RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02812
INDEX CODE: 110.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She receive Reserve retired pay and benefits upon reaching the age of 60.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her severance pay is being recouped by the Department of Veterans Affairs
(DVA); therefore, she should be eligible for the “gray area” retirement she
earned effective 1 March 2002. She became eligible for the “gray area”
retirement effective 1 March 2002, which she is being denied. She was
hoping to obtain 20 years of active service for a retirement but after 18
years of service she became disabled and was separated with severance pay.
Her unit’s interpretation was that severance pay bought out her retirement
benefits. She receives DVA disability benefits; however, her severance pay
is being recouped by the DVA. Since she is paying back the money, she
believes she should be eligible for the “gray area” retirement she earned
effective 1 March 2002.
In support of her request, the applicant submitted a memorandum from HQ
ARPC/DPPR and special order number P-067.
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 25 October 1979, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
She completed the service requirements for Reserve retired pay under the
provision of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), in 2002 and was issued
a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at age 60 letter on 4 June
2002. According to Title 10, once a person has completed the years of
service required for eligibility for retired pay, the person’s eligibility
for retired pay may not be denied or revoked on the basis of an error,
miscalculation, misinformation, or administrative determination of the
years of service performed unless it resulted directly from the fraud or
misrepresentation of the person.
A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened and referred her case to an
Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The IPEB found her unfit for
further military service and recommended a combined compensable rating of
10%. Because the applicant had over 20 years of satisfactory service she
had the option of electing to be discharged with severance pay or to be
placed on the Reserve Retired list awaiting pay at age 60. She elected
discharge with severance pay.
On 6 March 2006, she was discharged in the grade of technical sergeant for
Medical Disqualification with severance pay.
She served a total of 18 years and 3 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial. DPP states the applicant was medically
disqualified for military service in 2006. In accordance with Title 10,
U.S.C, Sections 1206 and 1209, the applicant could either be discharged
with entitlements to disability severance pay, or if eligible, request
transfer to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) and apply for
pay at age 60. Since the applicant had over 20 years of satisfactory
service, she was eligible to transfer to ISLRS and apply for Reserve
retired pay at age 60; however, she elected discharge with severance pay.
DPP cannot comment on the DVA’s procedures for recouping disability
severance pay from the applicant’s DVA disability compensation. DPP can
only confirm that DVA disability and Reserve retired pay are separate
programs and are governed by separate laws. The issue of the DVA recouping
the disability severance pay from her DVA disability compensation does not
change the fact that the applicant chose to accept disability severance pay
in lieu of Reserve retired pay. The applicant had the option of taking
disability severance pay or waiting until age 60 to apply for Reserve
retired pay. The applicant elected and received disability severance pay
under the provision of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1206. Since there is no
provision of law that allows a member to accept both disability severance
pay and Reserve retired pay, she is not eligible to apply for and receive
Reserve retired pay under the provision of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731.
The complete DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded stating it is her understanding she is being denied
Guard benefits because she chose to accept severance pay after she incurred
a disability while on active service. She did not choose to separate from
service but was forced out. At the time of her separation, she was not
offered the option of waiting until age 60 to apply for Reserve retired
pay. According to the personnel advisors, she would be paid severance pay
due to disability from active duty. However she had already earned a Guard
retirement. After she started receiving DVA disability, the DVA notified
her they would be recouping the entire disability severance. This brings
her back to the original question, if she has to repay the disability
severance in its entirely to the DVA, then why would awarding her the
retirement she earned be considered double dipping. Had she been able to
finish two more years and receive an active retirement, she would have also
been eligible to receive VA disability. She has written her senator and
the Secretary of the Air Force on this same issue. All she has received
was a phone call apologizing for the oversight and asking her to return the
money then she could receive a Reserve retirement. She was paying her
mortgage and bills with the money. As a 45 year old woman crippled with
arthritis after serving years in the Security Forces, she had to go through
a tremendous learning curve in civilian life. She is certainly not
eligible to work in a compatible civilian field. She believes she was
being forced/bought out of her active contract. It was her understanding
based on counseling she received she should also be eligible for Reserve
retirement. It was not until months later, someone called asking her to
return the severance she was paying bills with in order to receive the
retirement she had earned four years earlier. She understands she is
probably one of the few people these circumstances would apply to.
