RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03494
INDEX CODE: 112.10
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 May 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general discharge be changed to an honorable discharge with medical
disability in order to relieve him of his obligation to pay back his
enlistment bonus.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After his return from Afghanistan, he began to experience very dark
depression, which led to his excessive drinking. His excessive drinking
contributed to the incident that led to his dismissal from the Air Force.
Since his release, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) determined he
suffers from Bipolar I Disorder which they determined to be service
related. He feels he was released from active duty without proper medical
examination and analysis. Proper medical evaluation prior to his release
would have resulted in an honorable discharge with a medical disability and
relieved him of his obligation to repay his service bonus.
In support of his application, the applicant provides a statement from his
parents; a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge
From Active Duty, Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) decision on his
disability; and financial documentation concerning his enlistment bonus
recoupment. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 January 2001, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the
age of 19 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of six years.
For enlisting six years as an Aircraft Fuels Systems Apprentice, he
received an enlistment bonus in the amount of $13,000. After completing
basic training, the applicant attended the Aircraft Fuel Systems Apprentice
Course. He was progressively promoted to the rank of airman first class (E-
3) effective and with a date of rank of 1 March 2002.
On 1 May 2001, the applicant received non-judicial punishment (Article 15)
for consuming alcoholic beverages under the legal drinking age, wrongfully
entering the living quarters of a member of the opposite sex, failing to
carry his Sheppard Air Force Base Form 303, and failing to obey a lawful
order. His punishment consisted of reduction to the grade of airman with a
new date of rank of 1 May 2001, and forfeiture of $350 pay suspended until
31 October 2001. On 24 September 2001, the applicant received non-judicial
punishment (vacation of previous suspended Article 15 punishment) for
consuming and possessing alcohol while under the age of 21.
A Pre-Deployment Health Assessment conducted on 12 October 2001, indicated
the applicant’s health as “excellent.” He was deployed to Bahrain from 1
December 2001 to 31 January 2002. A Post Deployment Health Assessment
dated 20 January 2002, again reported his health as “excellent” without any
health concerns or questions.
On 16 March 2002, the applicant was arrested by civilian police for
assault, illegally entering a club, and underage consumption of alcohol.
On 27 March 2002, his commander gave the applicant a Letter of Reprimand
(LOR) for making false statements. On 29 March 2002, his commander issued
the applicant an LOR for the 16 March 2002 incident.
On 28 March 2002, the applicant was evaluated by mental health and
diagnosed with alcohol dependence. On 3 April 2002, a psychologist
characterized the applicant’s mood as “stressed,” dysthymic (depressed),
and somewhat tearful. The applicant denied suicidal or homicidal ideation
and did not manifest disturbed thoughts (symptoms of psychosis). The
psychologist did not render an additional diagnosis other than alcohol
dependence. The applicant was seen again by mental health providers for
alcohol abuse treatment on 4 April 2002 and 22 April 2002.
On 20 May 2002, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to
recommend that he be discharged because of minor disciplinary infractions,
with a general discharge. On 20 May 2002, the applicant acknowledged
receipt of his commander’s intent, waived his right to consult counsel, and
to submit statements in his own behalf. On 22 May 2002, the discharge case
file was found to be legally sufficient by the Staff Judge Advocate. On 29
May 2002, the discharge authority approved the discharge under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49 (minor disciplinary actions) and
directed the applicant be discharged without probation or rehabilitation.
The applicant was separated with a general (under honorable conditions)
discharge effective 31 May 2002 with a separation code of JKN (misconduct)
and a reentry code of 2B (discharged under general or other-than-honorable
discharge). He had served 1 year, 4 months and 28 days on active duty.
Upon separation, the applicant was subject to a bonus recoupment of
$9,942.60 for the unserved portion of his enlistment bonus contract.
