Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02906
Original file (BC-2003-02906.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02906
            INDEX CODE:  100.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO



_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from  Holloman  AFB,  NM,  to  the
state of South Dakota (SD).
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is a resident of the state of SD.  His  driver’s  license,  voter’s
registration and license plate are from SD.

Applicant  provided  no  supporting  documentation.   The  applicant’s
complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant entered the Delayed Entry/Enlistment  Program  (DEP)  on  11
August 2001.  On 29 January 2002, he contracted his enlistment in  the
Regular Air Force in the grade of  airman  first  class  (E-3)  for  a
period of four years.  DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment  Document,
reflects Holloman AFB, NM, as his HOR.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied.  DPPAE states that
HOR is defined as the place recorded as the  home  of  the  individual
when they entered  active  duty.   After  a  thorough  review  of  the
applicant’s  military  records,  DPPAE  found  no   documentation   to
substantiate changing his HOR.  The HQ  AFPC/DPPAE  evaluation  is  at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  applicant  on  21
November 2003 for review and response.  As of this date,  no  response
has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  Applicant’s contentions are duly
noted.  However, his application does not convince  us  that  the  HOR
currently reflected in his records was  incorrectly  recorded  at  the
time he was initially ordered  to  active  duty.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of sufficient evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 14 January 2004, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                  Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Panel Chair
                  Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, Member
                  Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 03.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Nov 03.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Nov 03.




                                   ROSCOE HINTON JR.
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03087

    Original file (BC-2003-03087.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    After reviewing the evidence of record provided, the majority of the Board is of the opinion that sufficient evidence does exist to support a finding that the applicant may not have been adequately advised by her recruiter regarding her Home of Record, which could have saved her a considerable amount of money during her do-it-your-self move. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02754

    Original file (BC-2003-02754.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02754 INDEX CODE: 112.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: A constructive reenlistment to change his term of enlistment (TOE) from six to four years. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03503

    Original file (BC-2003-03503.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, his 2 September 2003 request for continuation of station allowances should have been approved because his original DEROS was curtailed from October 2004 to November 2003 due to a manning overage. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. DPAPP1 states that the applicant’s request for continuation of overseas COLA was disapproved because it was for personal reasons and for an extended period of time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03053

    Original file (BC-2003-03053.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She requested her home of record to be Chaffee MO upon enlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that her home of record at the time of his entry on active duty was Chaffee, MO, rather than Oceanside, CA. ROSCOE HINTON, JR Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-03053 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137

    Original file (BC-2003-02137.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00713

    Original file (BC-2006-00713.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Mar 06, AFPC/DPPAE requested the applicant provide documentation to support her claim (i.e., 2002 W-2 from CA, if wages were earned any time during that year, a photocopy of CA drivers license issued before entry on active duty, or a copy of her CA vehicle registration, etc. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01294

    Original file (BC-2003-01294.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that if his recommendation was approved, the applicant's separation would be characterized as honorable; however, he did recommend probation and rehabilitation. He served 11 years, 8 months and 12 days of active duty service. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00042

    Original file (BC-2004-00042.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPTR recommends the application be denied. We, therefore, agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02451

    Original file (BC-2003-02451.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 102.00 AFBCMR BC-2003-02451 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02582

    Original file (BC-2003-02582.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02582 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). On 26 August 2003, AFPC/DPPPR informed the applicant that the 23rd TFW was awarded the AFOUA for the period 1 April 1989 to 31 March...