Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01555
Original file (BC-2010-01555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01555 

 INDEX CODE: 107.00 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and the Armed Forces 
Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was stationed with the 322nd Air Division (332 AD) at Evreux, 
France, from 4 Oct 62 to 7 May 63. The 332 AD received the 
AFOUA for the period 1 Sep 62 to 15 Apr 63. 

 

He served in the United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) from 
1960 to 1963 and with some commands that he believes were in 
direct support and assistance in the Congo Airlift, Cuban 
Missile Crisis, Berlin Wall, Laos, and Vietnam. He questions 
whether he qualifies for the AFEM or any other medals. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the 
322 AD history and extracts of his military personnel records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 14 Jul 59 and was 
honorably discharged on 8 May 63. He is credited with 3 years, 
9 months, and 25 days of active service. 

 

The AFEM is awarded to member of the United States Armed Forces 
who, after 1 Jul 58, have participated in a United States 
military operation or encountered foreign armed opposition, or 
were in danger of hostile action by foreign armed forces. In 
order to be eligible for award of the AFEM the member had to 
have served on the ground in the areas of eligibility (AOE). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AFEM and state that no 
official documentation was located in the applicant’s record 
that verifies he participated in the Congo Airlift or served 
with “boots on ground” in Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis. 
However, they were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to 
the AFOUA and indicate the records will be administratively 
corrected to reflect this award. 

 

The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 30 Jul 10 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case and note his records will be administratively corrected 
to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award. 
However, with regard to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 


submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2009-01555 in Executive Session on 14 September 2010, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 7 Jul 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jul 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02420

    Original file (BC 2013 02420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02420 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02881

    Original file (BC-2005-02881.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and a response from the Air Force Historical Studies Office concerning the AFEM, and a fact sheet on the AFEM. The applicant was in the Air Force during this time period, but there is no documentation in the record to substantiate that he participated in direct support of either operation. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02809

    Original file (BC-2002-02809.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPPR states that he provided a copy of an order deploying him from Barksdale AFB on 9 Mar 59 for 90 days to APO NT 677 for a SAC rotational movement but he did not provide documentation to show the location of the deployment or that he accomplished the deployment. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with respect to his request that his Reserve time be added to his DD Form 214 and that he be awarded the Armed Forces...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201136

    Original file (0201136.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01136 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and credit for time served in Cuba [Cuban Missile Crisis (24 Oct 62 – 1 Jun 63)]. He...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05446

    Original file (BC 2013 05446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05446 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Overseas Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR), United Nations Service Ribbon, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), Cold War Medal, and the Cuban Missile Crisis Medal. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00468

    Original file (BC-2005-00468.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 00468 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUGUST 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Good Conduct Medal (GCM). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03009

    Original file (BC-2010-03009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes the incorrect date of “14 Feb 67,” in the advisory opinion, that was reflected as the date he entered active duty. We appreciate the applicant’s service to the Nation, but find he does not meet the requirement for award of the AFEM for support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00772

    Original file (BC-2008-00772.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00772 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with one Bronze Service Star (AFEM w/1BSS), the Air Force Enlisted Aircrew Badge, and the Air Force Aircraft Maintenance Occupational Badge. The applicant’s military record does...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04152

    Original file (BC 2013 04152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because of these awards during the Vietnam war period, some military personnel have been awarded both the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal & the Vietnam Service Medal. After 18 March 2003, some personnel became eligible for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, as well as the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03980

    Original file (BC-2010-03980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit B. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with regards to the applicant’s request to add Foreign Service in Guam and service during the Cuban Missile Crisis to his DD Form 214. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-03980 in Executive Session on 24 May 11, under the provisions of AFI...