DVA documentation indicates the applicant was seen by a civilian
psychiatrist beginning 12 September 2002 and given a diagnosis of attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder. Subsequently, he was hospitalized and
diagnosed with Bipolar I Disorder. A DVA decision, dated 21 July 2003,
granted the applicant service connection for Bipolar I Disorder with an
evaluation of 50 percent effective 1 June 2002; however, the DVA denied his
claim for entitlement to individual unemployability.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that there is sufficient
basis to warrant consideration of changing the applicant’s separation code
to one that does not require enlistment bonus recoupment. In addition, the
BCMR Medical Consultant’s recommends denying the applicant’s request to
change his characterization of service or to correct the applicant’s
records to show a disability discharge.
The BCMR Medical Consultant states action and disposition in this case are
proper and equitable reflecting compliance with Air Force directives that
implement the law; however, the Board may consider whether requiring
repayment of the enlistment bonus represents an injustice meriting specific
relief.
The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23
November 2005 for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice in regard to the applicant
characterization and reason for discharge. We feel the characterization
and reason for discharge which was issued at the time of the applicant’s
separation accurately reflects the circumstances of his separation and we
do not find them to be in error or unjust. Therefore, the applicant’s
requests to upgrade his discharge and to change his reason for discharge
are not favorably considered.
4. Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has been
presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice warranting some
relief. After reviewing the evidence of record, we concur with the opinion
and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant that the applicant’s
medical condition of Bipolar I Disorder may have been a contributing factor
to the applicant’s behavior which led to his discharge. Furthermore, this
belief is reinforced by the fact the Department of Veterans Affairs granted
the applicant service connected disability for his condition following his
discharge from active duty. Therefore, to resolve any possibility of an
injustice, we feel the applicant’s records should be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 May 2002, he applied for
remission of the debt arising from the unearned portion of the selective
enlistment bonus he received in conjunction with his 3 January 2001
enlistment, and his request was approved by competent authority.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 January 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2004-03494 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Nov 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 22 Nov 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Nov 05.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-03494
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 30 May 2002,
he applied for remission of the debt arising from the unearned portion of
the selective enlistment bonus he received in conjunction with his 3
January 2001 enlistment, and his request was approved by competent
authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00647 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code be changed. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was administratively separated due to an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and traits of a personality disorder. On...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02430
The BCMR Medical Consultant does not conclude that the evidence in the service medical records support change of records to show disability discharge for anxiety disorder and notes that the predominant diagnosis interfering with duty at the time was the non-compensable personality disorder. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A response to the Air Force evaluation was provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03414 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUNE 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge be changed to reflect a medical reason that would not require recoupment of his enlistment bonus. The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant’s...
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, and not the personality disorder that appears on the DD Form 214 an error that needs to be corrected. The BCMR Medical Consultant further states that the current AFI regulating separations for mental health problems does not allow coding for other than “personality disorder,” an entirely different code sequence from that with which the applicant was diagnosed. However, after reviewing all the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00533
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00533 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reentry code be changed and recoupment of the unserved portion of his enlistment bonus be waived. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to the applicant’s mental health evaluations, extracted from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01674 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed from “Pregnancy” to “Medically Disqualified not for Cause.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01241
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAES states the applicant’s reenlistment was processed without her commander’s endorsement and the Military Personnel Flight erroneously issued a $11,442.07 (before tax) SRB to applicant in July 2001. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force Evaluation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03817
The Findings and Recommended Disposition of the IPEB dated 13 August 2001 found the applicant unfit for duty and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a 10% disability rating based on the following: Category I - Unfitting Conditions that are compensable and ratable: bipolar disorder associated with post-traumatic stress disorder. The Board found his medical condition for Bipolar Disorder as unfitting for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02194
At the time of her separation she had been disqualified from Air Traffic Control duties and had been continued on active duty awaiting waivers and Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processing. With regard to the presence of medical conditions that were potentially disqualifying for controller duties, the Medical Consultant states the fact that she decided to voluntarily separate under pregnancy provisions rather than remain on active duty and complete the planned evaluations and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03661
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03291 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be set aside and she be given a disability retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The discharge she received was...