RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02866
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Item 9a, be changed
to reflect he was discharged rather than retired.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 7 July 1976 he was separated from the Air Force under retirement. He
was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 8 July 1976
through 29 March 1978 and discharged on 29 March 1978 in accordance with
Special Order Number AC-5317 by reason of physical disability.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 April 1972, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
Medical Records reveal the following:
On 19 May 1976, the applicant was evaluated by a Medical Board
which indicated he was diagnosed with a status post O’Donaghue’s triad with
repair of medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate, medial
meniscectomy, and pes anserinus transfer; status post Nicholas 5-1 knee
reconstruction; anterior medial instability; and anterolateral instability.
The report further indicated the applicant injured his left knee skiing at
Lee Canyon outside of Las Vegas on 8 December 1974. He was admitted to
Nellis and transferred to March AFB Regional Hospital where a diagnosis of
a tear to the deep and superficial medial collateral ligament, tear to the
anterior cruciate, and peripheral detachment of the medial meniscus of the
applicant’s left knee was made. On 12 December 1974, he had a repair of
the medial collateral ligament, repair of the anterior cruciate, medial
meniscectomy, and pes anserinus transfer. Subsequently, he was seen at
Nellis AFB where he received physical therapy and complained of trouble
running. He was placed in Lennox-Hill brace in May 1975 and stated the
brace helped somewhat. The applicant had a Nicholas 5-1 reconstructive
procedure at Nellis AFB on 22 September 1975. He worked in supply and did
not do any lifting of heavy objects because of an L-4 profile. He
complained of instability of his knee when he walked down stairs, with
buckling of knee in or out of the Lennox-Hill brace. It was recommended he
be seen by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).
The applicant was seen by a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on 9
June 1976. The Findings and Recommended Disposition of the PEB indicated
the applicant was diagnosed with a status post skiing accident in December
1974 with ligamentous repair left knee December 1974 and September 1975,
with instability and no loss of motion and used a brace for support. The
report further indicated the applicant was unfit because of physical
disability and recommended temporary retirement with a disability rating of
30 percent.
AF Form 1180, Action on Physical Evaluation Board and Recommended
Disposition, dated 16 June 1976, indicated the applicant agreed with the
findings and recommended disposition of the PEB.
Special Order Number AC-19434, dated 17 June 1976, indicates the applicant
was to be relieved from active duty on 7 July 1976, placed on the TDRL in
the grade of sergeant with a physical disability rating of 30 percent.
On 7 July 1976, the applicant was honorably retired in the grade of
sergeant, under the provisions of AFM 35-4. The DD Form 214 indicates the
applicant served 4 years, 2 months, and 18 days of total active duty
service.
On 7 March 1978, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council directed
the applicant be removed from the TDRL and he be discharged with severance
pay with a disability rating of 20 percent.
Special Order AC-5317, dated 28 March 1978, indicates the applicant was
removed from the TDRL and discharged on 29 March 1978 by reason of physical
disability with entitlement to disability severance pay per AFM 35-4 in the
grade of sergeant.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommended denial indicating the period a military member is on
the TDRL is not considered active duty and cannot be counted as active
service for retirement purposes. A copy of the Special Order Number 19434,
dated 17 June 1976, was provided by the applicant. He should be able to
provide copies of his Certificate of Discharge, Retirement Order and
Special Order of Discharge to the authorities of the Civil Service
Retirement System (CSRS) and should be able to be credited for time in
service. The data reflected on the applicant’s DD Form 214 dated 7 July
1976 is accurate. The preponderance of evidence reflects no error or
injustice occurred during the disability process. Proper documentation was
noted on the DD Form 214 in accordance with the provisions of military
disability laws and policy.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 8 October 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant's complete submission
was thoroughly reviewed and his contentions were duly noted. However, we
do not find the applicant’s assertions and the documentation provided in
support of his appeal sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale
provided by AFPC/DPPD. The applicant was placed on the TDRL on 8 July 1976
at which time he was issued a DD Form 214 indicating his separation from
active duty under the provisions of AFM 35-4. Subsequently, on 29 March
1978, the applicant was discharged with entitlement to disability severance
pay. The Board notes the DD Form 214 only reflects service information for
the period the member was on active duty. The period a military member is
on the TDRL is not considered active duty and cannot be counted as active
service for retirement. As noted by AFPC/DPPD, the applicant should be
encouraged to present his various separation documents to his civilian
personnel office and request a reevaluation in order to be credited for the
time served on active duty. Therefore, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-
02866 in Executive Session on 16 and 27 December 2004, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Rita S. Looney, Panel Chair
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 September 2004, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 29 September 2004.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 October 2004.
