RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00474
INDEX: 112.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Brunswick, Ohio to Carter, South
Dakota.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His HOR is only his place of enlistment (POE).
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on
2 Oct 07, for a period of four years and is currently serving on active
duty as an airman first class.
The applicant’s DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Force
of the United States reflects 3107 Star Dust Drive, Beavercreek, Ohio as
his HOR.
On 28 Feb 08, HQ AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide additional
documentation, such as, a South Dakota driver's license, school records,
voter registration, or tax records prior to entering active service. He
did not respond.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the HOR is defined as the
place recorded as the home of the individual at the time when enlisted,
commissioned, appointed, inducted or ordered to active duty. The HOR can
be changed only if there has been a break in service of one full day or a
bona fide error was made in recording the information given by the member.
There was no evidence found in his military records indicating his HOR was
incorrect. The applicant has not provided any documentation to
substantiate his request.
AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Apr
08, for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that has been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-
00474 in Executive Session on 16 Jul 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member
Mr. Kurt R. LaFrance, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2008-00474 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jan 08.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 3 Apr 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Apr 08.
JAY H. JORDAN
Panel Chairw
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00811
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends the requested relief be denied. AFPC/DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Apr 08, for review and comment within 30 days. After careful consideration of the circumstances of this case and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00361
AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Mar 08, for review and comment within 30 days. The Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit G. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01248
To meet retainability requirements and to complete the training, the applicant reenlisted on 27 Apr 07 in his previous AFSC of 4A151. The applicant contends his reenlistment was rushed and forced through the system with complete disregard to regulations days before he was eligible for an SRB. However, we did not find an error or injustice in establishing the requirement that he obtain the appropriate retainability.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00390
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00390 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized a Zone B, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). He enlisted in the Air Force on 15 May 01 for a period of four years. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00713
On 20 Mar 06, AFPC/DPPAE requested the applicant provide documentation to support her claim (i.e., 2002 W-2 from CA, if wages were earned any time during that year, a photocopy of CA drivers license issued before entry on active duty, or a copy of her CA vehicle registration, etc. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03166
Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00751
______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSI recommends the applicant's request for the Maintenance Badge be granted and the request for the Communications Badge be denied. His records do not support award of the Communications Badge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of his request for award of the Communications Badge and we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that no...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02851
The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOS states they support DPSOAs recommendation for approval based on the applicant not being provided the opportunity to request withdrawal of his separation request. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPSIM states commanders are the approval authority for terminal leave and do not normally allow members to return to duty after leave begins. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02906
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. After a thorough review of the applicant’s military records, DPPAE found no documentation to substantiate changing his HOR. However, his application does not convince us that the HOR currently reflected in his records was incorrectly recorded at the time he was initially ordered to active duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02419
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C, D and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...