Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02812
Original file (BC-2007-02812.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

      IN THE MATTER OF:            DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-02812
            INDEX CODE: 110.00
XXXXXXX                           COUNSEL:  NONE
                                   HEARING DESIRED:  YES

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She receive Reserve retired pay and benefits upon reaching the age of 60.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her severance pay is being recouped by the Department of  Veterans  Affairs
(DVA); therefore, she should be eligible for the “gray area” retirement she
earned effective 1 March 2002.  She became eligible  for  the  “gray  area”
retirement effective 1 March 2002, which she  is  being  denied.   She  was
hoping to obtain 20 years of active service for a retirement but  after  18
years of service she became disabled and was separated with severance  pay.
Her unit’s interpretation was that severance pay bought out her  retirement
benefits.  She receives DVA disability benefits; however, her severance pay
is being recouped by the DVA.  Since she is  paying  back  the  money,  she
believes she should be eligible for the “gray area” retirement  she  earned
effective 1 March 2002.

In support of her request, the applicant submitted  a  memorandum  from  HQ
ARPC/DPPR and special order number P-067.

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 25 October 1979, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.

She completed the service requirements for Reserve retired  pay  under  the
provision of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), in 2002 and was  issued
a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at age 60 letter  on  4  June
2002.  According to Title 10, once a person  has  completed  the  years  of
service required for eligibility for retired pay, the person’s  eligibility
for retired pay may not be denied or revoked on  the  basis  of  an  error,
miscalculation, misinformation,  or  administrative  determination  of  the
years of service performed unless it resulted directly from  the  fraud  or
misrepresentation of the person.

A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened  and  referred  her  case  to  an
Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB).  The IPEB found  her  unfit  for
further military service and recommended a combined compensable  rating  of
10%.  Because the applicant had over 20 years of satisfactory  service  she
had the option of electing to be discharged with severance  pay  or  to  be
placed on the Reserve Retired list awaiting pay at  age  60.   She  elected
discharge with severance pay.

On 6 March 2006, she was discharged in the grade of technical sergeant  for
Medical Disqualification with severance pay.

She served a total of 18 years and 3 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial.  DPP  states  the  applicant  was  medically
disqualified for military service in 2006.  In accordance  with  Title  10,
U.S.C, Sections 1206 and 1209, the applicant  could  either  be  discharged
with entitlements to disability severance  pay,  or  if  eligible,  request
transfer to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) and apply  for
pay at age 60.  Since the applicant  had  over  20  years  of  satisfactory
service, she was eligible to  transfer  to  ISLRS  and  apply  for  Reserve
retired pay at age 60; however, she elected discharge with  severance  pay.
DPP cannot  comment  on  the  DVA’s  procedures  for  recouping  disability
severance pay from the applicant’s DVA disability  compensation.   DPP  can
only confirm that DVA disability  and  Reserve  retired  pay  are  separate
programs and are governed by separate laws.  The issue of the DVA recouping
the disability severance pay from her DVA disability compensation does  not
change the fact that the applicant chose to accept disability severance pay
in lieu of Reserve retired pay.  The applicant had  the  option  of  taking
disability severance pay or waiting until  age  60  to  apply  for  Reserve
retired pay.  The applicant elected and received disability  severance  pay
under the provision of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1206.  Since there  is  no
provision of law that allows a member to accept both  disability  severance
pay and Reserve retired pay, she is not eligible to apply for  and  receive
Reserve retired pay under the provision of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731.

The complete DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant responded stating it is her understanding she is being denied
Guard benefits because she chose to accept severance pay after she incurred
a disability while on active service.  She did not choose to separate  from
service but was forced out.  At the time of her  separation,  she  was  not
offered the option of waiting until age 60 to  apply  for  Reserve  retired
pay.  According to the personnel advisors, she would be paid severance  pay
due to disability from active duty.  However she had already earned a Guard
retirement.  After she started receiving DVA disability, the  DVA  notified
her they would be recouping the entire disability severance.   This  brings
her back to the original question, if  she  has  to  repay  the  disability
severance in its entirely to the DVA,  then  why  would  awarding  her  the
retirement she earned be considered double dipping.  Had she been  able  to
finish two more years and receive an active retirement, she would have also
been eligible to receive VA disability.  She has written  her  senator  and
the Secretary of the Air Force on this same issue.  All  she  has  received
was a phone call apologizing for the oversight and asking her to return the
money then she could receive a Reserve  retirement.   She  was  paying  her
mortgage and bills with the money.  As a 45 year old  woman  crippled  with
arthritis after serving years in the Security Forces, she had to go through
a tremendous learning  curve  in  civilian  life.   She  is  certainly  not
eligible to work in a compatible civilian  field.   She  believes  she  was
being forced/bought out of her active contract.  It was  her  understanding
based on counseling she received she should also be  eligible  for  Reserve
retirement.  It was not until months later, someone called  asking  her  to
return the severance she was paying bills with  in  order  to  receive  the
retirement she had earned four  years  earlier.   She  understands  she  is
probably one of the few people these circumstances would apply to.

