Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01883
Original file (BC-2004-01883.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01883
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  19 Dec 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical  conditions,  arteriosclerotic  heart  disease
and disfigurement of head, neck or face, be assessed as  combat  related  in
order  to  qualify  for  compensation  under  the  Combat  Related   Special
Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His conditions are the result of his flying duties during World War II as  a
combat pilot.  His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant was appointed a Reserve second lieutenant on 27 Jul 39 and  served
various assignments in the Air Corps Reserve, Army  of  the  United  States,
and on active duty.  He was progressively promoted to the grade of  colonel,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of  25  Mar  63.
He served as  a  pilot  aboard  transport,  tactical  bomber,  and  tactical
fighter aircraft.  On 31  Jun  65,  he  voluntarily  retired  for  years  of
service.  He served 22 years and 6 days on active duty

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 100% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 2 Jun 04 based upon  the  fact  that
his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to  be  combat-
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records  show  his  service  connected  conditions  are  not  combat
related.  His records do not show, while in service, a combat-related  event
or events that were the direct cause of his  disability.   Exposure  to  the
sun, for long periods of time is not considered  combat  related.   Although
stress can be a contributing factor to heart disease, heart  disease  cannot
be approved as combat related based on stress alone.   For  arteriosclerotic
heart disease to qualify for CRSC, it must  be  secondary  to  Agent  Orange
contracted diabetes of presumptive to POW internment and so  stated  in  the
applicable DVA rating decision.  The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  8  Oct
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01883 in Executive Session on 11 Jul 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Jun 04.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 1 Oct 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01624

    Original file (BC-2004-01624.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 100% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his arteriosclerotic heart disease is not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01072

    Original file (BC-2004-01072.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01072 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated Mandatory Case Completion Date: 3 Oct 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02547

    Original file (BC-2004-02547.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02547 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease, dermatophytosis, flat foot condition, and residuals of cold injury (both feet), be assessed as combat related in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00970

    Original file (BC-2004-00970.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, documentation extracted from his medical records and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA records does not show that his conditions are combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00323

    Original file (BC-2004-00323.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states his service medical record, DVA records and personnel records show his arteriosclerotic heart disease is not combat related. Although his training preceded the onset of the acute heart attack, heart attack is an expected consequence of the natural progression of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease that was established in the applicant prior to the training and would have occurred regardless of the period of training. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00767

    Original file (BC-2004-00767.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, his CRSC denial letter, and documents extracted from his medical and flight records. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the definite causal relationship can be found in the fact that his injury would not have occurred if he was not a crewmember, performing official duties, during ongoing combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01278

    Original file (BC-2004-01278.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement outlining his career as an Air Force officer and providing data pertaining to the studies of the effects of herbicides and Plutonium exposure; a bibliography, a physician's statement, and his CRSC denial letter. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the direct result of armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03542

    Original file (BC-2003-03542.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03542 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03571

    Original file (BC-2004-03571.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force on 8 Feb 73 and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on that same date. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04134

    Original file (BC-2003-04134.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed in a special high altitude chamber for the purpose of diagnostic and corrective adjustment at an altitude of 65,000 feet for a minimum of 15 minutes with his suit inflated. There is no relationship of this incident or flying duties to the subsequent diagnosis of his lung tumor. The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit G. ODUSD(MPP)/Comp reviewed the applicant's request and concurs with the findings and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant.