RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02964
INDEX CODE: 128.10
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The recoupment of her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Based on the governing instruction, recoupment of her SRB is
inappropriate.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides an expanded
statement, an excerpt of AFI 36-2606, and an AF IMT 2096,
Classification/On-The-Job Training Action.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate she enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 15 Dec 99 for a period of four years in
the grade of airman basic.
On 16 May 03, she reenlisted for a period of four years and 12 months
and received a Zone A, Multiple 6, SRB for four years of continued
service. On 22 Dec 05, she was medically disqualified from her Air
Force Specialty Code (AFSC) and her Control AFSC of 1C15l was changed
to 9AOOO - Awaiting Retraining Reasons Beyond Control.
Applicant was honorably discharged on 15 Dec 06 under the provisions
of AFI 36-3208 (Miscellaneous/General Reasons). She was credited with
seven years and one day of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of full relief. They indicate that
airmen must remain technically qualified for effective performance in
the SRB skill and complete the full term of their enlistment in the
SRB skill. Recoupment of the unearned portion of the applicant’s SRB
should not be recouped, as she was removed due to medical reason. The
applicant was removed from her AFSC on 16 Mar 06 and was not
authorized the 16 May 06 SRB payment. Therefore, the Board should
deny the applicant’s request not to repay the unearned 16 May 06 SRB
annual payment. However, any other recoupment actions would be
inappropriate.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, was forwarded to
applicant on 15 Feb 08 for review and response within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Having carefully reviewed this
application, we agree with AFPC/DPSOA’s assessment that only the
unearned portion of the applicant’s SRB pertaining to the 16 May 06
payment should have been recouped. Accordingly, we recommend her
records be corrected as set forth below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 14 Dec 06, she
applied for a remission of her indebtedness of $14.823.35, incurred as
a result of the recoupment of the unearned portion of her Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), and that her request was partially approved
in the amount of $8,162.15 by competent authority; and, that she be
reimbursed any monies collected in excess of $6,661.20.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-02964 in Executive Session on 14 May 08, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Sep 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 Jan 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Feb 08.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-02964
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 14 December 2006, she
applied for a remission of her indebtedness of $14.823.35, incurred as
a result of the recoupment of the unearned portion of her Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), and that her request was partially approved
in the amount of $8,162.15 by competent authority; and, that she be
reimbursed any monies collected in excess of $6,661.20.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00055
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00055 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 Jul 07 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed to a code that does not require repayment of the unearned portion of her Selective Reenlistment Bonus...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02862
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides expanded statements, documentation pertaining to his indebtedness, previous Board decisions, and other documents associated with the matter under review. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00676
Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, 20 May 94, states that item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC code (PAFSC) and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member’s continuous active military service, and for each AFSC, the title with years and months of service. The Separation Program Designation (SPD) code issued in conjunction with his 18 June 2004 release from active duty is correct; however, a majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02885
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01814
It is his opinion that the Air Force essentially broke their contract by forcing him to cross-train, which ultimately resulted in his separation to meet the Air Force’s force reduction requirements. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. He was subsequently released from active duty for miscellaneous/general reason after it appears he voluntarily requested separation under the Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 00-00881 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JKM be changed to a code that would not require the recoupment of her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02095
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She previously filed a complaint with the Inspector General (IG) office at her base of assignment when she separated from the Air Force regarding the requirements for repayment of SRBs and has not received a response. Although the evidence indicates the policy was properly applied in her case, it appears she believes a class of Air Force personnel, i.e., those involuntarily separated for misconduct,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02194
At the time of her separation she had been disqualified from Air Traffic Control duties and had been continued on active duty awaiting waivers and Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processing. With regard to the presence of medical conditions that were potentially disqualifying for controller duties, the Medical Consultant states the fact that she decided to voluntarily separate under pregnancy provisions rather than remain on active duty and complete the planned evaluations and...