RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00489
INDEX CODE: 128.05
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Aug 20, 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive the higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) which went into
effect on 1 Jun 06.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He enlisted in the Air Force on 4 May 06 with a SRB, Zone B, 1.0
Multiplier.
On 1 Jun 06, the SRB was increased to a 3.0 multiplier for the 1A2X1 career
field (Aircraft Loadmaster).
AFI 36-2606, paragraph 2.4.2 states, HQ USAF/DPRS announces SRB changes
(increases, decreases, additions, and deletions). The effective date of
increases and additions is as soon after the announcement as possible. The
effective date of decreases and deletions is at least 30 days from the
announcement date.
In support of his request, the applicant has provided a copy of extract of
AFI 36-2606, his AF IMT Form 901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD Form
4, a copy of his reenlistment documents, and a listing of SRB entitled Air
Force Specialty Codes (AFSC) in effect on 1 Jun 06.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant reenlisted on 4 May 06 for a period of 5 years and 2 months
and received a Zone B, Multiple 1.0, SRB.
On 24 May 06, HQ USAF/A1 announced SRB changes. AFPC/DPP notified all
military personnel flights (MPFs) on 26 May 06 of the announcement. The
announcement stated all increases and additions would be effective 1 Jun 06
and all decreases and deletions would be effective on 1 Jul 06.
The applicant reenlisted before the announcement date.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the request. The applicant executed a
binding reenlistment with the Air Force before the announcement of the
increase and there is no error in the contract executed. The applicant
reenlisted and received the multiple authorized at the time of his
reenlistment.
The complete evaluation of AFPC/DPPPWB, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Mar
07. As of this date, this office has not received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_______________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the Boards finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice
and recommends the application be denied.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-00489,
in Executive Session on 17 April 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Rita J. Maldonado, Member
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to deny applicant’s request. Mr.
Peterson voted to grant the applicant’s request but did not desire to
submit a minority report. The following documentary evidence was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Dec 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memo, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 20 Feb 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Mar 07.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02693
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to AFI 36-2606, paragraph 2.8., to be eligible for a Zone C SRB, airmen must complete at least 10 but no more than 14 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS) (including current enlistment and periods of active duty) on the date of reenlistment or beginning an extension of enlistment; reenlist or extend their enlistments (in one increment) in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) for at...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01150
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01150 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCTOBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03919
They recommend that the extensions executed by the applicant on 28 Sep and 28 Oct 04 be declared void and that his records be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 04, he entered into an extension for a period of 48 months, with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), Zone B, Multiple 5.5 (to be paid on the day the applicant enters the extension, provided he remains qualified). This will allow the applicant to qualify for both his assignments and, by extending the maximum of 48...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01199
AFI 36-2626, Airman Retraining Program, Attachment 8, SRB Provisions for Retraining, requires the enlistee to acknowledge understanding that if he retrains from a non-SRB skill to an SRB skill or vice-versa, he would not receive an SRB if he reenlists to obtain the retraining retainability, and if he remains eligible to reenlist, he is entitled to the SRB multiple level in effect when final approval is received. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00609
DPPAE states the applicant is not eligible to receive the SRB that was in effect when he was approved for retraining because he did not reenlist within 30 days of the notice of termination of the SRB for that career field. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he never received official notification of the requirement to reenlist within 30 days of...
The evidence of record reflects that the applicant reenlisted on 1 Dec 98. At the time of his reenlistment on 18 December 1998, he was entitled to a Zone C, Multiple 1.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with obligated service through 20 January 1999. At the time of his reenlistment on 18 December 1998, he was entitled to a Zone C, Multiple 1.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with obligated service through 20 January 1999.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03775
They indicated that the applicant contends the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) failed to provide counseling regarding a pending SRB change. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 December 2002. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 December 2002.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01733
Applicant provided an additional statement, dated 2 May 05, for the Board’s consideration, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was honorably discharged on 28 April 2004, rather than 9 May 2005, and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 April 2004, rather than 10 May 05, for a period...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03397
He graduated from technical training school on 7 April 2004, and after inquiring about reenlisting, was informed the rules had changed and he was not eligible to reenlist, because he was not within three months of his date of separation (DOS). His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E _________________________________________________________________ ADDITONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAA reviewed a similar application and provided an advisory which indicates in...