RITA S. LOONEY
Panel Chair
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01787
Left Leg and Right Knee Conditions. The Board opined that the totality of the available evidence supports that the CI’s left leg condition of healed fractures of the femur and tibia resulting in valgus deformity with painful, limited ROM and mild to moderate instability most nearly met the 30% disability rating at the time of permanent separation.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00025
Orthopedic exam several weeks later noted a 1+ effusion with a 1+ Lachman test (i.e., positive anterior instability). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a separation rating of 10% for the left knee ACL condition coded 5257 and 10% for the medial meniscus condition coded 5259 for a combined rating of 20%. Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01771
There was pain during evaluation of ROM and stress of the meniscus. The post separation MRI did not report any abnormality of the PCL and orthopedic examination and arthroscopy did not show any abnormality of the PCL.The Board noted the VA C&P examination report of moderate laxity of the medial collateral ligament upon which the VA based its 20% rating under VASRD code 5257. All Board members agreed that the examinations summarized above reported sufficient evidence of painful motion and...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00583
The MEB found in view of the “osteoarthritis degeneration of the left knee joint” as interfering with duty and forwarded “Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Left Knee, Failed ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) Reconstruction in the Left Knee and Accompanying Anterolateral Rotatory Instability” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on the NAVMED 6100/1. Based on the examination results, the examiner opined that the CI had Bicompartmental osteoarthritis of the left knee secondary to the ACL...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00737
SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (67U20/CH-47 Helicopter Repairman) medically separated for a right knee condition. Right Knee Condition . In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a dual coding disability rating for a combined rating of 30%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00514
Approximately one month after the CI separated from service he had surgery (20050518) to correct his ACL tear and lateral meniscus tear in his right knee. No evidence this condition was unfitting at the time of separation from service. After careful consideration of all available records the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s right knee condition is most appropriately rated at a combined 20% with 10% for 5259 Right Knee Medial and Lateral Meniscal Tear, s/p Repair of Medial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090444C070212
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. The MEB Narrative Summary shows the applicant sustained a left knee hyperextension injury while running during physical training in May 1993. He was diagnosed with left knee PCL rupture status post PCL reconstruction utilizing fresh frozen Achilles allograft; failed allograft and status post PCL reconstruction of left knee utilizing autogenous patellar bone tendon bone...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00655
The CI’s left knee instability was documented multiple times in his service treatment record (STR) and NARSUM and continued after he separated from service. It is not possible to separate out pain symptoms due to patellofemoral pain syndrome and pain symptoms due to Cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic. The Board considered the condition of Anxiety Disorder--NOS and unanimously determined that this condition was not unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01645
Persistent Anterior Knee Pain Condition .The CI originally had a sport-related injury to his right knee in September 2001.A torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was addressed arthroscopically in November 2001,followed by rehabilitative treatment.The CI re-injured his right knee (buckled and popped) while stepping from an aircraft in January 2002, and required a right ACLallograft reconstruction in March 2002.He did well post-operatively with progressive physical therapy (PT) until another...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00848
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the instability of left knee condition as unfitting, rated 10%. Instability of Left Knee Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION Instability of Left Knee, status post Left Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction VASRD CODE RATING 5257 COMBINED 10% 10% The following documentary evidence was...