Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04393
Original file (BC-2009-04393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           .RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2009-04393
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

__________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR).

__________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

According to the Air Force Personnel Center  Factsheet,  effective  Dec  86,
the AFTR is authorized to anyone who served on  active  duty  regardless  of
initial accession training completion date.

In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his DD Form  214,
Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or  Discharge,  Special
Order (SO) 21, his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record (page 2), and  his  DPM
Form 45, Retirement Order.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

__________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 31 Aug 72, the applicant retired from military  service.   He  served  20
years and 1 month on active duty.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted  from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the  letter  prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.

__________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial.  DPSIDR states the AFTR was authorized  on
12 Oct 80 and is awarded to Air Force service members who completed  initial
accession training after 14 Aug 74.  In Dec 86, the  criteria  expanded  and
authorized the ribbon to anyone who was serving on active duty  in  Dec  86,
regardless of when they completed initial accession training.

DPSIDR notes the applicant retired from  active  duty  on  31  Aug  72.   In
addition, he was not serving on active duty in Dec 86 when  the  eligibility
for the AFTR was made retroactive.

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

__________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16  Apr
10, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this  date,  this  office
has received no response (Exhibit D).

__________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.


3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant’s
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sough in this application.

__________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

__________________________________________________________________

The following members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  BC-2009-04393  in
Executive Session on 17 Nov 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Dec 09, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 26 Mar 10.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Apr 10.




                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00180

    Original file (BC-2012-00180.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Special Order GB-821, a Citation for the AFOUA, an AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, and information concerning eligibility for the AFTR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05446

    Original file (BC 2013 05446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05446 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Overseas Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR), United Nations Service Ribbon, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), Cold War Medal, and the Cuban Missile Crisis Medal. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01864

    Original file (BC-2011-01864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records they were unable to verify that he served on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from Apr 72 to Aug 72. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02691

    Original file (BC 2013 02691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02691 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED FORMER MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His deceased father’s record be corrected to reflect he was retroactively awarded the following awards: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02775

    Original file (BC-2008-02775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of either an error or an injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 10 Sep 08. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 08.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00746

    Original file (BC 2009 00746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is eligible for the VSM because in 1996 the inclusive dates for award of the VSM were updated to include the dates 29-30 Apr 75 and he was stationed in Thailand from 6 Apr 74 to 28 May 75. DPSIDR states the VSM is awarded to service members who between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspaces, thereof, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam and if on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01560

    Original file (BC-2008-01560.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01560 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal (DSM), Airman’s Medal (AM), Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) and the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03583

    Original file (BC-2011-03583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03583 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), first oak leaf cluster, be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02211

    Original file (BC-2010-02211.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, Executive Order 12276 awarded the NDSM to all service members on active duty from 2 Aug 90 to 30 Nov 95 who were discharged under honorable conditions. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: The applicant states the official character of his discharge is general, under honorable conditions and he served within the dates specified for the award. He was also...