The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error  or  injustice.   The  applicant  is  requesting  her
election for discharge with severance pay  be  changed  to  show  that  she
instead elected placement on the Reserve retired list, eligible to  receive
retired pay upon reaching the age of 60.  It appears that the basis for her
request is driven by the DVA's offset of the  severance  pay  she  received
from her DVA disability compensation payments.  However, we  are  compelled
to  note  that  favorable  consideration  of  her  request,  would  require
recoupment  of  the  severance  pay  as  well,  leaving  her  in  the  same
predicament she now finds herself in.  Notwithstanding the above,  we  find
no error in this case, and after  careful  consideration  of  the  evidence
presented, are not persuaded that the DVA's  recoupment  of  her  severance
pay, as required by law, constitutes an injustice.  Further, we do not find
her uncorroborated assertion of miscounseling  sufficiently  persuasive  to
make a determination that an injustice exists in this case.  Therefore,  we
agree with the opinion and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought   in   this
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issues involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
02812 in Executive Session on 6 February 2008, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

              Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
              Ms. Mary Jane Mitchell, Member
              Ms. Marcy C. Puckett, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 August 2007, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, undated.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 December 2007.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 15 December 2007.




                                             THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                        Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02739

    Original file (BC-2007-02739.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the applicant had over 20 years of satisfactory service, she was eligible to transfer to ISLRS and apply for retired pay at age 60. The applicant was discharged on 4 August 2005 ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial and states the applicant’s record indicates she completed the service requirements for Reserve retired pay under the provision of Title 10, USC, Section 1231, on 1 March 2000. The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02812

    Original file (BC-2004-02812.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her record shows she completed 15 years, 10 months, and 21 days of honorable federal service as of 18 August 1993. Regarding early qualification for retired pay for members who were medically disqualified for duty, a member must have completed at least 15 years, but less than 20 years, of satisfactory federal service and been medically disqualified for military service on or after 5 October 1994. In this case she would have been eligible for a Reserve retirement at age 60 as she would have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00737

    Original file (BC-2004-00737.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00737 INDEX CODE: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he retired from the Air Force Reserve at age 60 rather than being separated with Disability Severance Pay. He was briefed that the letter of eligibility for retired pay at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00032

    Original file (BC-2007-00032.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00032 INDEX CODE: 135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JULY 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her mother receive the retirement pay her father did not collect, as well as survivor benefits. Applicant’s father did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service and is not eligible for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-02598

    Original file (BC-2006-02598.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Eligibility rules for the receipt of CRDP require a Reserve component member to be receiving Reserve retired pay. The previous board’s action did not result in the decedent receiving Reserve retired pay - it only made him eligible to receive retired pay when he reached 60 years of age. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 31 Oct 09.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017349C070206

    Original file (20050017349C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a NGB Form 22, with an effective date of 15 December 2003, which shows, in pertinent part, that at the time of the applicant's discharge she had completed a total of 19 years, 5 months, and 22 days service for retired pay. The evidence of records shows that the applicant completed her last 6 years of qualifying service as a member of the ARNG. The evidence of records also shows that, at the time of her discharge, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01249

    Original file (BC-2012-01249.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 February 2008, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) evaluated the applicant’s case and recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent for post-concussive syndrome with headaches, sleep disturbance and cognitive and memory complaints with a history of four previous concussions under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 8045-9304. Under Title 10, U.S.C., Physical Evaluation Boards must determine if a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202018

    Original file (0202018.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The letter further explained his record showed he had only completed 9 years, 9 months and 9 days of satisfactory service; therefore, he did not meet the requirements for Reserve retired pay at age 60 then or in the future, nor any benefits associated with retired pay. The applicant did not complete 30 years of satisfactory service as required by Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731, therefore, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay at age 60. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02866

    Original file (BC-2005-02866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, only five years of this time was satisfactory service creditable toward retired pay eligibility. The applicant’s record contains no documentation of active Reserve participation other than the two periods she served on active duty, 31 Oct 66 through 30 Oct 68, and 4 Dec 91 through 23 Nov 94. Other than the two periods applicant served on active duty, 31 Oct 66 to 30 Oct 68, and 4 Dec 91 to 23 Nov 94, there is no evidence of any active Reserve participation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00599

    Original file (BC-2010-00599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00599 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her status as a member of the honorary retired reserve be restored and she be issued a new identification (ID) card. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...