ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02173
INDEX CODE: 126.04, 133.03
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his Article 15
received on 17 Nov 05 be set aside and that his former rank of staff
sergeant with the original date of rank (DOR) of 31 Jan 01 be restored, to
include back pay and High-Year of Tenure (HYT).
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant, a prior-service enlistee, was assessed in the Regular Air Force
on 31 Jan 01 in the grade of staff sergeant. On 30 Nov 04, applicant
reenlisted for a period of four years and two months in the grade of staff
sergeant.
On 25 Nov 05, he received an Article 15 for dereliction of duty for
directing a detainee to do the ISN count. His punishment consisted of a
reduction in grade to senior airman with a new DOR of 25 Nov 05 and
forfeiture of $250 pay per month for two months, which was suspended
through 24 May 06.
Applicant’s date of separation (DOS) was 31 Dec 06 as a result of his HYT
date based on the reduction in grade to senior airman. His pay date is 2
Oct 86 and his total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) is
29 May 93.
On 7 Dec 06, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
(AFBCMR) considered and denied the applicant’s request to have his Article
15 received on 17 Nov 05 set aside and that his former rank of staff
sergeant with the original DOR of 31 Jan 01 be restored, to include back
pay and High-Year of Tenure. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s case, and, the rationale for the
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.
On 13 Dec 06, the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency directed in a
similar case that the military records be corrected to show that the
nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of
Military Justice, initiated on 17 Nov 05 and imposed on 3 Dec 05, be, and
hereby is, declared void and expunged from his records, and all rights,
privileges and property of which he may have been deprived be restored.
Applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, contending that since he
and another noncommissioned officer received the same punishment by the
same people, why was the other applicant’s appeal overturned by the AFBCMR
and his was not. He was advised by his first sergeant that what happens to
one happens to both. To support this assertion, the applicant provided a
personal statement.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting a correction to the record.
After careful consideration of all of the evidence before it, the Board
found that the commander had discretionary authority to impose nonjudicial
punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, when he concluded reliable evidence
existed to indicate an offense was committed. When offered the Article 15,
applicant had an opportunity to demand trial by court-martial. However, he
chose not to pursue this avenue and accepted the Article 15 instead. By
electing to resolve the allegation in the nonjudicial forum, the applicant
placed the responsibility to decide whether he had committed the offense
with his commander. The deployed commander weighed all the evidence before
him and ultimately resolved the issue of the alleged misconduct against the
applicant. The Board noted the applicant appealed the deployed commander’s
decision and took it to next level commander; however, both commanders
ultimately denied the appeal. Nevertheless, the Board believes there may
have been mitigating circumstances that affected the applicant’s appeal
process upon returning from the AOR. In this regard, it appears that it
took an inordinate amount of time for the home station commander to
consider the applicant’s appeal for supplementary action. This inaction,
in our view, resulted in the applicant not receiving due process of his
request to have his Article 15 set aside. Therefore, to preclude any
further injustice to the applicant, we believe the applicant’s Article 15
received on 17 Nov 05 should be set aside and that his former rank of staff
sergeant with the original date of rank (DOR) of 31 Jan 01 should be
restored, to include back pay and High-Year of Tenure (HYT).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the nonjudicial punishment under
the provision of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, initiated on
17 November 2005 and imposed on 3 December 2005, be declared void and
expunged from his records, and all rights and privileges, and property of
which he may have been deprived be restored.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-20056-
02173 in Executive Session on 2 August 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 26 Dec 06,
with Exhibits.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant Reconsideration, undated.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-20056-02173
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that the
nonjudicial punishment under the provision of Article 15, Uniform
Code of Military Justice, initiated on 17 November 2005 and imposed
on 3 December 2005, be declared void and expunged from his records,
and all rights and privileges, and property of which he may have
been deprived be restored.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02173
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM addressed the applicant’s request in regards to the 25 Nov 05 Article 15 being set aside and that he be reinstated to the rank of staff sergeant with his original date of rank, 31 Jan 01; stating, in part, that the applicant’s contentions provide no legal basis for relief and has not presented evidence of a meaningful error or clear injustice in the Article 15 process, and recommended the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02844
The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00344
However, the Board decided to grant the applicant a measure of relief based on clemency and promoted him to the grade of senior airman with a DOR of 1 Oct 03, which allowed him an opportunity to test for promotion to the grade of SSgt and allow him to retire in that grade. They further note that HYT extensions are designed to address specific problems and issues, not to allow a member the opportunity to test for the next higher grade, which they believe the applicant’s request is based on. ...
His reduction in grade was suspended until 10 Dec 96, "after which time it would be remitted without further action unless sooner vacated." The evidence of record indicates that the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 for adultery. Subsequently, the successor of the commander who imposed the Article 15 punishment vacated the suspended reduction based on the applicant’s failure to obey a lawful order from the acting commander.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00903
His Article 15 received on 3 Jan 13 be set aside and Unfavorable Information File (UIF) be removed from his record. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02759
She requests the Board review the evidence presented to determine the justice of her Article 15 punishment. The evidence of record indicates the applicant's commander determined that she had committed the alleged offense of driving under the influence of alcohol, resulting in her nonjudicial punishment under Article 15. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01342-2
The AFBCMR Staff assumed the applicant was referring to his most recent case (BC-2004-02624), which was denied on 27 Dec 04, and in a letter dated 3 May 06 (Exhibit K), requested he provide copies of documents he alluded to his 14 Feb 06 submission. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the applicant’s latest submissions, a majority of the Board reconsidered his appeal but found the documentation insufficient to...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04401
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). After a thorough review of the available evidence, including the Board’s favorable consideration of two virtually identical appeals by individuals involved in the same incident for which the applicant received an Article 15, we believe sufficient doubt has been raised regarding the fairness and equity of the imposed punishment. Furthermore, since it appears the applicant’s referral EPR closing 17 Mar 06, which...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04009
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-04009 INDEX CODE: 126.04, 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15 punishment imposed upon him on 9 May 07 be removed from his records and that his rank of senior airman be restored. The commander relied upon sound evidence in determining that nonjudicial punishment was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03563
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB recommended denial noting the applicant was administratively demoted from TSgt to SrA with a DOR of 15 Jul 03. His commander also served him with a letter of reprimand (LOR), established an unfavorable information file (UIF), and his name was placed on a control roster for this conviction. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit...