Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02018
Original file (BC-2003-02018.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02018
                                  (Case 2)

            INDEX CODE: 128.14

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be reimbursed in the amount of $221.00 for premiums paid on  her  Family
Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI).
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She and her husband are active duty officers.  They  knew  about  FSGLI  and
knew a declination needed to be made.  Her spouse spoke with  the  Chief  of
Finance at Keesler AFB and asked if it applied to them as military  spouses.
 He advised them it did not and it  did  not  reflect  on  their  LES.   Her
spouse signed a declination statement in February 2003 and she on  14  March
2003.  When she received her March LES, it reflected a  stipend  overpayment
debt of $208 and a $13 discretionary allotment for the FSGLI.

In support of her request,  the  applicant  submits  a  personal  statement.
Applicant’s submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in  the  grade  of  major,
with an effective date and date of rank of 1 September 1999.

Public Law 107-14, Veterans’ Survivor Benefits Improvement Act of  2001  was
passed on 5 June 2001 and approved by the President.  The law  expanded  the
Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program to establish  coverage  for
spouses and children in the event of their death.   The  coverage,  by  law,
was automatic for all members of the  Armed  Forces  who  had  a  spouse  or
child(ren), unless the member declined coverage.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied.  DPW states  that,  on  16
July 2003, the applicant was notified that they were unable to  process  her
request without  additional  documentation.   DPW  requested  the  applicant
provide a copy of her SGLV  8286A,  Family  Coverage  Election  Certificate,
declining coverage and any documentation to support  her  claim.   Applicant
did  not  respond  or  provide  the   additional   information   needed   to
sufficiently evaluate her claim.  The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation is  at  Exhibit
B.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  26
September 2003 for review and response.  As of this date,  this  office  has
received no response (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or  injustice.   We  note  that  the  applicant  has  not
responded to HQ AFPC/DPW’s request for additional information  in  order  to
sufficiently evaluate her claim.  Absent such evidence, it  is  our  opinion
that no basis exists to reimburse the  premiums  withheld.   Therefore,  the
applicant’s request is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 2 December 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

           Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chairman
           Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
           Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR  Docket  Number
BC-2003-02018:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 03, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 22 Sep 03, w/atch.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Sep 03.





                                  JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393

    Original file (BC-2003-01393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02974

    Original file (BC-2003-02974.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated despite what the OTS personnel stated she had provided the Board with only information she was given regarding the SGLI program. She states that had she seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted from her pay, she would have taken action to decline coverage. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02449

    Original file (BC-2003-02449.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02783

    Original file (BC-2003-02783.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse or child(ren), unless the member declined coverage. Although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 - 30 June 2003. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00548

    Original file (BC-2003-00548.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00548 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of 1 November 2001. DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01091

    Original file (BC-2003-01091.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862

    Original file (BC-2002-03862.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00128

    Original file (BC-2003-00128.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aviano MPF told her there was no way to recover this money. Applicant paid FSGLI premiums from August 2002 to November 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665

    Original file (BC-2003-00665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03434

    Original file (BC-2003-03434.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied. Although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, DPW states her spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 20 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI...