RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00737
INDEX CODE: 136.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that he retired from the Air Force
Reserve at age 60 rather than being separated with Disability
Severance Pay.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was denied the filing of his application for Reserve retirement
at age 60 based on a legal opinion, dated 5 Dec 94, and then later
received a letter, dated 14 May 03, from HQ ARPC allowing the
retirement application. His application was denied because
severance pay was determined to be retired pay.
He states he was never briefed that he would lose his retirement
eligibility or survivor benefits. He was briefed that the letter
of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 was conclusive.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a handwritten note;
copies of letters he received from HQ ARPC regarding his retirement
at age 60; AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation,
dated 7 Sep 88 and excerpts from Title 10 USC 1223 and 1215.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 Oct 53. He was
released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve
on 12 Sep 57. His grade at the time of his release from active
duty was airman second class (A1C/E-4). He was credited with
3 years, 11 months of active duty service.
He served in the Air Force Reserve from 13 Sep 57 until his
discharge on 15 Sep 88 due to physical disability with entitlement
to severance pay. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
senior master sergeant with an effective date and date of rank of
17 Oct 63. Applicant was credited with 11.30 years of active duty
service for pay at the time of his discharge. His ARPC Form 168,
dated 26 Aug 88 reflects he was credited with 31 years and
11 months of satisfactory Federal service.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPP reviewed this application and recommended denial.
Applicant was medically disqualified for military service in 1988.
By law, he could either be discharged with entitlement to
disability severance pay or, if eligible, request transfer to the
Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) to await pay at age
60. Since the applicant has over 20 years of satisfactory service,
he was eligible to transfer to ISLRS to await retired pay, however,
he elected to be discharged with disability severance pay.
Applicant claims he was never briefed, as required by law,
regarding what effect accepting the disability severance pay would
have on his retired pay benefits. DPPR could not verify whether or
not applicant did receive a briefing prior to separation. However,
the statutory separation counseling requirement did not exist when
the applicant was separated from military service in 1988.
A review of the applicant’s package submitted to HQ ARPC/JA, in
2003, determined that the applicant was not eligible for Reserve
retired pay because he had accepted and received disability
severance pay.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant provided a response to the evaluation by letter dated
8 May 04, explaining the reasons why he believes he should be
entitled to retired pay at age 60.
In support of his appeal, he provided a personal statement and
excerpts from Title 10 USC attached a copy of a letter from the
Veterans Administration (VA).
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice warranting a correction to the
record. The applicant, as the record now stands, was not entitled
to retired pay when he reached age 60. The applicant contends he
was not properly briefed that when he accepted severance pay in
1988, he forfeited his eligibility to receive retired pay. After
reviewing the circumstances surrounding this case, we believe it is
likely the applicant did not receive proper counseling at the time.
In this respect, we note the applicant had been previously
notified he was eligible for retired pay at age 60. In addition,
we find it inconceivable the applicant would have forfeited his
retirement pay after serving over 31 years of satisfactory federal
service. The applicant, once he reached the age of 60, applied for
his retired pay. We believe, based on all evidence, his records
should be corrected to entitle him to retired pay. The severance
pay he received will have to be recouped, and he will be provided
the opportunity to make an election under the Reserve Component
Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not discharged from the Air Force Reserve,
but was transferred to the Retired Reserve Section on 15 September
1988 to await pay at age 60 rather than being discharged due to
physical disability with entitlement to severance pay.
b. He was assigned to the USAF Retired List on 15 May
1995 and was eligible for retired pay under the provisions of Title
10, United States Code, Section 12731.
c. He be provided the opportunity to make an election
under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2004-00737 in Executive Session on 1 September 2004, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Feb 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPP, dated 6 Apr 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Apr 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 1 May 04, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-00737
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not discharged from the Air Force Reserve,
but was transferred to the Retired Reserve Section on 15 September
1988 to await pay at age 60 rather than being discharged due to
physical disability with entitlement to severance pay.
b. He was assigned to the USAF Retired List on 15 May
1995 and was eligible for retired pay under the provisions of Title
10, United States Code, Section 12731.
c. He be provided the opportunity to make an election
under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02739
Since the applicant had over 20 years of satisfactory service, she was eligible to transfer to ISLRS and apply for retired pay at age 60. The applicant was discharged on 4 August 2005 ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial and states the applicant’s record indicates she completed the service requirements for Reserve retired pay under the provision of Title 10, USC, Section 1231, on 1 March 2000. The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02034
When a member makes an election to participate in the RCSBP, the election is irrevocable. ARPC/DPP complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force advisory and states he never received notice or information about withdrawing from RCSBP. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03829 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reserve Component Survivor Benefits Plan (RCSBP) election be changed from Option “A” (Decline to make an election until age 60) to Option “C” (Immediate Annuity). He agreed and elected Option “A.”...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00978
Her husband was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by letter dated 28 December 1988. He made no election within 90 days of receipt of notification, and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred Election Until Age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Seasons 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to change their election to cover their...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02812
She receives DVA disability benefits; however, her severance pay is being recouped by the DVA. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial. The issue of the DVA recouping the disability severance pay from her DVA disability compensation does not change the fact that the applicant chose to accept disability severance pay in lieu of Reserve retired pay.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03489
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Applicant states that her DFAS-CL 7220/48, Retiree Account Statement, shows an error for the RCSBP cost of $29.66 and request this error be corrected. She chose option C because their were no mention of RCSBP cost in Section VI, and the base personnel office did not make her aware of the cost associated with electing Option C. She never expected to pay for anything except for one payment for spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00065
However, he has just discovered that his 1999 survivor benefit election was listed as “having not been received.” In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement, copies of medical records and additional documents associated with the issues cited in his contentions. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
However, he has just discovered that his 1999 survivor benefit election was listed as “having not been received.” In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement, copies of medical records and additional documents associated with the issues cited in his contentions. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01652
The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.