Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03615
Original file (BC-2010-03615.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-03615

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or discharge from  Active  Duty,  be
updated to reflect award  of  the  Small  Arms  Expert  Marksmanship  Ribbon
(SAEMR).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While in basic military training he qualified as expert on the firing  range
with the rifle.

The evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to  this  application  are  contained  in  the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the  Air  Force.   Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIDR reviewed this application and recommends denial.  DPSIDR,  after
reviewing his request and military personnel records, found no  evidence  to
verify his entitlement to the SAEMR.  A complete copy of the  evaluation  is
at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a  response  which  is
attached at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After   careful   consideration   of
applicant's  request  and  the  available  evidence  of  record,   we   find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to  warrant  corrective  action.
The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based  on
the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted  by  applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights  to  which  entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were
not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2010-
03615 in Executive Session on 10 Mar 11, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Sep 10, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 8 Dec 10.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 11.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, undated





                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04285

    Original file (BC-2010-04285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record be corrected to reflect service in Vietman. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 February 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant's complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02217

    Original file (BC-2010-02217.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 6 Aug 70, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force at the completion of his required active service. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03366

    Original file (BC-2010-03366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03366 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His entitlement to the requested corrections can be verified by reviewing his official military personnel file. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03469

    Original file (BC-2011-03469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03469 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated to add the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). He does not provide any supporting documentation. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-03485

    Original file (BC-2006-03485.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03485 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflect award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01005

    Original file (BC-2009-01005.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01005 INDEX CODE: 107.00 ----------- COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), a Vietnam Service Award, and any other awards that he earned and did not receive. In view of this, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00460

    Original file (BC-2008-00460.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After separating from the Air Force he was not issued a DD Form 214. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the SAEMR. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 March 2008.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02508

    Original file (BC-2010-02508.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s requests for the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Unit Citation, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00785

    Original file (BC-2010-00785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00785 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was awarded: a. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant's complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the SAEMR. As such,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01185

    Original file (BC-2009-01185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence, that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the VSM, SAEMR or AFTR.