Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01858
Original file (BC-2006-01858.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01858
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  Matthew Shriver

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE:  20 DECEMBER 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he served time in Vietnam.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His six-week TDY (June-July 1965) to  Bien  Hoa  Air  Base,  Vietnam,  while
stationed in Japan, is not listed  on  his  separation  document  (DD  214).
Without proof of Vietnam service,  he  cannot  apply  for  service-connected
disability for diabetes Millitis Type II; presumed from herbicide  exposure.
 The TDY occurred 41 years ago and he no longer has copies of his orders.

No  supporting  documentation  was  submitted.   The  applicant's   complete
submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 30 September 1977, the applicant retired from  active  duty  service  and
was honorably discharged in the grade of senior  master  sergeant.   He  was
credited with 22 years and 1 month of total active service.

The applicant’s records indicate he was assigned duties in Japan Korea,  and
Thailand.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states there  are  no  documents  in
the applicant’s personnel record that verify any TDYs to Vietnam.   None  of
his Airman Performance Reports make any reference to a TDY to  Vietnam.   In
addition, the applicant indicates he has no documents that would verify  his
TDY to Vietnam.

DPAPP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In his response dated 19 Sep 06, the applicant provided a  copy  of  an  Air
Traffic Control Rating Record (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice regarding his  contentions  that  he  served
time in Vietnam.  However, after a thorough review  of  his  submission  and
the available evidence of record, we were  unable  to  find  evidence  which
substantiates  his  claim.   Although  his  military  records  show  he  was
stationed in Japan during the time in question, we  found  no  documentation
that supports his contentions that he was temporarily assigned to  Bein  Hoa
Air Base, Vietnam for six weeks.  In  the  absence  of  such  evidence,  his
request is not favorably considered.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice and that the  application  will  only
be reconsidered upon the submission of newly  discovered  relevant  evidence
not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 24 October 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Panel Chair
            Mr. James L. Sommer., Member
      Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-01858:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Jun 06.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Aug 06.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Aug 06.
      Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Rebuttal, 19 Sep 06, w/atchs.




      MICHAEL V. BARBINO
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00644

    Original file (BC-2006-00644.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, his airman performance reports (APRs) written while he was stationed at Naha Air Base, have no comments of any TDY into Vietnam. The applicant was advised in 1992 and 1997, that there were no source documents in his records that confirm a TDY into Vietnam. The AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he attached a copy of a TDY order for Cam...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02828

    Original file (BC-2006-02828.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02828 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Mar 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All ribbons, medals or awards earned while on temporary duty (TDY) in Bein Hoa AB, Vietnam, and the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) earned while stationed in Korat, Thailand, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00845

    Original file (BC-2010-00845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available records reflect the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 19 May 66 and was honorably discharged on 9 Feb 70. The complete HQ AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Sep 10 for review and comment within 30...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02494

    Original file (BC-2006-02494.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the applicant failed to respond to a request to provide documentation in support of his request. Mr. W. H., Veteran of Foreign Wars Post 4203 provided a letter dated 23 November 2006, stating the applicant’s military service started 3 July 1963 and he was released from active duty on 9 May 1967. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 8 Aug 06, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504

    Original file (BC-2010-02504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01623

    Original file (BC-2005-01623.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends granting the applicant’s request as an exception to policy. This fact is confirmed by a memo from Major General Michael J. Ingelido, USAF Retired. DPPRY states there is no evidence in the applicant’s military records that indicates he had PCS’d to Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01395

    Original file (BC-2007-01395.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01395 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect credit for a TDY to Vietnam in 1966. There are no documents in his records that support his claim that he was TDY to Vietnam. In applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01654

    Original file (BC-2006-01654.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Credit for service in Vietnam requires a member to have served (on ground or landed at least one day) in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03332

    Original file (BC-2006-03332.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although a memo from the VA states there is a document in his record that states he was recommended for the award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, no such document was found in his Master Personnel Record. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00610

    Original file (BC-2005-00610.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records do not reflect any TDY assignment locations, nor does it reflect any pay history such as hazardous duty pay for serving in a combat zone. The applicant contends he should be awarded credit for time served in Japan and Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 10 August...