RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03541
INDEX CODE: 128.06
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 May 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code be changed to a code not
requiring him to repay his Selective Enlistment Bonus (SEB).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told he would not have to pay back his enlistment bonus.
In support of his application, the applicant submits copies of his DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a letter
from Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). The applicant’s
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 June 2003, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age
of 19 in the grade of airman basic for a period of six years. He received
an SEB entitlement of $12,000 for enlisting for a period of 72 months as a
Fuels Apprentice. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman
first class (E-3) effective 11 September 2003 with a date of rank of 18
July 2003.
The applicant was released from active duty on 15 January 2005 under the
provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, Administrative
Separation of Airmen, with an SPD Code of MND (miscellaneous/general
reasons), and an honorable characterization of service. The Military
Personnel Data System (MilPDS) indicates the applicant voluntarily
submitted a request for separation under the Limited Active Duty Service
Commitment (LADSC) Waiver Program and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 3.15. He
served 1 year, 7 months, and 13 days of active duty
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DFAS-POCC/DE recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DFAS-POCC/DE
states the applicant was discharged with an SPD code of MND. Under this
SPD, the unearned portion of the bonus is to be recouped. The applicant’s
debt was validated by the Debt Collection Branch and found to be proper and
valid. It is the opinion of DFAS-POCC/DE that based on the evidence; there
has not been an error or injustice. The DFAS-POCC/DE evaluation, with
attachments, is at Exhibit B.
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states Military Personnel Flight
Memorandum (MPFM) 04-35, states the SPD for individuals being released from
active duty under the LADSC Waiver Program will be “MND” and the narrative
reason for separation will be “miscellaneous/general reasons.” The MPFM
also gave instructions to the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) to “Ensure
all applicants applying under the Force Shaping Program sign a Statement of
Understanding. The Statement of Understanding stated “I understand that if
I retire or separate prior to completing the period of active duty I agreed
to serve for receiving education assistance, special pay, or bonus money, I
will reimburse the Air Force for a percentage of the cost involved unless
otherwise specified in this MPFM.”
DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the MilPDS and the
special order in the master personnel records, the applicant’s separation
was consistent with the procedural requirements of the discharge
regulation. The discharge was within the discretion of the separation
authority. It is the opinion of DPPRS that the applicant did not submit
any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the
separation processing. The SPD Code is correct and no corrective action is
required. The DPPRS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10
February 2006, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. The applicant asserts that he was told by
his officers that he would not have to repay his SEB when he voluntarily
submitted a request for separation under the LADSC Waiver Program. We
cannot confirm what information the applicant was told; however, we note
his records do not contain the MPF “Statement of Understanding” signed by
the applicant indicating that if he voluntarily separated under the Force
Shaping Program, he understood he would have to repay any unearned bonus
money. While the evidence indicates his discharge was in accordance with
the applicable instruction, we feel there exists the possibility that the
applicant was miscounseled. Therefore, it is the Board’s opinion that in
order to provide him fair and equitable relief, his records should be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 14 January 2005, he
applied for remission of the debt incurred for repayment of his SEB and,
his application was approved by competent authority.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 21 March 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
Ms. Debra Walker, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-03541 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Oct 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 7 Feb 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 5 Dec 05.
Exhibit D. Applicant’s rebuttal, dated 10 Feb 06.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-03541
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 14
January 2005, he applied for remission of the debt incurred for repayment
of his Selective Enlistment Bonus and, his application was approved by
competent authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00676
Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, 20 May 94, states that item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC code (PAFSC) and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member’s continuous active military service, and for each AFSC, the title with years and months of service. The Separation Program Designation (SPD) code issued in conjunction with his 18 June 2004 release from active duty is correct; however, a majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01051
DPPRS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded to the Air Force Advisory by explaining his options for early separation from the Air Force and how he arrived at his decision to separate early. The Board notes that airmen separating under the Palace Chase program incur a service commitment double that of their remaining active duty commitment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02405
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors or injustices and the narrative reason for separation is correct. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 November 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Cathlynn B. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Aug 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02885
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01504
JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXX, BC-2005-01504 I have carefully considered all the circumstances of this case and do not agree with the majority members that the applicant should not be relieved of the debt for the unearned portion of the initial enlistment bonus she received. In support of her request, the applicant submits a statement from...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02862
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides expanded statements, documentation pertaining to his indebtedness, previous Board decisions, and other documents associated with the matter under review. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00321
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00321 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show his Separation Program Designator (SPD) code as one that reflects a separation under the Palace Chase program instead of “MND”, “Miscellaneous/General...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01866
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01866 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of "MND" and narrative reason for separating be changed so he can receive his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. The specific authority through which he...