DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00164
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her AF Form 3538, Retention Recommendation Form (RRF), which
met the 19 Sep 11 L0311E Reduction in Force (RIF) board be revised
to include two changes:
a. Her duty title should have been “Current Flight Operations
Flight CC and T6 IP” instead of “Wing Programmer and T-6
Instructor Pilot” - administratively corrected.
b. The push date, in Section III of the RRF, for in-residence
PDE be removed from the RRF.
2. She be considered by the Special Selection Board (SSB) for the
L0311E (9 Sep 11) Reduction-in-Force Board – administratively
corrected.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She had completed in-residence PDE prior to the 19 Sep 11 board,
which then made the push line on the RRF inaccurate.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her
Active Duty Officer DVB, a certificate of showing she graduated
Squadron Officer School in residence on 26 Aug 11, the letter of
notification of her non-retention, a copy of her AF Form 3538,
with attachments.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant graduated from Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) on
4 Nov 05 and graduated from her follow-on pilot training on 11 Aug
06. She received an AF Form 3538 Retention Recommendation Form
(RRF) in conjunction with the 19 Sep 11 (L0311E) Reduction in
Force (RIF) Board, which she met and was not selected for
retention in the active duty Air Force.
As a result of her non-selection for retention, the Secretary of
the Air Force directed her mandatory date of separation (MSD) be
established as 1 Mar 12.
AFPC/DPSOO granted the applicant’s request for SSB consideration
to include her duty title as corrected to “Current Operations
Flight CC and T-6 Instructor Pilot.”
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID found in the applicant’s favor with regard to her
contention the duty title on the RRF was not correct. DPSID has
since administratively corrected the duty title on the RRF to the
correct title and has ordered that she meet an SSB.
With regard to her contention that the Professional Military
Education (PME) push line does not show that she completed PDE
prior to the RIF Board convening date, DPSID states the senior
rater who completed the RRF included accurate information at the
time he signed the RRF.
If the applicant requires a change to her PDE push line, she must
provide the completed signed substitute RRF with all needed
documentation justifying the request. As she has failed to
provide a substitute RRF containing the senior rater’s intent to
change the contested push line, DPSID recommends denial of her
request.
DPSID’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 30 May 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
2
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief beyond that
already granted administratively is not warranted. Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2012-00164 in Executive Session on 16 Oct 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 17 Apr 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 12.
Panel Chair
Panel Chair
Member
Member
3
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01358
__________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who was considered and not selected for retention by the CY10A Lt Col SERB. The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicant military service records are contained in the evaluations by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits B and C. __________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02359
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her Officer Selection Brief (OSB) used during the CY02A board was in error in that an erroneous date of separation (DOS) was present; that the error was discovered by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) after she was not selected for promotion; and, that her record was considered by an SSB on 6 May 02 with this correction made, but with no opportunity for her to examine the record for other errors...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03956
________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial of the applicants request to reaccomplish his 10 Jun 06 OPR, his 15 Dec 06 OPR, and his RRF for the L9907B/1C881 Force Shaping Board. However, giving the applicant the benefit of the doubt, and if directed by the AFBCMR, they would agree to changing the word shows to showed, on the Dec 06 OPR; however, whether the change is made or not, it does not make the report...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00511
An Air Force advisor was used on all of the applicant’s reports. The applicant also notes that his senior rater also said in a letter, dated 3 Dec 04, he was not provided with guidance on the importance of stratification and PME statements in Air Force OPRs. Since both the applicant’s rater and senior rater have indicated they would have written the contested OPRs differently had they been aware of unique Air Force requirements on “PME push” and stratification, the majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00511
An Air Force advisor was used on all of the applicant’s reports. The applicant also notes that his senior rater also said in a letter, dated 3 Dec 04, he was not provided with guidance on the importance of stratification and PME statements in Air Force OPRs. Since both the applicant’s rater and senior rater have indicated they would have written the contested OPRs differently had they been aware of unique Air Force requirements on “PME push” and stratification, the majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03048
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03048 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for retention by the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Reduction in Force (RIF) Board. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01656
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRF recommends denial. The complete DPPRF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02765
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02765 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to include his current duty title of “Chief, Wing Codes Training”, the year of completion and school name for his Bachelor's degree, and his Air Force Achievement Medal...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01396
1 The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B thru C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to substitute his contested PRF with the revised PRF. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01772
In support, the applicant provides a reaccomplished RRF and a statement from her senior rater, the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff (HQ USAF/CVA), who requests the contested RRF be replaced with the reaccomplished form including the WHSA duty information. The AF/CVA Protocol Office indicated the applicant “no longer worked there,” was on terminal leave, and had been selected for the WHSA position after the CY06A FSB convened. HQ AFPC/DPPRF noted the applicant’s submission did not indicate...