Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00843
Original file (BC-2003-00843.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00843
            INDEX CODE: 128.14
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX   HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be reimbursed for premiums paid  on  her  Family  Servicemember’s  Group
Life Insurance (FSGLI).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was not notified on 1 November 2001 that there was  a  change.   If  she
had know of the change and that it affected her and her  spouse,  she  would
have declined coverage.

The applicant provided no evidence in support of her appeal.  The
applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on active  duty  in  the  rank  of  first
lieutenant (O-2).  Her Total Active  Federal  Military  Service  Date  is  9
December 1998.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied.  On 8  April  2003,  AFPC/DPW
notified the applicant that they were  unable  to  process  her  application
without additional documentation.  DPW requested a copy  of  her  leave  and
earnings statement for the period of the alleged error, a copy of  her  SGLV
8286A, Family  Coverage  Election  Certificate,  and  any  documentation  to
support her claim.  The applicant did not respond; therefore, DPW  indicates
the applicant has  not  provided  the  information  needed  to  sufficiently
evaluate her claim.  The DPW evaluation is attached at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________





APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9  June
2003 for review and response (Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The applicant was properly charged with  a
debt as a result  of  the  passage  of  Public  Law  106-419,  Section  312,
effective 1 April 2001, which automatically  increased  the  level  of  SGLI
coverage.  Since the applicant did not provide  the  additional  information
requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim,  it  is  our  opinion
that no basis exists to reimburse the  premiums  withheld.   Therefore,  the
applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

           Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chairman
           Mr. Jackson Hauslein Jr., Member
           Mr. Edward Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR  Docket  Number
BC-2003-00843:







   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Oct 02.
   Exhibit B.  Letters, ARPC/DPW, dated 27 Jan 03 w/atch.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Feb 03.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393

    Original file (BC-2003-01393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01091

    Original file (BC-2003-01091.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02018

    Original file (BC-2003-02018.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03984

    Original file (BC-2002-03984.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her application, the applicant submits a copy of her Family Coverage Election form, dated 4 October 2002; and a copy of her leave and earnings statement, dated 1-30 November 2002. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim, it is our opinion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00548

    Original file (BC-2003-00548.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00548 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of 1 November 2001. DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02449

    Original file (BC-2003-02449.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862

    Original file (BC-2002-03862.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00179

    Original file (BC-2003-00179.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00179 in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02748

    Original file (BC-2003-02748.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided copies of her Leave and Earning Statement (LES) for the period December 2002 through February 2003 The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPW indicates that the applicant failed to respond to their 26 September 2003 letter, requesting additional documentation to evaluate her claim. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00116

    Original file (BC-2003-00116.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 April 2003, for review and comment. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the FSGLI premiums she paid from November 2001 to December 2002. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 03.