RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02131
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His first sergeant made homosexual advances towards him, which
resulted in his having to be evaluated. He also had a number of
problems with his commander, particularly after he filed an Inspector
General (IG) complaint.
He would like for his general discharge to be upgraded to honorable so
that he can pass down a positive legacy to his son, who is following
in his footsteps in serving his country.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded
statement.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 Sep 74.
On 11 Aug 76, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was
initiating action against him with a view to effecting the applicant’s
discharge because of numerous counselings for tardiness and being out
of uniform, several letters of reprimand (LORs) for being late for
work and not properly preparing for instructing a class of basic
trainees, and Article 15 actions for failure to go to his appointed
place of duty. The applicant was advised that a general discharge
would be recommended.
On 18 Aug 76, the evaluation officer advised the applicant of his
rights, including his right to submit a rebuttal and make statements
in his own behalf. The applicant submitted a statement of rebuttal to
the discharge action. On 23 Aug 76, he reviewed the facts of the
discharge case and personally interviewed the applicant. He
recommended the applicant be discharged with a general discharge.
On 30 Aug 76, the office of the Staff Judge Advocate found the
discharge case file to be legally sufficient and recommended the
applicant be furnished a general discharge.
On 1 Sep 76, the discharge authority approved the discharge action and
directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge.
On 3 Sep 76, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFM
39-12 (Unsuitability - Apathy, Defective Attitudes and Inability to
Expend Effort Constructively) and furnished a general discharge. He
was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 25 days of active service.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia,
indicated that, on the basis of data furnished, they are unable to
locate an arrest record (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial indicating that based on the
documentation in the applicant’s records, the discharge was consistent
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation, and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
In their view, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify
any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing,
and he provided no facts warranting a change to his character of
service.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 8 Oct
04 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit E).
In response to the Board’s staff request for documentation pertaining
to his activities since leaving the service, the applicant provided
additional documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration, which
is attached at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged
for unsuitability. No evidence has been presented which would lead us
to believe his discharge was improper or contrary to the directive
under which it was effected. However, we note that the applicant was
discharged in 1976. In view of the passage of time, and since it
appears the applicant has made a successful transition to civilian
life, we believe the continued stigma of the general discharge for the
offenses committed no longer serves any useful purpose. Therefore, we
are of the opinion that upgrading the applicant’s discharge to
honorable, based on clemency, would be appropriate in this case.
Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s general discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 3 Sep 76, he was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 8 Dec 04, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Panel Chair
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-02131 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Jul 04, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 29 Sep 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Oct 04.
Exhibit G. Letter, applicant, dated 24 Oct 04, w/atch.
MARTHA J. EVANS
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02131
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 3 Sep 76, he was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02793
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02793 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The evidence of record reflects the applicant was discharged for drug abuse. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02233
We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that the uncharacterized entry-level separation received by the former member should be changed to an honorable discharge. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. However, after a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01796
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: By letter, dated 25 Oct 04 (sic), the applicant’s counsel provided additional documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration, which is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02210
On 18 March 2004, he received a Letter of Counseling for failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty. Evidence has not been provided in support of his appeal, which would lead us to believe that a change to his RE code is warranted. Absent persuasive evidence that the applicant was denied rights to which he was entitled or that the appropriate standards were not applied during his discharge processing, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03151
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03151 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on his post service activities and accomplishments...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03151
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03151 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on his post service activities and accomplishments...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02206
The applicant on 22 September 2003, submitted an AF Form 31, Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation, requesting she be separated in accordance with AFI 36- 3208, paragraph 3.11, Air Force nonfulfillment of enlistment agreement. Based on the evidence provided they recommend the requested relief be denied. Based on the documentation in the applicant's records, it appears the processing of the discharge and the characterization of the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01526
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01526 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted from the grade of airman second class (A2C) to airman first class (A1C). There are no other promotion orders in his record to indicate he was ever promoted to A1C. We took notice of the applicant's...