RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02202
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
A Letter of Reprimand (LOR), with an Unfavorable Information File
(UIF), dated 27 March 2001, be removed from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The LOR and UIF were inappropriately issued by the region commander
for the alleged actions. His situation was reviewed by the Air Force
Office of Special Investigation commander (AFOSI/CC) on 15 June 2001
and the commander determined there was no evidence of wrongdoing and
closed the matter. He would like to join an active Reserve unit and
contribute his skills/training.
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement,
copies of his DD Form 214, the cited AFOSI/CC letter and an Affidavit,
dated 28 February 2001. The applicant’s complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is
2 December 1994. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
captain, effective and with a date of rank of 23 August 1998.
Applicant’s Military Personnel Records (MPR) did not contain the
LOR/UIF in question.
The following is a resume of applicant’s OPR ratings subsequent to his
promotion to the grade of captain.
Period Ending Evaluation
5 Jun 99 Meets Standards
17 Sep 99 Education/Training Report
5 Jun 00 Meets Standards
6 Oct 00 Education/Training Report
5 Jun 01 (Referral) Does Not Meet Standards
On 22 June 2002, the applicant was honorably released from active duty
under the provisions of AFI 36-3207 (completion of required active
service) and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He had completed a
total of 7 years, 6 months and 20 days and was serving in the grade of
captain at the time of his separation.
Effective 8 January 2004, the applicant was assigned to the
Nonobligated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS); and, on
23 June 2004, he was reassigned to the Inactive Status List Reserve
Section (ISLRS).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPF recommends the application be denied. DPF states the
incident was investigated by a higher commander and found to be
sufficient. In addition, the LOR and UIF do not physically exist in
the applicant’s record. The UIF containing the LOR was destroyed upon
the applicant’s separation and the documents are not in his Master
Personnel Record Group (MPerRG). DPF indicates the AFOSI/CC reviewed
the report of investigation involving the applicant’s misuse of his
position as a special agent and noted the region commander
administered an LOR and UIF. The commander warned the applicant that
another incident of this or similar nature would result in more severe
disciplinary action and the matter was closed. The HQ AFPC/DPF
evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 10
September 2004 for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s complete
submission was thoroughly reviewed and his contentions were duly
noted. However, we do not find the applicant’s assertions
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the
appropriate Air Force office (HQ AFPC/DPF). Therefore, in the absence
of sufficient evidence that the overall information used as a basis
for the LOR was erroneous or that there was an abuse of discretionary
authority, we agree with the recommendation of HQ AFPC/DPF and adopt
the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either
an error or an injustice when issued the LOR and UIF. Accordingly, we
find no compelling basis to recommend removing any reference to the
LOR and UIF from his records. We note that the LOR and UIF are no
longer a part of the applicant’s record; therefore, removal of the LOR
and UIF is a moot issue.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 1 March 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-02202.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Jul 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPF, dated 1 Sep 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Sep 04.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00426
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00426 INDEX CODE: 126.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letter of Reprimand (LOR) he received on 3 Dec 04 be removed from his existing Unfavorable Information File (UIF). In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of sufficient evidence...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01358 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 126.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 14 Oct 97, and an Unfavorable Information File (UIF), dated Nov 97, be removed from her permanent records. The applicant provided copies of the 14 Oct 97 LOR, issued by her flight commander,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02843
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02843 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 121.00, 126.03, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Throughout this entire process, his case was mismanaged and mishandled as evidenced by the fact his OPR, rebuttal, PIF, and proposed Article 15 action were lost...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01567
JA states the commander carefully considered the allegation that applicant cheated on her 2000 WAPS test. If MSgt W did not provide her with the material as alleged by SrA K, how then can she be guilty of soliciting/receiving this information SrA K says he provided her through MSgt W? B. J. WHITE-OLSON Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: APPLICANT, Docket No: BC-2005-01567 I have carefully considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03522
The applicant’s argument seems to be that since the Air Force ultimately paid his claim, he did nothing to warrant an LOR or a referral OPR. First, the applicant’s commander could have found that he committed fraud when he filed his original claim with the Air Force. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 4 Jul 10, w/atchs.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Evaluation Programs Branch, AFPC/DPPPE, reviewed this application and indicated that applicant has no support from the wing commander (and additional rater on the OPR) or either of the senior raters that prepared the contested PRFs (Note: The senior rater that prepared the CY96B PRF was also the reviewer of the contested OPR). A complete copy of their evaluation, with attachments, is...
On 25 Jul 96, the applicant received a LOR for use of excessive force while apprehending another Air Force member. Commanders may also remove an enlisted member's UIF prior to the disposition/expiration date, if they feel the UIF has served its purpose. With respect to the applicant's request that the LOR, dated 25 J u l 96, and the UIF established as a result of receiving the LOR be removed from his records, we note that the UIF is destroyed within one year after the effective date and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01228
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Army of the United States (Army Air Force) on 6 Jul 42. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 9 Jul 04 for review...
Both trainee and military training instructor (MTI) accounts indicate that by the third water stop, AB S-- and other trainees were receiving assistance from fellow trainees at various times during the march. Further, it is not designed for BMT trainees, cannot be used to make a determination regarding trainee activities, and does not contain sufficient objective criteria to assess an event like the march. d. The 10 Sep 98 march followed the limited guidance then existing for the conduct of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02933
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02933 INDEX CODE: 131.02, 111.01, 111.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 Mar 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 21 Mar 05, a 6 Jul 05 Letter of Reprimand (LOR), two Letters of Counseling (LOCs) dated 7 and 8...