RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01222
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: PAUL WEKENMANN
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 OCT 2006
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive a military retirement.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He lost his retirement through no fault of his own and was forced out with
16 years of military service due to being ten pounds over his maximum
allowable weight.
His health problems caused his weight gain and he was placed in the Weight
Management Program (WMP). He took drastic measures to insure he kept his
job, which resulted in more medical problems. This caused stress for he
and his family, especially considering they had a child that had Down
syndrome with a heart murmur that was going to require surgery. He finally
missed a weight check by a few pounds and was reduced in grade and
discharged. Although his service was characterized as honorable, he
received a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code that rendered him ineligible
for reenlistment in any branch of the service.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard (ANG) on 11 December 1971. He
served on active duty from 2 January 1972 to 1 May 1972, from 9 September
1972 to 23 September 1972, from 21 July 1973 to 4 August 1973, and from 20
July 1974 to 3 August 1974. He was honorably discharged from the ANG on
26 February 1975 and contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air
Force on 27 February 1975. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
staff sergeant.
On 13 November 1984, he was medically evaluated and received diet
counseling. His weight was 176 ¼ pounds, exceeding his maximum allowable
weight (MAW) of 172 pounds by 4 ¼ pounds. He was entered into the Weight
Management Program (WMP) on 14 November 1984.
He underwent a separation physical on 19 February 1986 and was found
qualified for world wide service. On that date, his weight was 197 pounds,
25 pounds over his maximum allowable weight of 172.
On 19 March 1986, his supervisor recommended him for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP); however, on 20 March 1986, the unit
commander did not select him for reenlistment due to his recent duty
performance and his past substandard bearing and behavior as evidenced by
the overall 7 rating on his last Airman Performance Report (APR) closing
out 28 February 1986, a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) issued on 19 February
1985 for failure to go and show satisfactory progress on the Weight
Management Program (WMP), control roster action, a 12 August 1985 LOR for
failure to show satisfactory progress on the WMP, and an Article 15 imposed
on 24 June 1985 for failure to go. On 5 September 1986, his supervisor
recommended him for reenlistment again under the SRP; however, the unit
commander did not select him.
He underwent a another separation physical on 24 September 1986, and was
found qualified for world wide service. His weight was 170 pounds, 2
pounds under his MAW of 172 pounds. Item 8, Statement of Examinee’s
Present Health and Medications Currently Used, on the Report of Medical
History, dated 24 September 1986, completed by the applicant indicates
“excent (sic) condition…no medication.”
A Nutritional Assessment (For Diet Counseling), dated 15 December 1986,
indicates he gained 20 pounds in the last 2 months.
Effective 23 January 1987, he was demoted from the grade of staff sergeant
(E-5) to the grade of sergeant (E-4). He appealed the demotion; however,
his appeal was denied. The specific reasons for the action were as
follows:
a. On 14 November 1984, he was properly entered into Phase I of
the WMP weighing 187 ½ pounds with a maximum allowable weight of 172
pounds.
b. On 6 February 1985, he failed to lose six pounds during a 60-
day period.
c. On 2 August 1985, he failed to lose five pounds during a 30-day
period.
d. On 21 November 1986, he failed to maintain his weight below his
maximum allowable weight.
He underwent another separation physical on 19 February 1987, and was found
qualified for world wide service. On that date, his weight was 197 pounds,
exceeding his MAW of 172 pounds by 25 pounds. In a Report of Medical
History, dated 19 February 1987, the applicant described his present health
as very good with no health problems.
He was honorably discharged on 30 April 1987, under the provisions of AFR
39-10 (Early Separation Program – Strength Reduction) and issued RE code 2X
(First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the SRP). He completed 12 Years, 2 months, and 4 days
of active service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
applicant’s discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and the Fiscal Year 1987 (FY87)
Enlisted Early Release Program (EERP). Under the FY87 EERP second-term and
career airmen assigned to the Continental United States (CONUS) with less
than 16 years service who had a date of separation (DOS) in August or
September 1987 and an RE Code of 2, 3, or 4 had to separate between 16 and
30 April 1987. Based on his DOS of 28 September 1987 and since he had less
than 16 years of service, he met the criteria established by the FY87 EERP.
