RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00382
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow him to
rejoin the Armed Forces.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to early 1990 strength reduction he was given RE code 2X; however,
since 2000, the Air Force has called back prior service personnel even from
other components of the Armed Forces. In view of this, his RE code should
be changed to reflect that he can rejoin the military, complete twenty
years of service, serve his country, and earn a benefit.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 15 April 1986 for a
period of four years. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman
first class (E-3).
He was medically cleared for entry into the Weight Management Program
(WMP). His maximum allowable weight (MAW) was 196 ½ pounds and his current
weight was 201 pounds.
On 11 January 1989, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment.
His supervisor noted that since 1988, he had received four Letters of
Reprimand (LORs) for disrespect, unsatisfactory progress on the WMP,
failure to go, and acts unbecoming of a military member. In addition, his
performance had been less than satisfactory on occasion.
The commander denied his reenlistment on 12 January 1989. He did not
appeal the denial of his reenlistment.
He was honorably discharged on 31 January 1990, under the Early Separation
Program - Strength Reduction and issued an RE code of 2X (First term,
second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment
under SRP). He completed 3 years, 9 months, and 16 days of active service.
Applicant’s performance profile follows:
PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE
14 Apr 87 8
1 Dec 87 7
1 Dec 88 7
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
the applicant has not provided any additional information to indicate that
his RE code was erroneously or unfairly assessed to his file.
The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 4 April 2003 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the applicant’s RE
Code. In this respect, we note that the applicant’s discharge appears to be
in compliance with the governing Air Force Regulation in effect at the time
of his separation and that he was afforded all the rights to which
entitled. Furthermore, he provides no evidence that his separation was
inappropriate or that the assigned RE Code reflecting that he was
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective
Reenlistment Program (SRP) was in error or unjust. There being
insufficient evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00382
in Executive Session on 22 May 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Jan 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 28 Mar 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 03.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01222
He remained in the WMP for a period of 2 years and 10 months, during which time he received 2 LORS, control roster action, and demotion to the grade of sergeant for his failure to maintain Air Force weight standards. His military medical records indicate that during two separate separation physical examinations he was found medically qualified for separation and had described his health as very good, with no health problems. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01560
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01560 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X be removed from Item 27, Reenlistment Code, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued on 10 August 1985. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02091
On 24 Jun 04, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service), and furnished an RE code of 2X (First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, after a review of his military...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00382
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. At the time of the applicants discharge he received an erroneous RE code of 4I. While the 4I RE code is technically incorrect, the applicant has provided no evidence to support his request for a code that would allow him to reenlist.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03058
The supervisor stated that he was unable to select the applicant for reenlistment at the time because the applicant had not demonstrated the desire or capability to accept the additional duties and responsibilities required of a career airman in today’s Air Force. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was not selected for reenlistment in the Air Force. Furthermore, it now seems that the applicant has the motivation and the desire to commit himself to the service of his country.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03361
In May 92, the commander permanently decertified the applicant from the PRP based on the recommendation from the MHC that, although he did not suffer any specific disorder, the applicant’s personality traits, preoccupation with personal problems, difficulty in adjusting to shift changes, and marginal motivation had not improved with treatment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRSP notes the applicant was discharged involuntarily upon expiration of term of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01262
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 August 1994, for a period of four years in the grade of airman first class (E-3). The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his assigned RE code is in error or contrary to the prevailing instruction. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...