RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03151
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Based on his post service activities and accomplishments his discharge
should be upgraded. In support of his request applicant provided a copy of
his discharge order, a personal statement, character references, and copies
of his Bachelor's and Associate degree certificates. His complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 3 Nov 78 and was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class.
On 31 Jul 80, court-martial charges were referred against the applicant for
the wrongful possession, use, and sale of marijuana. On 6 Aug 80, after
consulting counsel, the applicant requested discharge for the good of the
service under the provisions of AFM 39-12, paragraph 2-78. His commander
recommended approval of his request and recommended that he be furnished a
discharge under other than honorable conditions. The wing staff judge
advocate found the case to be legally sufficient and on 4 Sep 80, the
discharge authority approved his request. He was discharged on 12 Sep 80
without probation and rehabilitation. He served 1 year, 10 months, and 10
days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)
indicated that they were unable to locate an arrest record pertaining to
the applicant (see Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of applicant's request. DPPRS states that the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements
of the discharge regulation and the applicant did not submit any new
evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the
discharge processing. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Nov
02 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We are not persuaded by the evidence
submitted in support of his appeal that an upgrade of his discharge is
warranted. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly
reviewing the evidence of record, we do not believe he has suffered from an
injustice. We find his post-service accomplishments commendable and
considered upgrading his discharge of the basis of clemency; however,
because of the serious nature of the charges referred against the
applicant, we do not believe that the characterization of his service
warrants upgrade on the basis of clemency. Therefore, based on the
available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably
consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03151 in
Executive Session on 29 Jan 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Ms. Martha Evans, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Oct 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Oct 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Nov 02.
Exhibit E. FBI Negative Reply, dated 20 Dec 02.
PHILIP SHEUERMAN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03151
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03151 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on his post service activities and accomplishments...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02854
The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant provided a personal statement summarizing his accomplishments since leaving the service. Exhibit B. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Jan 03.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03445 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. On 28 Sep 54, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the member’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. After thoroughly...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03277
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03277 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. However, he did serve honorably while in the Air Force. In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his discharge evaluation officer's...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02318
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02318 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge, or in the alternative, a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03017a
He had completed a total of 3 years and 11 days (not including 122 days of lost time), and was serving in the grade of Airman 2nd Class (E-3) when discharged. He is truly sorry for his actions while in the Air Force and states that he thinks about his undesirable discharge every day. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03017
He had completed a total of 3 years and 11 days (not including 122 days of lost time), and was serving in the grade of Airman 2nd Class (E-3) when discharged. He is truly sorry for his actions while in the Air Force and states that he thinks about his undesirable discharge every day. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03701
The records also contain a letter from the Secretary of the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) scheduling a review of his discharge on 17 Nov 59. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, on 10 February 1959, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). Exhibit B.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02024 INDEX CODE: A79.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02627
On 11 December 1984, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge due to his referral and subsequent failure to successfully complete a program of rehabilitation for alcohol abuse and his lack of potential for continued military service, as evidenced by the incidents cited above. (Exhibit C) ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR medical consultant found that no change in applicant’s record was...