The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant and his
counsel on 15 July 2005, for review and comments. However, as of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note that prior to
his separation under the FY87 EERP, the applicant was medically evaluated,
received diet counseling, and was placed in Phase I of the WMP. He
remained in the WMP for a period of 2 years and 10 months, during which
time he received 2 LORS, control roster action, and demotion to the grade
of sergeant for his failure to maintain Air Force weight standards. He was
non-selected for reenlistment under the SRP due to his duty performance,
substandard bearing and behavior, and for his failure to show satisfactory
progress in the WMP. Although the applicant contends that his medical
problems prevented his satisfactory progress in the WMP, he provides no
evidence to support this claim. In addition, he previously raised this
issue in his appeal of the demotion action taken against him and after
reviewing his written submission, the commander determined he should be
demoted. His military medical records indicate that during two separate
separation physical examinations he was found medically qualified for
separation and had described his health as very good, with no health
problems. Although he was unable to successfully maintain his weight
within Air Force standards while on the WMP, on several occasions he
demonstrated his ability to lose weight. In view of the above, and in the
absence of evidence that his placement on the WMP and denial of
reenlistment under the SRP were improper, we find no basis upon which to
favorably consider this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-01222
in Executive Session on 30 August 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 7 Jul 05.
Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jul 05.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
On 20 May 1997, the applicant received an LOR for failure to reduce body fat or weight at the rate described for satisfactory progress in accordance with AFI 40-502, the WMP. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRRP, also reviewed this application and states that the law which allows for advancement of enlisted members of the Air Force, when their active service plus service on the retired list totals...
Applicant continued in t h e WMP and on 19 October 1990, he received a Letter of Counseling for being 29 % pounds over his MAW. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Acting Chief , Commander's Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, states that maintaining Air Force weight standards is an individual responsibility. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states, in summary, that he is not questioning whether the Air Force had the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02510
On 22 January 1988, his commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge due to his unsatisfactory performance, exceeding weight standards, according to Air Force Regulation 39-10, under the provisions of paragraph 5-26f. On 26 February 1988, the discharge authority accepted the conditional waiver and directed the applicant be honorably discharged without P&R The applicant was discharged effective 4 March 1988 with a honorable characterization of service, a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03431
A Report of Individual Counseling dated 6 Nov 87 indicated the applicant had been advised he was being considered for discharge for failure to progress in the WMP. On 8 Feb 88, he was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend discharge for failure to progress in the WMP. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS provide their rationale for recommend denial.
On or about 22 Nov 85, he failed to progress satisfactorily in the Air Force WMP by gaining 10 pounds instead of losing the 5 pounds required. On 30 Jan 89, the commander, Air Refueling Wing, , received the proposed demotion case against the applicant and agreed with the applicant’s commander that demotion action was appropriate, effective 30 Jan 89. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application...
When the Air Force came out with the Early Retirement Program, he discovered he was ineligible because of the needs of the Air Force. On 11 September 1995, the SJA recommended approval of the discharge action with an honorable discharge without P&R and that the separation authority recommend to the Secretary of the Air Force that he not receive lengthy service probation. The applicant did not meet the criteria and/or standards necessary to remain on active duty and the commander took...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00382
On 11 January 1989, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment. Applicant’s performance profile follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 14 Apr 87 8 1 Dec 87 7 1 Dec 88 7 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not provided any additional information to indicate that his RE code was erroneously or unfairly assessed to his file. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01359
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge process. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal...
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, states that the applicant was demoted from staff sergeant to senior airman effective and with a date of rank of 3 June 1994 in accordance with AFR 39-30 for failure to maintain weight within Air Force standards. A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit E. The Chief, Retirements Branch, HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03414
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, states that the applicant was demoted from staff sergeant to senior airman effective and with a date of rank of 3 June 1994 in accordance with AFR 39-30 for failure to maintain weight within Air Force standards. A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit E. The Chief, Retirements Branch, HQ...