Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03922
Original file (BC-2010-03922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03922 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the 
following awards and decorations: 

 

1. Air and Space Campaign Medal (ASCM). 

 

2. Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR). 

 

3. Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) (administratively 
corrected). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He is entitled to these decorations as they were approved after 
his discharge, but retroactively awarded for specific operations 
and service which he performed. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, enlisted performance reports (EPR), contingency/exercise/ 
deployment (CED) orders, award certificates and orders, and 
documentation related to his disability discharge. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted 
in the Regular Air Force on 30 May 91 and was progressively 
promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), effective and 
with a date of rank of 21 Nov 00. On 14 Jun 01, he was relieved 
from active duty and transferred to the temporary disability 
retired list (TDRL), effective 15 Jun 01, and was credited with 
10 years and 15 days of total active service. On 5 Nov 02, he 


was removed from the TDRL and discharged with entitlement to 
disability severance pay. 

 

On 1 Feb 10, AFPC/DPSIDR notified the applicant of their 
determination of his entitlement to the KDSM and their action to 
administratively correct his records. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the 
ASCM and AFESR, indicating there is no evidence of an error or 
injustice. The AFESR is awarded to Air Force members who 
complete a contingency deployment after 1 Oct 99. While the 
applicant did perform what would be a qualifying deployment to 
Taszar, Hungary, the deployment took place in 1996, well before 
the AFESR was established and eligibility was not made 
retroactive. The ASCM is awarded to Air Force members who, 
after 24 Mar 99, participated in, or directly supported, a 
significant US military operation designated by the Chief of 
Staff of the Air Force. The medal is awarded only to personnel 
who provided direct support of combat operations from outside 
the geographic area of operations as determined by the Joint 
Chiefs of Staff. Service members must be assigned or attached 
to a unit engaged in the operation and personnel must be engaged 
in direct support for at least 30 consecutive or 60 
nonconsecutive days. If at home station, members must perform 
functions or missions that historically were deployed forward, 
or are entirely new or future missions, which due to 
technological advances, are no longer constrained by geographic 
location. This includes but is not limited to, sortie 
generation, intelligence, surveillance, targeting, computer 
network attack operations, etc. No documentation was located or 
provided to verify the applicant was deployed in direct support 
of Operation ALLIED FORCE. Additionally, the applicant was 
assigned normal duties in Turkey during this operation and 
therefore is not eligible for the ASCM under the provisions 
related to direct support from home station. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 18 Feb 11 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the 
applicant’s request for the Air and Space Campaign Medal (ASCM) 
and Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR). We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s 
eligibility for the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and his 
records have been administratively corrected. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis for us to 
recommend granting the applicant’s remaining requests. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-03922 in Executive Session on 6 Jul 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-03922 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Oct 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 7 Feb 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Feb 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03922

    Original file (BC-2010-03922.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The ASCM is awarded to Air Force members who, after 24 Mar 99, participated in, or directly supported, a significant US military operation designated by the Chief of Staff of the Air Force. No documentation was located or provided to verify the applicant was deployed in direct support of Operation ALLIED FORCE.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00257

    Original file (BC-2010-00257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00257 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR), the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border (AFESR w/GB),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00577

    Original file (BC-2010-00577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00577 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the following: 1. The ASCM may be awarded to members of the Air Force who, after 24 Mar 99, supported a significant US military operation designated by the Chief of Staff of the Air Force as qualifying for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01792

    Original file (BC 2014 01792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a review of the applicant’s personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicant’s deployment in question meets...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03527

    Original file (BC 2014 03527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Only those members of the Armed Forces of the United States who were present at the time and directly participated in the service or achievement for 30 days or more or for the period cited if...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01860

    Original file (BC-2009-01860.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM) 3. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SWASM and the AFSM. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05352

    Original file (BC 2012 05352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As for his request related to the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM), we note the applicant has not provided any evidence of actions on his part to obtain the relief he seeks through the proper administrative channels for award of the AFACM. We further note that AFPC/DPSID has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Global War On Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E), Global War On Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S), Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM), and Air Force Expeditionary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01955

    Original file (BC 2013 01955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01955 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03311

    Original file (BC-2007-03311.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03311 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Gallant Unit Citation (GUC), Air Force Organizational Excellence Award (AFOEA) with one oak leaf cluster (1OLC), and the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR). He states he was assigned to the Warrior Preparation Center for 179 days until...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02893

    Original file (BC 2014 02893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a review of the applicant’s personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicant’s deployment to Iraq...