RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02558
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires his RE code changed to allow him to enlist in the Air Force
Reserve. He states that he has no evidence to support his claim.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 July 1995 in the grade
of airman basic.
On 22 July 1998 the applicant was permanently decertified from performing
Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) duties. The decision was based on a
recommendation from Base Family Advocacy due to a demonstrated pattern of
unreliable behavior both on and off duty. The unreliable behavior includes
being late for duty, littering the dorm, having a pet in the dorm,
delinquent account, and spousal abuse.
On 5 February 1999, the applicant requested an early separation for
miscellaneous/general reasons.
On 15 March 1999, the commander approved the applicant’s request for early
separation.
Applicant was discharged on 15 March 1999, in the grade of senior airman
with an honorable discharge, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208
(Miscellaneous/General Reasons). He served a total of 3 years, 8 months
and 11 days of total active military service.
The applicant received an RE code of “2X” - First term airman considered
but not selected under Selected Reenlistment Program (SRP).
EPR profile reflects the following:
PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL
4 Mar 97 3
4 Feb 98 4
4 Feb 99 2 (Referral)
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial. They indicated that a review of the
applicant’s records revealed that the applicant was separated honorably,
but under miscellaneous/general reasons. The applicant was disqualified by
his commander from the performance of duties under the Nuclear Weapons
Personnel Reliability Program (PRP), based on recommendation from Base
Family Advocacy due to a demonstrated pattern of unreliable behavior both
on and off duty. His unreliable behavior included being late for duty,
littering the dorm, having a pet in the dorm, delinquent account, and
spousal abuse. The applicant was approved for miscellaneous separation on
22 February 1999. Subsequently, on 2 March 1999, the applicant received a
Referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) as a result of his substandard
behavior.
The applicant’s records reflect a pattern of misconduct that is consistent
with the commander’s decision to nonselect him for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program. The RE code “2X” is correct.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 January 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice warranting a change in the
applicant’s RE code. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission
in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. The Board believes that responsible officials applied
appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and the Board does not
find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that
applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of
discharge. As a result, the applicant’s RE code accurately reflects that
he was apparently considered but not selected for reenlistment. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-02558
in Executive Session on 20 February 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Mary J. Johnson, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 August 2002.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 January 2003.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 January 2003.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03361
In May 92, the commander permanently decertified the applicant from the PRP based on the recommendation from the MHC that, although he did not suffer any specific disorder, the applicant’s personality traits, preoccupation with personal problems, difficulty in adjusting to shift changes, and marginal motivation had not improved with treatment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRSP notes the applicant was discharged involuntarily upon expiration of term of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00561
On 4 Oct 05, the applicant’s commander notified her via an AF Form 286A, “Notification of Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program Permanent Decertification/Disqualification Action,” he was concurring with the recommendation of the medical authority to permanently decertify her from the PRP. Air Force Form 418, dated 29 Sep 04, which indicates she was selected for reenlistment just 13 months prior to the AF Form 418 dated 28 Oct 05 denying her reenlistment. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01211
The initial DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with the applicant’s 15 Jul 91 separation reflected the narrative reason for separation as “Return from overseas within 30 days of expiration term of service,” with separation code “K14,” and RE Code 4D (Grade is senior airman and member has completed at least nine years of total active service and had not yet been selected for staff sergeant). At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, he/she is furnished an RE code predicated upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01262
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 August 1994, for a period of four years in the grade of airman first class (E-3). The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his assigned RE code is in error or contrary to the prevailing instruction. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01027 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to allow reenlistment. Prior to 16 October 1998, his denial of reenlistment,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2000.03350
3A031 – Information Management Apprentice, 9 mos On 14 Aug 99, he was honorably discharged, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service), and was issued an RE code of 4G (No AFSC awarded that is commensurate with grade). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant contends that he did not realize he had been reassigned to AFSC 3A031,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01989
A resume of applicant’s available enlisted performance reports (EPR) profile follows: PERIOD CLOSING OVERALL EVALUATION 10 Nov 91 4 23 Dec 92 4 23 Dec 93 4 15 Aug 94 2 (Referral Rpt) 15 Aug 95 2 (Referral Rpt) On 14 Feb 96, applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of completion of required active service, and was issued an RE code of 2X. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01989 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...