Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04799
Original file (BC-2011-04799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04799 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded campaign 
medals for Bosnia, Iraq I and Iraq II. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While working for the American Forces Network he was authorized 
to wear campaign medals for the conflicts in Bosnia and Iraq. He 
needs his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from 
Active Duty, updated in order to qualify for additional tuition 
assistance from the State of New York. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects he served on active duty 
from 24 Jun 83 to 31 Jan 05. On 1 Feb 05, he retired for length 
of service and was credited with 21 years, 7 months, and 7 days 
of total active service, which includes 20 years, 2 months, and 
30 days of foreign service. 

 

The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) is awarded to members 
of the Armed Forces of the United States who after 1 Jul 58, 
participate as members of U.S. military units in a U.S. military 
operation and encounter during such participation foreign armed 
opposition, or are otherwise placed, in such position that, in 
the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, hostile action by 
foreign armed forces was imminent even though it did not 
materialize. "Direct support" is defined as services being 
supplied to the combat forces in the area of operations by ground 
units, ships, and aircraft provided it involves actually entering 
the designated area, and engaged in direct support for 
30 consecutive days in the AO. 

 

The Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) is awarded for service 
in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD or DESERT STORM (ODS) in 
one or more of the following areas from 2 Aug 90 through 


30 Nov 95: the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, 
that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 100 N. 
latitude and west 680 E. longitude, as well as the total land 
areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and 
the United Arab Emirates. Individuals serving in Israel, Egypt, 
Turkey, Syria, and Jordan (including the airspace and territorial 
waters) directly supporting combat operations from 17 Jan 91 
through 30 Nov 95 shall also be eligible for award of the medal. 

 

The Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) is awarded to Service members that 
must have been permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a 
unit that operated within the area or eligibility (AOE) for 
30 consecutive days or for 60 non-consecutive days on or after 
19 Mar 03 to a future date to be determined (TBD) by the 
Secretary of Defense. The AOE encompasses all land area of the 
country of Iraq, the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical 
miles, and all air spaces thereover. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial noting there are no campaign 
medals for Bosnia, Iraq I and Iraq II. The applicant was asked 
to provide clarification regarding which awards he was 
requesting, but did not respond. While it appears the applicant 
is requesting award of the AFEM for operations in the Former 
Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), the SWASM for OPERATION DESERT 
SHIELD/DESERT STORM, and the ICM for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, 
there was no documentation in the applicant’s submission or his 
military personnel records that indicate he was deployed to any 
location within the respective areas of eligibility (AOE). 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
6 Mar 12, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 


 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision the 
applicant was not the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis upon which to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04799 in Executive Session on 26 Jun 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 20 Jan 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Mar 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00745

    Original file (BC-2012-00745.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM while serving in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 6 January 1987 to 4 February 1991. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02737

    Original file (BC-2010-02737.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP notes a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence to substantiate any foreign service in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. DPSIDR states there was no documentation located in the applicant military personnel records to reflect he served in support of Operation DESERT SHEILD/STORM. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Oct 10.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007253

    Original file (20140007253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Forms 214, for the periods ending 2 June 1991 and 2 February 2004 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), for the period ending 2 February 2004 * a 79th Military Police (MP) Company (Combat Support) information document * a memorandum from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to the Commander, Coalition Forces Land Component Command, U.S. Army Forces Central Command, dated 11 June 2003, subject: MUC * a MUC Certificate CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02310

    Original file (BC-2008-02310.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPSIDR’s complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 25 Jul 08, for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03602

    Original file (BC-2012-03602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Although the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he served from 2 Aug 90 through 23 Feb 91, in support of Operation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01920

    Original file (BC-2008-01920.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01920 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03904

    Original file (BC 2013 03904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) certificate dated 15 Jun 1998, for Operation SOUTHERN WATCH. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01185

    Original file (BC-2011-01185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01949

    Original file (BC-2011-01949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01949 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: 1) Block 12c, Record of Service - Net Active Service this Period; to reflect 10 years, 0 months, 14 days, rather than, 9 years, 8 months, and 15 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04354

    Original file (BC-2010-04354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 Dec 10, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant they were able to verify his 4 years, 9 months, and 12 days of foreign service, which included service at Kadena AB, Japan during the period in question, and that his records would be corrected to reflect his foreign service accordingly. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...