RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03710
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
(FSGLI) premiums deducted from his pay.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was never notified that FSGLI applied to active duty military members
with an active duty spouse already covered under the Servicemembers’ Group
Life Insurance (SGLI).
The applicant states that when the program was implemented, they were led
to believe that they were not part of the automatic coverage. This was
further justified when the $9.00 fee never showed up on their Leave and
Earnings Statements (LESs). When they completed a Permanent Change of
Station (PCS) to Laughlin AFB, the fee showed up with retroactive charges.
Apparently, their losing base had failed to enter the proper code to show
them as joint spouse and exempt from the program. The PCS uncovered the
mistake.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of captain.
On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was
implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to
provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for
their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance. The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined
the coverage.
On 7 October 2002, the applicant completed an SGLV 8286A, electing to
decline FSGLI coverage for his spouse.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied. ARPC/DPW states, in part,
that the Air Force aggressively campaigned to make members aware of the
FSGLI program and their benefits. Specific instructions were also provided
to all Air Force bases on the procedures they needed to follow in order to
ensure that military married to other military members were properly
charged for this new benefit. The Air Force fully complied with the law by
providing information in advance of implementations so that members could
make an informed decision. In addition to comments about FSGLI appearing
in the remarks section of every member’s Leave and Earning Statement (LES)
from 30 August 2001 through 15 November 2001, officials at the applicant’s
base also provided information to all members through their unit’s
commander’s support staff as an additional step to educate the community.
He has not provided any documentation to indicate that he was not aware of
the change and his responsibility to make an election decision.
The AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He is not contesting the fact that information regarding FSGLI was
contained in the remarks section of his LESs; his issue is with not being
charged the premiums until he owed $99.00. Unlike other individuals in his
squadron who immediately began having premiums deducted in the fall of
2001, his premiums were not deducted until 11 months later. Thus,
according to his LES, he was not enrolled in FSGLI, since premiums were not
being deducted from his pay. If he had seen the $9.00 premium on his LES,
he would have immediately gone to his finance office to resolve the
situation. Furthermore, the advisory opinion’s reference to an article in
his base paper is irrelevant since he left the base in May 2002 and the
article was published in September 2002 - after he had departed.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence
of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we believe he may
have been misled regarding his FSGLI eligibility. In this respect, we note
that although the applicant was automatically enrolled in the FSGLI,
premiums were not initially deducted from his pay. Since his LESs
indicated that FSGLI premiums were not being deducted from his pay, we
believe it was reasonable for him to believe that he was not enrolled in
the FSGLI. He states that had he seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted
from his pay, he would have taken action to decline coverage. Therefore,
we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 25 October 2001, he executed SGLV
- 8286A, Family Coverage Election, declining coverage for his spouse,
effective 1 November 2001.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-03710
in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Nov 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 14 Feb 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Feb 03.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2002-03710
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 25 October 2001, he
executed SGLV - 8286A, Family Coverage Election, declining coverage for his
spouse, effective 1 November 2001.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03709
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03709 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03709
Apparently, Mountain Home AFB had failed to enter a code in their records to show joint spouse and exemption from SGLI spouse coverage. There is no declination statement in the member’s record. No premiums were deducted from her pay until she arrived at Laughlin AFB in September 2002.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums he paid for the period of 1 August 2002 through 31 January 2003. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00127
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00127 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to show he declined Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) coverage, and he be reimbursed for the premiums deducted from his pay in January, February, March, April, May and June 2002. Since the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03316
The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined the coverage. In September 2003, he completed an SGLV 8286A, electing to decline FSGLI coverage for his spouse. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-03316 in Executive Session on 20 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member The...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02212
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14, established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02213
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Member Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay during the period from 1 November 2001 through 28 February 2002. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 5 June 2001,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665
On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03863
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, he went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that he did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...