Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02793
Original file (BC-2004-02793.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02793

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general discharge be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Although he tested positive  for  marijuana,  he  believes  it  was  a
youthful transgression.  He has not used any recreational drugs  since
that time, and he  volunteered  to  testify  at  the  trial  of  other
individuals charged with drug-related offenses.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a character reference
statement.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 Oct 81 for a  period
of four years.

On 18 Jun 85, the applicant’s  commander  notified  him  that  he  was
recommending his discharge for drug abuse.  The reason was that  on  7
May 85, he  received  nonjudicial  punishment  under  Article  15  for
wrongfully using marijuana on 12 Mar 85.

On 9 Jul 85,  the  office  of  the  Staff  Judge  Advocate  found  the
discharge case file to  be  legally  sufficient  and  recommended  the
applicant be furnished a general discharge.

On 12 Jul 85, the discharge authority approved  the  discharge  action
and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge.

On 11 Oct 85, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR
39-10 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse) and furnished a general discharge.  He
was credited with 3 years, 11 months, and 28 days of active service.

The  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation,  Clarksburg,  West  Virginia,
indicated that, on the basis of data furnished,  they  are  unable  to
locate an arrest record (Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial indicating based on the documentation in
the  applicant’s  records,  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the
procedural and substantive requirements of the  discharge  regulation,
and was within the discretion of the discharge  authority.   In  their
view, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors
or injustices that  occurred  in  the  discharge  processing,  and  he
provided no facts warranting a change to his character of service.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  applicant  on  24
Sep 04 for review and response.  As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit E).

By letter, dated 19 Oct 04,  the  Board's  staff  requested  that  the
applicant provide  information  pertaining  to  his  activities  since
leaving the service.  As of this date, no response has  been  received
by this office (Exhibit F).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  The evidence of record reflects the applicant was  discharged  for
drug abuse.  No evidence has been presented which  would  lead  us  to
believe his discharge was improper or contrary to the directive  under
which it was effected.   However,  we  note  that  the  applicant  was
discharged in 1985.  In view of the passage  of  time,  and  since  it
appears the applicant has been drug free and  has  made  a  successful
transition to civilian life, we believe the continued  stigma  of  the
general discharge no longer serves any useful purpose.  Therefore,  we
are of  the  opinion  that  upgrading  the  applicant’s  discharge  to
honorable, based on clemency,  would  be  appropriate  in  this  case.
Accordingly,  we  recommend  the  applicant’s  general  discharge   be
upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 11 Oct 85, he  was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-02793 in Executive Session on 8 Dec 03, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Martha J. Evans, Panel Chair
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
      Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Aug 04, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  FBI report.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 16 Sep 04.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Sep 04.
     Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Oct 04.





                                   MARTHA J. EVANS
                                   Panel Chair



AFBCMR BC-2004-02793




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 11 Oct 85, he was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.







    JOE G. LINEBERGER

    Director

    Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02131

    Original file (BC-2004-02131.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    He recommended the applicant be discharged with a general discharge. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 8 Oct 04 for review and response. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00933

    Original file (BC-2005-00933.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00933 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1985 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 6 Nov 85, the commander recommended the applicant be separated with a general discharge for drug abuse. Accordingly, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00784

    Original file (BC-2005-00784.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00785

    Original file (BC-2005-00785.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommended denial indicating the Separations Section of the applicant’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was contacted and the noncommissioned officer (NCO) who processed the applicant’s separation application stated the applicant was briefed on the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service Commitment Program and the possibility of recoupment. After a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03080

    Original file (BC-2004-03080.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 27 Feb 85, the Commander, 15th Air Force, recommended the applicant’s resignation be approved and he be given a general discharge. In view of the above, the majority of the Board concludes that no basis exists to recommend favorable action on the applicant’s request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. RENEE M. COLLIER Acting Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MRB SUBJECT: AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02504

    Original file (BC-2006-02504.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02504 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 FEBRUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant was discharged on 24 Apr 85, in the grade of staff sergeant, under the provisions of AFR 39-10,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03507

    Original file (BC-2003-03507.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 Oct 92, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable. They also noted applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing and provided no other facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge. After careful consideration of the evidence of record, we found no evidence that the actions taken to effect the applicant’s discharge were improper or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03614

    Original file (BC-2004-03614.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2004-03614 INDEX CODE: 36.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02524

    Original file (BC-2004-02524.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPOO indicated that based on the applicant’s situation and information provided by the applicant and his commander, they recommend approval of the applicant’s request for a Regular Air Force appointment. Having carefully reviewed this application, a majority of the Board agrees with the recommendation of AFPC/DPPPOO that the applicant should be tendered a Regular Air Force appointment. Therefore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01140

    Original file (BC-2004-01140.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived his right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, chose not to submit a statement in his own behalf, and requested not to be considered for the probation and rehabilitation (P&R) program. The discharge authority approved the discharge on 18 March 1974 and ordered an undesirable characterization without P&R. While we note the applicant’s assertion that he has not been in any trouble since his separation, the seriousness of the offenses for which the...