The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant is requesting her
election for discharge with severance pay be changed to show that she
instead elected placement on the Reserve retired list, eligible to receive
retired pay upon reaching the age of 60. It appears that the basis for her
request is driven by the DVA's offset of the severance pay she received
from her DVA disability compensation payments. However, we are compelled
to note that favorable consideration of her request, would require
recoupment of the severance pay as well, leaving her in the same
predicament she now finds herself in. Notwithstanding the above, we find
no error in this case, and after careful consideration of the evidence
presented, are not persuaded that the DVA's recoupment of her severance
pay, as required by law, constitutes an injustice. Further, we do not find
her uncorroborated assertion of miscounseling sufficiently persuasive to
make a determination that an injustice exists in this case. Therefore, we
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
02812 in Executive Session on 6 February 2008, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Mary Jane Mitchell, Member
Ms. Marcy C. Puckett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 August 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPP, undated.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 December 2007.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 15 December 2007.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02739
Since the applicant had over 20 years of satisfactory service, she was eligible to transfer to ISLRS and apply for retired pay at age 60. The applicant was discharged on 4 August 2005 ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial and states the applicant’s record indicates she completed the service requirements for Reserve retired pay under the provision of Title 10, USC, Section 1231, on 1 March 2000. The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02812
Her record shows she completed 15 years, 10 months, and 21 days of honorable federal service as of 18 August 1993. Regarding early qualification for retired pay for members who were medically disqualified for duty, a member must have completed at least 15 years, but less than 20 years, of satisfactory federal service and been medically disqualified for military service on or after 5 October 1994. In this case she would have been eligible for a Reserve retirement at age 60 as she would have...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00737
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00737 INDEX CODE: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he retired from the Air Force Reserve at age 60 rather than being separated with Disability Severance Pay. He was briefed that the letter of eligibility for retired pay at...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00032
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00032 INDEX CODE: 135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JULY 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her mother receive the retirement pay her father did not collect, as well as survivor benefits. Applicant’s father did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service and is not eligible for...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-02598
Eligibility rules for the receipt of CRDP require a Reserve component member to be receiving Reserve retired pay. The previous board’s action did not result in the decedent receiving Reserve retired pay - it only made him eligible to receive retired pay when he reached 60 years of age. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 31 Oct 09.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017349C070206
The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a NGB Form 22, with an effective date of 15 December 2003, which shows, in pertinent part, that at the time of the applicant's discharge she had completed a total of 19 years, 5 months, and 22 days service for retired pay. The evidence of records shows that the applicant completed her last 6 years of qualifying service as a member of the ARNG. The evidence of records also shows that, at the time of her discharge, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01249
On 11 February 2008, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) evaluated the applicant’s case and recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent for post-concussive syndrome with headaches, sleep disturbance and cognitive and memory complaints with a history of four previous concussions under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 8045-9304. Under Title 10, U.S.C., Physical Evaluation Boards must determine if a...
The letter further explained his record showed he had only completed 9 years, 9 months and 9 days of satisfactory service; therefore, he did not meet the requirements for Reserve retired pay at age 60 then or in the future, nor any benefits associated with retired pay. The applicant did not complete 30 years of satisfactory service as required by Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731, therefore, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay at age 60. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02866
However, only five years of this time was satisfactory service creditable toward retired pay eligibility. The applicant’s record contains no documentation of active Reserve participation other than the two periods she served on active duty, 31 Oct 66 through 30 Oct 68, and 4 Dec 91 through 23 Nov 94. Other than the two periods applicant served on active duty, 31 Oct 66 to 30 Oct 68, and 4 Dec 91 to 23 Nov 94, there is no evidence of any active Reserve participation.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00599
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00599 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her status as a member of the honorary retired reserve be restored and she be issued a new identification (ID) card. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...