RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02091
INDEX NUMBER: 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow
him to reenter the military.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not under administrative action at the time of his
separation. He would like to join the guard or reserve; or
possibly go into another branch of service.
In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 Jan 01, for a
period of four years in the grade of airman. His highest grade
held was airman first class.
Applicant’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) profile follows:
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL PROMOTION EVALUATION
22 Sep 02 2 (Referral)
22 Sep 03 4
AF Form 418 (Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration), dated
22 Dec 03, reflects the applicant’s supervisor did not recommend
him for reenlistment, stating the member had shown a continual
disregard for Air Force regulations and core values. He also
stated the applicant behaved and performed at a level that was
below or just met Air Force standards and given his history of
infractions and his attitude, he did not feel the member would ever
have the desire or want to improve in any aspect of his personal
life or military career. The applicant’s unit commander concurred
with the supervisor and did not select the applicant for
reenlistment. He stated the applicant lacked the effort and desire
to try to improve. The applicant did not appeal the decision.
On 24 Jun 04, the applicant was honorably discharged under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service),
and furnished an RE code of 2X (First-term, second term, or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)). The applicant was credited
with 3 years, 5 months, and 2 days of active military service.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in
part, after a review of his military personnel record, they found
nothing to support the course of action requested by the applicant.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 27 Aug 04, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice that would warrant
a change to the applicant’s RE code. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we find no evidence, which would show the RE code assigned
was in error and after a thorough review of the evidence of record,
we do not believe he has been the victim of an injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-
02091 in Executive Session on 5 October 2004, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Jun 04, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Aug 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Aug 04.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01560
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01560 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X be removed from Item 27, Reenlistment Code, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued on 10 August 1985. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03361
In May 92, the commander permanently decertified the applicant from the PRP based on the recommendation from the MHC that, although he did not suffer any specific disorder, the applicant’s personality traits, preoccupation with personal problems, difficulty in adjusting to shift changes, and marginal motivation had not improved with treatment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRSP notes the applicant was discharged involuntarily upon expiration of term of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03058
The supervisor stated that he was unable to select the applicant for reenlistment at the time because the applicant had not demonstrated the desire or capability to accept the additional duties and responsibilities required of a career airman in today’s Air Force. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was not selected for reenlistment in the Air Force. Furthermore, it now seems that the applicant has the motivation and the desire to commit himself to the service of his country.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00382
On 11 January 1989, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment. Applicant’s performance profile follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 14 Apr 87 8 1 Dec 87 7 1 Dec 88 7 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not provided any additional information to indicate that his RE code was erroneously or unfairly assessed to his file. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01989
A resume of applicant’s available enlisted performance reports (EPR) profile follows: PERIOD CLOSING OVERALL EVALUATION 10 Nov 91 4 23 Dec 92 4 23 Dec 93 4 15 Aug 94 2 (Referral Rpt) 15 Aug 95 2 (Referral Rpt) On 14 Feb 96, applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of completion of required active service, and was issued an RE code of 2X. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted two letters of recommendation from the commander of the Air Force Band of the Golden West and the commander of the Air Force Band of Mid-America. A review of the applicant’s military personnel records revealed an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 13 Jan 99, denying him reenlistment. Therefore, as a matter of clemency, we recommend that the applicant’s RE Code be changed to “3K.” This is a code that can be waived...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02067
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 March 1991, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years. An RE code 2X (First-term airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) was assigned. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007- 02067 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...