RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03473
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
__________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be given a constructive reenlistment dated 17 January 2002 for a period
of six years with a Zone B Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
__________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In 1997 he had an assignment that required retainability and he was not
given the opportunity to extend for a period between 36 and 48 months. Had
he been given this opportunity, he would have extended for 36 months.
In support of his application, he provides his 26 October 1995 and 14 April
2000 enlistment contracts and his extension of his 1995 enlistment
contract. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
__________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
indicates the applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date as 21
July 1992. He is currently serving on active duty in the grade of staff
sergeant, with an effective date of rank of 1 March 1999.
On 19 November 1997, the applicant, who had an established date of
separation of 25 October 1999, requested an extension of his initial
enlistment for a period of six months, thereby establishing a new DOS 25
April 2000.
On 14 April 2000, the applicant, who had an established date of separation
(DOS) of 25 April 2000, reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of
4 years, thereby establishing a new DOS of 13 April 2004.
__________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that on 14
April 2000, the applicant executed a valid reenlistment in order to remain
on active duty. At the time he reenlisted, his AFSC did not have a Zone B
SRB. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
__________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant responded by stating that on his AF Form 1411, Extension of
Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, it reflects that he was not afforded
the opportunity to extend his enlistment for a period of 36-48 months and
believes he was not properly counseled on his enlistment options.
Applicant’s response with a supporting letter signed by the MPF commander
is at Exhibit E.
__________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error. After a thorough review of the evidence presented,
it appears that in accordance with governing directives, Military Personnel
Flight (MPF) representatives took appropriate action in executing the
applicant’s extension by allowing him only the minimum number of months
required to qualify for his PCS assignment. Additionally, this same
directive stipulates that first-term airmen cannot extend for more than a
total of 23 months thus rendering him ineligible to extend for a period
between 36-48 months. We have noted the supportive statement provided by
the MPF commander and do not find it sufficient to show that the applicant
was entitled by either the governing Air Force instruction or policy to
extend for a period greater than 23 months. Therefore, we agree with the
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error. In the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
__________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
__________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 30 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, Member
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Oct 02 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 25 Nov 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Jan 03 w/atch.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00796
He completed an Air Force (AF) Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve; however, he never received a copy of the updated AF Form 1411. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that when the applicant signed the AF Form 1411, his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was not eligible to receive a Zone C SRB; therefore,...
The evidence of record reflects that the applicant reenlisted on 1 Dec 98. At the time of his reenlistment on 18 December 1998, he was entitled to a Zone C, Multiple 1.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with obligated service through 20 January 1999. At the time of his reenlistment on 18 December 1998, he was entitled to a Zone C, Multiple 1.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with obligated service through 20 January 1999.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01879
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant was approved for retraining into Air Traffic Control. A review of the applicant’s request indicates she has not provided any documentation indicating she was miscounseled or was entitled to other benefits she did not receive.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00288
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an assignment notification to Incirlik ABS, Turkey, and was advised that she would have to extend for 14 months to obtain retainability for this assignment. On 15 August 2003 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Air Force for a period of 4 years and 18 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03919
They recommend that the extensions executed by the applicant on 28 Sep and 28 Oct 04 be declared void and that his records be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 04, he entered into an extension for a period of 48 months, with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), Zone B, Multiple 5.5 (to be paid on the day the applicant enters the extension, provided he remains qualified). This will allow the applicant to qualify for both his assignments and, by extending the maximum of 48...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02580
AFBCMR BC-2005-02580 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02801
His AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, specifies his correct SRB skills authorization as Zone C, Multiple 2.5. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 26 Sep 07, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00358
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00358 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) payment based on a period of 4 years and 11 months as indicated on his reenlistment contract. It appears that his Zone C SRB was erroneously calculated and it was annotated on his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03775
They indicated that the applicant contends the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) failed to provide counseling regarding a pending SRB change. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 December 2002. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 December 2002.