RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02885
INDEX CODE: 128.05
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The recoupment of the unearned portion of her Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) ($7583) be waived.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was told when she reenlisted that she would receive $7500;
however, she only received $4000 on 29 Apr 03. At the commander’s
call, when she agreed to take part in the force shaping program,
she was not informed that there would be a penalty for doing what
her country was asking her to do.
If she would have been told that she would have to refund the
amount of money she received, plus the amount she did not receive,
with interest and administrative fees, she would never had gone
along with this request. She gave six years of honorable service
to her country and only cooperated with the option offered under
force shaping program to help her country out.
She was not aware of the indebtedness until her taxes were
garnished in the summer of 2007.
In support of her appeal, the applicant submits a personal
statement.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit
A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 Mar 99, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. On
29 Apr 03, she reenlisted for a period of four years and 11 months,
and was paid a Zone A, Multiple 2.5 SRB, for 4 years. She was
authorized a total SRB of $17,492.99 of which she was paid
$14,577.49, in installments.
On 15 Jun 05, she was honorably released from active duty under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208. She was credited with 6 years,
2 months, and 15 days of active duty service. On 10 Mar 07, she
was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve under the
provisions of AFI 36-3209.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOS reviewed this application and recommends denial.
The applicant requested a voluntary separation to be effective
15 Jun 05 under Military Personnel Flight Memorandum (MPFM) 04-35,
Air Force Shaping Program, Phase II, specifically under the Limited
Active Duty Service Commitment (LADSC) Waiver Program. The LADSC
Waiver Program, allows enlisted personnel to either retire or
separate prior to completing specified active duty service
commitments (ADSCs) or service commitments inclusive of normal date
of separation (DOS)/expiration term of service (ETS). Attachment
2, states “Personnel who separate will do so under the
miscellaneous provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation
of Airmen, para 3.15.
The implementation guidance was posted on the HQ AFPC website and
clearly indicated at attachment 2 that recoupment of the unearned
portion of bonuses were required under the LADSC Waiver Program in
accordance with (IAW) existing AFIs and Air Force policy. In
addition, attachment 12, item 6, of the MPFM again reiterates the
requirement for recoupment of any educational assistance, special
pay or bonus money owed the government.
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation
code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required
active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a
narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.”
HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial,
stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant received a
miscellaneous discharge from the Regular Air Force under the LADSC
Waiver Program. Under the program, members sign Attachment 12 of
the Force Shaping Program guidance (MPFM 04-35), “Statement of
Understanding for Member Applying for Retirement/Separation under
the Force Shaping Program,” as part of the application process.
Item 6 of Attachment 12, notified the applicant of her obligation
to pay back the unearned portion of any bonus received.
Additionally, attachment 2 states, “Recoupment of unearned portions
of bonuses, tuition assistance or scholarships is required IAW AFIs
and Air Force policy,” under the following two headings:
Exclusions, para “b” and Waiverable ADSCs/Service Commitments,
note 3. They found that she was well aware of her obligation to
repay the unearned bonus as identified in MPFM 04-35.
HQ AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
on 21 Nov 08 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendation of the
Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. While we note the
incorrect reason for separation cited on the applicant’s
DD Form 214, we found no evidence her discharge was not in
compliance with applicable instructions or that her separation from
the Air Force was unjust or improper. The applicant’s separation
code will be administratively corrected to reflect “MND” and a
narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” Hence, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-
02885 in Executive Session on 11 February 2009, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Debra M. Czajkowski, Member
Mr. Anthony P. Reardon, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Jul 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 3 Nov 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 Nov 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Nov 08.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02862
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides expanded statements, documentation pertaining to his indebtedness, previous Board decisions, and other documents associated with the matter under review. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03541
DFAS-POCC/DE states the applicant was discharged with an SPD code of MND. The applicant asserts that he was told by his officers that he would not have to repay his SEB when he voluntarily submitted a request for separation under the LADSC Waiver Program. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02242
The applicant was honorably discharged effective 22 June 2005 with an RE code of 3A, a separation code of MND, and a narrative reason for separation of Miscellaneous/General Reasons. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. After reviewing his master personnel record along with the documentation he provided, the applicants RE code of 3A is correct, as he only completed 1 year, 1 month, and 12 days of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00676
Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, 20 May 94, states that item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC code (PAFSC) and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member’s continuous active military service, and for each AFSC, the title with years and months of service. The Separation Program Designation (SPD) code issued in conjunction with his 18 June 2004 release from active duty is correct; however, a majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02405
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors or injustices and the narrative reason for separation is correct. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 November 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Cathlynn B. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Aug 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01051
DPPRS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded to the Air Force Advisory by explaining his options for early separation from the Air Force and how he arrived at his decision to separate early. The Board notes that airmen separating under the Palace Chase program incur a service commitment double that of their remaining active duty commitment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04094
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04094 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation Pregnancy or Childbirth be changed to a medical discharge. On 20 Oct 11, in a corrected advisory, DPSOS further clarified their evaluation and stated since the applicant was not able to complete her service...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00321
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00321 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show his Separation Program Designator (SPD) code as one that reflects a separation under the Palace Chase program instead of “MND”, “Miscellaneous/General...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00067
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00067 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and separation program designator (SPD) code be reviewed. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged under Phase II of the force shaping...