Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02509
Original file (BC-2007-02509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-02509
                       INDEX CODE:  107.00
                       COUNSEL:  NONE

                       HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  10 FEB 09

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he  was  awarded  the  Meritorious
Service Medal first Oak Leaf Cluster (1 OLC), Air  Force  Commendation
Medal (3 OLC)  with  Valor,  the  Kosovo  Campaign  Medal  (KCM),  the
Afghanistan  Campaign  Medal  (ACM),  the  Global  War  on   Terrorism
Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E) and the Air Force  Expeditionary  Service
Ribbon with Gold Border (AFESR w/GB).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received these awards after he retired.  The  campaign  medals  and
ribbons were announced after his retirement.

In support of his appeal, applicant  submitted  copies  of  his  award
certificates,  special  orders,  e-mail  communiqué,  AF   IMT   3994,
Recommendation for Decoration  Deployment/Contingency  Operations  and
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served on active duty from 19 Aug 82 through  31 May 05.
He served in Saudi Arabia from 22  Jan  03  through  19 May  03.   The
applicant retired on 1 Jun 05.  He served on active duty for 22 years,
9 months and 15 days.

On 31 Aug 07, AFPC/DPSIDR notified the applicant that his  eligibility
for the MSM (1 OLC), AFCM w/V (3 OLC), GWOT-E,  AFESR  w/GB,  and  the
Global War on Terrorism Service Medal had been
verified and his records will be updated to reflect the awards.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denying the applicant’s request for award of
the ACM and KCM.  The KCM is awarded to service members  participating
or in direct support of Kosovo operations within established areas  of
eligibility (AOE).  Service members are authorized the KCM  in  direct
support of the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive  days
in the AOE.  No official  documentation  was  located  to  verify  the
applicant’s eligibility for the KCM.

Service members are eligible for the ACM  if  they  were  assigned  or
attached to a unit participating in Operation Enduring Freedom for  30
consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days  in  Afghanistan.   No  official
documentation was located to verify the applicant’s  participation  in
Afghanistan.

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  14
Sep 07, for review and response within 30 days.  As of this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of  the  Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing,  we  find
no compelling basis upon which to recommend the requested relief other
than that which has been administratively accomplished.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-02509 in Executive Session on 8 Nov 07, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member
                 Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Jul 07, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 31 Aug 07.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Sep 07.




                             LAURENCE M. GRONER
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05352

    Original file (BC 2012 05352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As for his request related to the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM), we note the applicant has not provided any evidence of actions on his part to obtain the relief he seeks through the proper administrative channels for award of the AFACM. We further note that AFPC/DPSID has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Global War On Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E), Global War On Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S), Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM), and Air Force Expeditionary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03338

    Original file (BC 2007 03338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the individual is eligible for the award of the ACM or ICM. The applicant did not provide any documentary evidence to substantiate that he is eligible for the ACM or ICM or, that he was recommended for these awards.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00257

    Original file (BC-2010-00257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00257 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR), the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border (AFESR w/GB),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05085

    Original file (BC-2011-05085.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05085 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following awards: a. Only one award of the GWOT-E is authorized for serving in OEF/OIF, regardless of how many times an individual returns to serve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00802

    Original file (BC-2009-00802.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant served on active duty with the Regular Air Force from 18 Jun 02 to 18 Dec 04. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the ACM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and it appears his record has been corrected to indicate award of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05099

    Original file (BC 2013 05099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not awarded the ACM for the time he served in Pakistan in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02893

    Original file (BC 2014 02893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a review of the applicant’s personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicant’s deployment to Iraq...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01792

    Original file (BC 2014 01792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a review of the applicant’s personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicant’s deployment in question meets...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02701

    Original file (BC 2014 02701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect award of any other applicable medals and certificates based on his time of service. The applicant has not provided supporting documentation to show that he was deployed and participated in a “designated area” for 30 days consecutive or 60 days nonconsecutive in order to be awarded the ACM and ICM. The applicant is requesting any other applicable medals and certificates but without supporting documentation to show what acts were performed at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02287

    Original file (BC-2005-02287.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02287 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect receipt of the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (AGCM), the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S) and the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Personnel must...