RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03414
INDEX CODE: 128.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUNE 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for discharge be changed to reflect a medical
reason that would not require recoupment of his enlistment bonus.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Since his military separation, he has been diagnosed with brain damage
believed to have been caused during his Air Force technical school
assignment.
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of pertinent
medical records from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and a
Congressional inquiry, with attachments, which includes a letter from
his parents and a 24 May 2004 statement from his psychologist. The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 20
June 2002 for a period of six years, in the grade of airman, under a
Guaranteed Training Enlistment Agreement in Security Forces, with a
$4,000.00 enlistment bonus. As part of the enlistment bonus agreement
(AF Form 3008, dated 20 June 2002), the applicant agreed to repay the
unearned portion of the bonus if he failed to fulfill his service
obligation.
On 26 March 2003, the applicant was diagnosed with an Adjustment
Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotion and Conduct, which rendered
him unsuitable for continued service.
On 27 March 2003, the applicant received notification that he was
being recommended for discharge for having a Mental Disorder. The
reason for this action was due to being diagnosed with an Adjustment
Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotion and Conduct, a condition
that renders him unsuitable for continued service in the Air Force.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and signed a
Statement of Understanding Regarding Recoupment of Education
Assistance, Special Pay or Bonuses on 27 March 2003. On 28 March
2003, he consulted military legal counsel and declined to submit any
written statements in his behalf. The wing legal office reviewed the
case and found it legally sufficient to support separation. On 31
March 2003, the discharge authority approved the recommended
separation and directed that the applicant be issued an honorable
discharge.
The applicant was honorably discharged on 4 April 2003 under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208 (personality disorder). He had completed a
total of 9 months and 14 days and was serving in the grade of airman
(E-2) at the time of discharge.
The records of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) reflect the
applicant was granted a combined disability rating of 60 percent on 8
March 2004.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be approved.
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that, although DVA documents
reflect a reported history of a significant head trauma while in-
service, review of service medical records show a single incident of a
bruised jaw sustained when he fell striking his right jaw on the butt
of his rifle. He denied any loss of consciousness and on examination
was noted to be alert and oriented. No evidence of fractured jaw or
signs or symptoms of head injury were noted. The service medical
record contains copies of civilian medical documentation of pre-
service head injuries that occurred in February 2002 and May 2002 just
prior to his entry on active duty in June 2002. Review of the service
medical record reveals an entry, dated 8 October 2002, one month prior
to hitting his jaw on his rifle, documenting symptoms of difficulty
coping with stress. The applicant experienced worsening symptoms in
January 2003 associated with alcohol abuse. Despite mental health and
alcohol abuse counseling, the applicant experienced recurrent
depressed mood and abuse of alcohol.
The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant’s discharge for
unsuitability due to a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder is subject to
recoupment of his enlistment bonus under current policy and
regulation. The applicant’s in-service problems were compounded by
his misuse of alcohol, which recurred despite participation in an
alcohol abuse counseling program. In applicant’s case, the
persistence of symptoms post-service reflects ongoing problems more
complex than simple Adjustment Disorder. Following discharge, the
applicant continued to abuse alcohol (and other drugs), experience
depressed mood and demonstrate impulsive behavior resulting in legal
problems and significant occupational instability. The applicant’s
problems are now attributed by his psychologist to brain injury from
repeated head trauma compounded by continued alcohol abuse. There is
no evidence in the service medical record of any head injury or other
illness that would result in brain injury. Thus, the applicant’s
brain condition was not caused by, or aggravated by service beyond the
natural course of the condition. His alcohol abuse is clearly a major
contributing factor to his in-service and post-service problems. In
retrospect, if, while in-service, the applicant’s mental condition had
been attributed to the pre-service head injuries, evaluation in the
disability system would have resulted in discharge without severance
pay for a disability that existed prior to service and that was not
permanently aggravated by service. When discharged for an Existed
Prior to Service (EPTS) condition without service aggravation, there
is no recoupment of enlistment bonuses.
The BCMR Medical Consultant states is of the opinion that a change of
the SPD code to one that does not require bonus recoupment is
supported by the preponderance of the medical evidence of this case.
The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 1
April 2005 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After reviewing the applicant’s
submission and the evidence of record, we are persuaded that relief is
warranted. In this respect, we are in agreement with the opinion and
recommendation of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that the unique and
complex medical aspects of this case support a change of the SPD code
to one that does not require bonus recoupment. In view of the
foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to the
extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his narrative reason
for separation, issued in conjunction with his Honorable Discharge on
4 April 2003, was “Disability, Existed Prior to Service,” that he was
issued a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “JFM.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 May 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered in connection with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03414.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Oct 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 28 Mar 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Apr 05.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-03414
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his narrative
reason for separation, issued in conjunction with his Honorable
Discharge on 4 April 2003, was “Disability, Existed Prior to Service,”
that he was issued a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of
“JFM.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02430
The BCMR Medical Consultant does not conclude that the evidence in the service medical records support change of records to show disability discharge for anxiety disorder and notes that the predominant diagnosis interfering with duty at the time was the non-compensable personality disorder. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A response to the Air Force evaluation was provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01241
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAES states the applicant’s reenlistment was processed without her commander’s endorsement and the Military Personnel Flight erroneously issued a $11,442.07 (before tax) SRB to applicant in July 2001. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force Evaluation and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00647 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code be changed. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was administratively separated due to an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and traits of a personality disorder. On...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01674 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed from “Pregnancy” to “Medically Disqualified not for Cause.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00348
Nevertheless, given the CI’s history of starting college prior to separation, employment after separation, and normal performance on tests of “intellectual abilities, memory, executive control, language, and visual-spatial functioning,” the Board agreed that the CI’s level of functioning at separation best fit the VASRD §4.130 10% criteria, “occupational and social impairment due to mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency and ability to perform occupational tasks only...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03494
On 28 March 2002, the applicant was evaluated by mental health and diagnosed with alcohol dependence. In addition, the BCMR Medical Consultant’s recommends denying the applicant’s request to change his characterization of service or to correct the applicant’s records to show a disability discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00248
Neurologic examination performed on December 3, 2004 was normal and he was ambulating without difficulty. However, the Board also noted residuals of frontal lobe injury not merely restricted to mild memory dysfunction that included problems other cognitive functions (decreased verbal processing, attention, and concentration), irritability, anger, and problems with impulse control reflected in neuropsychological testing and the initial VA mental health clinic encounter 9 months after...
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, and not the personality disorder that appears on the DD Form 214 an error that needs to be corrected. The BCMR Medical Consultant further states that the current AFI regulating separations for mental health problems does not allow coding for other than “personality disorder,” an entirely different code sequence from that with which the applicant was diagnosed. However, after reviewing all the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03093
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that a computed axial scan of the applicant’s head at the time of the accident was normal and an electroencephalogram performed 10 months later was normal, both objective evidence arguing against serious brain trauma or its residuals. The applicant has provided no persuasive evidence that he was denied due process or that the actions taken against him were inappropriate or unsupported by his own...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00623
In support of his request, applicant provided documentation extracted from his medical records. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 16 Jun 66 and referred the applicant to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) with a diagnosis of vascular headaches, severe, secondary to head trauma. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we find no evidence of an error and...