Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00796
Original file (BC-2003-00796.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00796
            INDEX CODE:  128.05

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS:

A Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in conjunction with his  48-month
enlistment extension.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was counseled by the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) that he  would
be eligible to receive an SRB if he executed a 48-month extension.  He
completed an Air Force (AF) Form 1411, Extension  or  Cancellation  of
Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air  Force  Reserve;
however, he never received a copy of the updated AF Form 1411.  He has
subsequently learned that his enlistment remains unchanged.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his AF Form
1411, dated Oct 00, e-mail traffic and his Enlisted Performance Report
(EPR), closing 31 Oct 00.  The applicant’s complete  submission,  with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular  Air  Force
on 25 Nov 91.  He  continued  to  enlist,  with  his  last  enlistment
occurring on 2 Dec 99 for a period of four years.   An  AF  Form  1411
reveals that, on 10 Oct 00, he requested a 48-month extension of his 2
Dec 99 enlistment for the purpose of qualifying for a Permanent Change
of Station (PCS) assignment.  His extension was approved on 11 Oct 00,
changing his date of separation (DOS) of 1 Dec 03 to 1 Dec 07.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied.  DPPAE states that
the AF Form 1411, Section IX, Block 5, stipulates that the SRB payment
will be based on the SRB multiple in effect on the date  the  form  is
signed.  The SRB zone of eligibility will be determined  by  the  date
the member enters the extension.  The applicant entered Zone C  on  25
Nov 01; therefore, that is the SRB multiple he would  be  eligible  to
receive.  The SRB list, in effect as of the date the applicant  signed
the AF Form 1411, does not reflect Zone C as being authorized an  SRB.
DPPAE states that when the applicant signed the AF Form 1411, his  Air
Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was not eligible to receive a Zone C  SRB;
therefore, he is not eligible to receive an SRB  when  he  enters  his
extension in Dec 03.  The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  applicant  on  11
Apr 03 for review and response.  As of  this  date,  this  office  has
received no response (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed  as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has  failed  to  sustain
his burden that he has suffered either an error or an  injustice.   In
view of the above and absent evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 18 June 2003, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                  Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
                  Mr. Billy c. Baxter, Member
                  Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in  connection  with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-00796.

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 Feb 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 4 Apr 03.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Apr 03.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Vice Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802

    Original file (BC-2005-03802.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02801

    Original file (BC-2007-02801.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, specifies his correct SRB skills authorization as Zone C, Multiple 2.5. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 26 Sep 07, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00097

    Original file (BC-2006-00097.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was briefed that she was entitled to an SRB for the 16 months of her second extension. The extension contract provided clearly shows she was counseled she was entitled to the SRB. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the error on her one-month extension contract indicating her entitlement to an SRB, is administrative in nature and does not, in itself, authorize...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200512

    Original file (0200512.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00512 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 1411, “Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, he signed on 1 Nov 01 be voided. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813

    Original file (BC-2005-01813.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03177

    Original file (BC-2003-03177.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    An AF Form 1411 (Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve) indicates that on 17 Apr 03, the applicant extended his enlistment for eight months to qualify for a permanent change of station (PCS) assignment, changing his DOS to 21 Apr 05. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0203473

    Original file (0203473.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 April 2000, the applicant, who had an established date of separation (DOS) of 25 April 2000, reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of 4 years, thereby establishing a new DOS of 13 April 2004. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded by stating that on his AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, it reflects that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03919

    Original file (BC-2005-03919.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    They recommend that the extensions executed by the applicant on 28 Sep and 28 Oct 04 be declared void and that his records be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 04, he entered into an extension for a period of 48 months, with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), Zone B, Multiple 5.5 (to be paid on the day the applicant enters the extension, provided he remains qualified). This will allow the applicant to qualify for both his assignments and, by extending the maximum of 48...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03826

    Original file (BC-2012-03826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 Jan 10, the applicant was counseled by Military Personnel Flight (MPF) via the AF IMT 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve on his extension request and his available options. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that he was miscounseled when told he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200514

    Original file (0200514.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time the applicant requested information about reenlisting, current policy stated that a member could only reenlist 90 days prior to their expiration of term of service (ETS). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...