Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01878
Original file (BC-2004-01878.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01878
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  19 Dec 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, injury in left leg, be assessed  as
combat related in  order  to  qualify  for  compensation  under  the  Combat
Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was awarded the Purple Heart for his injury.

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air  Force  on  1
Jun 55.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  master  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  Dec  71.
He served as a Medical Services Technician.   He  voluntarily  retired  from
the Air Force on 30 Jun 75, having served 20 years and  1  month  on  active
duty.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 16 Mar 04 based upon the  fact  that
his Purple Heart injury was not rated by the DVA.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records show his Purple Heart injury is  not  rated.   Although  his
records show the injury to his left leg he received in Vietnam  resulted  in
award of the Purple Heart, he is not rated by the DVA  for  this  condition.
CRSC claims that the DVA has not recognized as service connected  cannot  be
approved.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  9  Jul
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred  as  the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the
performance  of  duty  under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through   an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, does  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01878 in Executive Session on 11 Jul 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Jun 04.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 24 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jul 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01933

    Original file (BC-2004-01933.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his duodenal ulcer, back injury, quadruple heart bypass, and tinnitus are not combat related. For duodenal ulcer to qualify for CRSC, it must be presumptive to POW internment and so stated in the applicable rating decision. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01667

    Original file (BC-2004-01667.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his service-connected conditions are not combat related. DVA files show his loss of both feet were the result of a stroke. This clearly states there is no direct cause between his Purple Heart injury to his right shoulder and his back strain.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01969

    Original file (BC-2004-01969.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application an aircraft loss record, and witness statements. He served 21 years, 2 months, and 19 days on active duty Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his post-op residuals, left knee, has not been rated by the DVA as service connected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01638

    Original file (BC-2004-01638.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01638 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Nov 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of his request for award of the Purple Heart. After a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01318

    Original file (BC-2005-01318.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement. He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 30 Jun 95, having served 20 years and 13 days on active duty. Therefore, CRSC cannot be considered until the DVA recognizes the condition as service-connected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00969

    Original file (BC-2004-00969.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00969 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Sep 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes and foot injury, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01725

    Original file (BC-2004-01725.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records and personnel files show his knee prosthesis and ankle injury are not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jul 04 and to his counsel on 28 Jun 04, for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01883

    Original file (BC-2004-01883.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his service connected conditions are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01528

    Original file (BC-2004-01528.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01528 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 NOV 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertension and right knee bone condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02547

    Original file (BC-2004-02547.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02547 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease, dermatophytosis, flat foot condition, and residuals of cold injury (both feet), be assessed as combat related in...