Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01654
Original file (BC-2006-01654.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01654
            INDEX CODE:  100.00, 107.00

      XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  4 DEC 2007


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of
Transfer or Discharge, dated 13 Feb 72, be corrected to reflect  in
Item 30 (Remarks) Indochina and Vietnam, as “Yes” rather than “No;”
and credit for service in Vietnam.

On  15  Sep  06,  applicant’s  DD Form  214  was   administratively
corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Air Medal (AM), 1st Oak
Leaf Cluster (1OLC) and award of the Air Force  Commendation  Medal
(AFCM), the NCO Professional Military Education  Ribbon  (NCOPMER),
and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), most of which was awarded  for
support to the Air Force missions in Southeast Asia (SEA).

On 10 Oct 06, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP, advised the applicant AFM 35-5  (C1),
Separation  Documents  and  General  Separation  Procedures   dated
31 Dec 71, Table 2, Item 29, states: PCS assignment  to  Indochina,
Vietnam, or Korea on or after 5 Aug 64” you will insert  “Indochina
– Yes; Vietnam – Yes; Korea – No.”

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His records should reflect service in Indochina, U-Tapao  Thailand,
and Vietnam.  He states that his DD Form  214,  dated  13  Feb  72,
reflects his place of entry as Indochina.  While stationed  in  the
states, serving as a boom operator, he went on temporary duty (TDY)
to many bases in SEA and one stop at Da-Nang AB, Vietnam.

In support of his appeal, applicant  submitted  extracts  from  his
military personnel records, and a summary of his military service.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on  1  Sep  55  in  the
grade of  airman  basic  for  a  period  of  four  years.   He  was
progressively promoted to the rank of technical  sergeant  with  an
effective date and date of  rank  of  1  Mar  68.   On  1  Sep  75,
applicant  was  honorably  retired  from  active  duty  under   the
provisions of AFM 35-7.  He was credited with 20  years  of  active
duty service.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP reviewed this  application  and  recommended  denial.
Applicant’s Airman Performance Reports do indicate  he  volunteered
for an extended temporary duty (TDY) in  SEA  and  participated  in
35 combat missions in support of the Air Force commitments in  that
area; however, it does not indicate he ever landed at any  location
in  Vietnam.   No  documents  were  found  to  verify   applicant’s
eligibility for service credit in Vietnam.

HQ AFPC/DPAPP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant reiterated his original contentions and further explained
some of the missions which took  place  while  supporting  the  Air
Force in SEA.

Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.   Applicant’s  records   were
thoroughly  reviewed,  however,  no   documents   were   found   to
substantiate his eligibility for credit  for  service  in  Vietnam.
Credit for service in Vietnam requires a member to have served  (on
ground or landed at  least  one  day)  in  Vietnam.   The  personal
sacrifice the applicant contributed to his country is noted and our
decision in no way diminishes the  high  regard  we  have  for  his
service.  Should the applicant provide documentation that meets the
specific requirements of the  governing  directives,  we  would  be
willing to reconsider his petition.  In view of the above, we  find
no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought   in   this
application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2006-01654 in Executive Session on 7 December  2006,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
      Mr. Todd L. Schafer, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 May 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 18 Aug 06, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 06.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Nov 06, w/atchs.




                                   B. J. WHITE-OLSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02181

    Original file (BC-2007-02181.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02181 INDEX CODE: 113.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued 5 Jul 73, be corrected to reflect service in the Republic of Vietnam. Based on a review of the applicant’s master...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01623

    Original file (BC-2005-01623.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends granting the applicant’s request as an exception to policy. This fact is confirmed by a memo from Major General Michael J. Ingelido, USAF Retired. DPPRY states there is no evidence in the applicant’s military records that indicates he had PCS’d to Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02780

    Original file (BC-2005-02780.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02780 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 MAR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given credit for service in Vietnam, award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for service in Vietnam in Oct 69 and award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01443

    Original file (BC-2005-01443.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01443 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 03 NOV 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and award of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01722

    Original file (BC 2014 01722 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01722 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, section 30, be corrected from “Indochina-no” to “Indochina-yes”, reflecting that he served in Indochina. On 22 May 14, AFPC/DPAPP, after confirming the applicant’s foreign service time at Korat Air Base Thailand, provided him with a “boots on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01094

    Original file (BC-2008-01094.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP reviewed the applicant’s request and recommends denial as they have no documents that reflect any service in Vietnam. His DD Form 214 for the period of 3 September 1966 to 2 September 1970 reflects 5 months and 19 days of foreign service, but the only document that corresponds to this period is his APR while assigned to the 51 Armament and Electrical Maintenance Squadron, Naha AB, Okinawa. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03385

    Original file (BC-2012-03385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that the DD Form 214 was only annotated “yes” if the service member was actually assigned in either, Indochina, Vietnam or Korea. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In 1971, he received orders to Cam Ranh Bay, RVN and was assigned to the Air Force Security Service Detachment for 30- 45 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01864

    Original file (BC-2011-01864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records they were unable to verify that he served on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from Apr 72 to Aug 72. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03974

    Original file (BC-2006-03974.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPPRY evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 23 May 07, the applicant states he is not contesting the fact that he was not stationed in Vietnam on a permanent basis; however, as his records clearly indicate, he spent considerable time in Vietnam between 1969 and 1971 on temporary duty assignments. He states that while he recognizes that Air Force Manual 35-5...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00909

    Original file (BC-2008-00909.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00909 INDEX CODE: 107.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his TDY service in Southeast Asia. While the possibility exists that the applicant was TDY to Southeast...