Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02208
Original file (BC-2010-02208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02208 

 INDEX CODE: 107.00 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect award of the following: 

 

 1. The National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (administratively corrected) and, 

 

 2. The Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His unit was awarded these medals during his enlistment. The 
award of the medals was authorized after his discharge. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s records reflect he served on active duty from 
24 Feb 78 to 22 Oct 90. 

 

On 20 Aug 10, AFPC/DPSIDR notified the applicant that his 
entitlement to the NDSM was verified and his records will be 
updated accordingly. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award of the SWASM. DPSIDR 
states that after a review of the applicant’s records, they were 
unable to locate official documentation that reflects he served 
in any of the areas of eligibility (AOE) for award of the SWASM. 
Furthermore, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) 
confirmed the applicant is not listed as having served in the AOE 


and did not receive Hostile Fire Pay and Imminent Danger Pay for 
service in connection to award of the SWASM. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 24 Sep 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with regard to 
the applicant’s request for the SWASM. In this respect, the 
applicant has not provided any documentary evidence to 
substantiate his claim that he meets the criteria for this award; 
therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief beyond that 
granted administratively is not warranted. Therefore, we find no 
basis to favorably consider this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-02208 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 May 10, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 17 Aug 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Sep 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02310

    Original file (BC-2008-02310.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPSIDR’s complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 25 Jul 08, for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02211

    Original file (BC-2010-02211.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, Executive Order 12276 awarded the NDSM to all service members on active duty from 2 Aug 90 to 30 Nov 95 who were discharged under honorable conditions. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: The applicant states the official character of his discharge is general, under honorable conditions and he served within the dates specified for the award. He was also...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02737

    Original file (BC-2010-02737.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP notes a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence to substantiate any foreign service in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. DPSIDR states there was no documentation located in the applicant military personnel records to reflect he served in support of Operation DESERT SHEILD/STORM. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Oct 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04799

    Original file (BC-2011-04799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) is awarded to Service members that must have been permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that operated within the area or eligibility (AOE) for 30 consecutive days or for 60 non-consecutive days on or after 19 Mar 03 to a future date to be determined (TBD) by the Secretary of Defense. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04168

    Original file (BC-2010-04168.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the documentation submitted and the applicant’s military records do not support he served in Saudi Arabia. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Feb 11, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03914

    Original file (BC-2010-03914.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03914 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, for his deployment to the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia in 1990. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02509

    Original file (BC-2007-02509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02509 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 FEB 09 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal first Oak Leaf Cluster (1 OLC), Air Force Commendation Medal (3 OLC) with Valor, the Kosovo Campaign Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01555

    Original file (BC-2010-01555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01555 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01985

    Original file (BC-2008-01985.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The KDSM is a new award and he should receive one for his time served during the period of Sep 98 through Sep 99. He was stationed in Turkey from Sep 96 through Sep 98 and should receive the SWASM for his service during that time. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 30 Oct 08, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04195

    Original file (BC-2010-04195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, documentation was found showing he received numerous counselings, Letters of Reprimands, a referral APR, barred from reenlistment, as well as personal appearance and dormitory issues. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jan 11 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...