RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00236
INDEX CODE: 108.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical conditions, back strain, spinal disc
condition, and hemorrhoids, be assessed as combat related in order to
qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation
(CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was ordered to pick up a heavy object while in a war exercise at Nellis
AFB, NV. He spent two weeks in the hospital after his injury.
In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with
his initial CRSC application. His complete submission, with attachments,
is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 13
Nov 67. He was progressively promoted to the grade of technical sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Aug 85.
He served as an Administration Specialist and a Material Storage and
Distribution Supervisor.
An MEB convened and referred his case to an Informal Physical Evaluation
Board (IPEB) with a diagnosis of chronic low back pain. On 10 May 89, the
IPEB recommended that he be returned to duty. The applicant disagreed with
the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB. On 10 Jul 89, a
Formal PEB recommended that the applicant be permanently retired from the
Air Force with a combined disability rating of 10%. The applicant
concurred with the recommended findings. On 2 Aug 89, the Air Force PEB
directed that he be retired in the grade of technical sergeant. He was
placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List on 28 Oct 89. He served 21
years, 11 months, and 15 days on active duty.
Current Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined
compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions.
His CRSC application was disapproved on 24 Nov 03 based upon the fact that
his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat-
related.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states his service connected medical
conditions are not combat related. The fact that disabilities are incurred
during an exercise is not sufficient to support a combat-related
determination without a direct relationship between the exercise and the
injury itself. Lifting, which is the direct cause of his injuries, is not
considered to be combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Jun
04 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in
the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for compensation
under the CRSC Act. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the
Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-
00236 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 05, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 6 Feb 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Feb 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 23 Feb 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, ODUSD(MPP)/Comp, dated 21 Jul 04.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 28 Jul 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02461
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02461 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, intervertegral disc syndrome, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02637
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02637 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Feb 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03621
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, line 10(b) is marked YES, as the disability did occur during a time of war in the line of duty. What the Air Force is telling him is that in no way an Air Force member can have a combat-related injury if they were medically retired and entered the Air Force prior to the date indicated on the form. DPPD states the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03103
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The fact that a member may incur a medical condition during a period of war or while performing combat operations is not sufficient evidence to support a combat-related determination. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 20 Jan 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00250
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00250 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated Mandatory Case Completion Date: 30 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertensive heart disease, knee prosthesis, degenerative arthritis, and traumatic arthritis, be assessed as combat related in order to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02532
His next entry for back pain was on 21 Mar 85 when he sought care for low back pain incurred while lifting a manhole cover. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01097
On 30 Sep 89, he was removed from the TDRL and retired in the grade of master sergeant with a compensable rating of 30%. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Jun 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01541
On 14 Sep 88, the IPEB recommended that the applicant be permanently retired from the Air Force with a combined disability rating of 100%. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant recounts his previous contentions and requested his case be administratively closed (see Exhibit E). Based upon a review of the available evidence of record and the documentation provided in support...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00508
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. There is no information to confirm he incurred injuries to his shoulders while performing combat related duties. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03642
The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit E. ODUSD(MPP)/Comp reviewed the applicant's request and concurs with the findings and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...