Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201709
Original file (0201709.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01709
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Operation “Eldorado Canyon” and should be entitled  to
the medal.

In support of his appeal, applicant provided a copy of his  DD Form
214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active  Duty)  and  a
letter from the Division of Veteran Affairs (NY).

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 5 Apr 83, applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.   He  was
promoted progressively to the grade of senior airman (E-4/SrA) with
an effective date and date of rank of 1 Apr 86.  He was transferred
to the US Air Force Reserve on 2 Apr 1987.  He completed  3  years,
11 months and 28 days of active duty service.

Applicant’s records reflect that  he  was  awarded  the  Air  Force
Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Good  Conduct  Medal,  Air  Force
Overseas Long Tour Ribbon, Air Force Training Ribbon and the  Small
Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this  application  and  recommended  denial.
Applicant served on an overseas tour for  3  years,  7  months  and
18 days.  He was assigned to the 40th  Security  Police  Flight  at
Aviano AB Italy.

The AFEM is awarded to those service members  who  participated  in
Eldorado Canyon in Libya during the period  of  12  –  17  Apr  86.
There  is  no  indication  in  applicant’s  records  that  he   had
participated in the Eldorado Canyon operation  in  Libya.   He  was
asked to provide documentation to substantiate his claim,  but  did
not respond.

Without  documentation  to  substantiate  his  claim,   applicant’s
eligibility for award  of  the  Armed  Forces  Expeditionary  Medal
cannot be verified.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 13 Sep 02 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   Applicant’s
contentions  are  duly  noted;  however,  we  do  not  find   these
uncorroborated  assertions,  in  and  by  themselves,  sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force.  We
noted that he was asked  to  provide  supporting  documentation  to
substantiate his deployment to  Libya  in  direct  support  of  the
Eldorado Canyon operations; however, he did  not  respond.   Should
the applicant provide documentation to substantiate his  claim,  we
would be willing to reconsider his petition.  Absent such evidence,
we agree with the recommendation of the Air  Force  and  adopt  the
rationale  expressed  as  the  basis  for  our  decision  that  the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden  that  he  has  suffered
either an error or an injustice.  Therefore, we find  no  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
02-01709 in  Executive  Session  on  4  February  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
      Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
      Ms. Martha Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 9 Sep 02, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Sep 02.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01357

    Original file (BC-2005-01357.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01357 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 NOVEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for her service in support of Operation ELDORADO CANYON. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03048

    Original file (BC-2006-03048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant did not provide documentation to substantiate her claim that she participated in direct support of this operation. During the time period in question the AFEM was awarded to servicemembers who served in direct support of the Libya Operation from 12 Apr 86 through 17 Apr 86. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03048

    Original file (BC-2006-03048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant did not provide documentation to substantiate her claim that she participated in direct support of this operation. During the time period in question the AFEM was awarded to servicemembers who served in direct support of the Libya Operation from 12 Apr 86 through 17 Apr 86. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01410

    Original file (BC-2003-01410.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the applicant did not provide any documentation to substantiate his claim, DPPPR recommends denying the applicant’s request for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 July 2003 for review and response (Exhibit D). There is no indication in his records that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01553

    Original file (BC-2007-01553.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01553 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 November 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to wear, at his own expense, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for participating in overseas military operations directly related to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00895

    Original file (BC-2009-00895.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS His records be corrected to reflect any award entitlements for his participation in the Libya Campaign. Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Mar 09, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04944

    Original file (BC-2012-04944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04944 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect award of the appropriate medals and boots on the ground for his service in Honduras and in support of Operation ELDORADO CANYON in Sicily. He was credited with four years of active duty service, including...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004184

    Original file (20090004184.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show any medal or badge for the Libya conflict and to show that he received his GED (General Educational Development) tests certificate [high school equivalency] during his period of active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018207

    Original file (20130018207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within specific geographic areas during specified time periods. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant was assigned to a U.S. Army unit in Germany and there is no evidence that she or her unit participated in Operation El Dorado Canyon.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01065

    Original file (BC-2007-01065.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPRA recommends the requested relief be denied. DPPPRA further state there is no indication in the applicant’s records showing support of an approved Operation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant...