for MEDCON during any time the applicant was on AD orders or prior to his retirement date of 1 Jun 12. While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the applicant’s request, the evidence reflects the applicant was treated for a medical condition in Dec 11 and, contrary to the AF Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination, dated Mar 12, wherein the military medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04084

    Original file (BC 2013 04084.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her AF IMT 348, Line of Duty Determination, report of medical evaluation letter dated 29 November 2005, statements of earned civilian income, and email correspondence pertaining to her INCAP pay application. The Air Force office of primary responsibility reviewed her request and determined that she had not exhausted her administrative remedies for requesting incapacitation pay in accordance with AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00063

    Original file (BC-2010-00063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement, and copies of Reserve Order D-14019, a heart consultant’s diagnosis, Post Deployment Health Assessment, active duty orders, Line Of Duty (LOD) determination, Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) orders, electronic communications, and several tax returns. The evaluation did not reveal a definite diagnosis which warranted an LOD determination; therefore, the applicant was released from active duty orders as fit for duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05366

    Original file (BC 2013 05366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force members must meet the medical standards and applicable Reserve medical guidance to be considered medically qualified to participate in any pay or point gaining activity In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2254, Volume 1, Reserve Personnel Participation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for...