Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018207
Original file (20130018207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018207 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

2.  The applicant states she is eligible for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and veterans' hiring preference in accordance with the Office of Personnel Management website and Department of Defense policy based on her service in Bad Kissingen, Germany, during the period 12-17 April 1986.  She states her unit was placed on alert 2 weeks prior to the Operation El Dorado Canyon bombing of Libya.

3.  The applicant provides an excerpt (page 37) from the Office of Personnel Management Vet Guide.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 February 1985 and held military occupational specialty 95B (Military Police).  The highest rank/grade she attained while serving on active duty was sergeant/E-5.

3.  Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) does not show any service in connection with operations in the Libyan area or Operation Eldorado Canyon.  However, this form does show she was assigned to Germany from 29 June 1985 to 10 December 1986 with the following units:

* Battery A, 1st Battalion, 1st Air Defense Artillery Regiment, from 2 July 1985 to 15 March 1986
* Battery A, 3d Battalion, 52d Air Defense Artillery Regiment, from 16 March 1986 to 10 December 1986

4.  She was honorably released from active duty on 12 February 1988.  Her DD Form 214 does not show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal or participation in Operation El Dorado Canyon in Libya.

5.  Research shows the 1986 United States bombing of Libya, code-named Operation El Dorado Canyon, comprised air strikes by the United States against Libya on Tuesday, 15 April 1986.  The attack was carried out by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps via air strikes in response to the 1986 Berlin discotheque bombing.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within specific geographic areas during specified time periods. An individual who was not engaged in actual combat or equally-hazardous activity must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in or be engaged in the direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days, provided this support involved entering the area of operations.  This regulation defines "area of operation" as the foreign territory upon which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the direct support of the designated military operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of operations; and the airspace above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.  "Direct support" is defined as services being supplied to participating forces in the area of eligibility by ground units, ships, and aircraft, provided it involves actually entering the designated area of eligibility.  This includes units, ships, and aircraft providing logistic, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support within the designated area of eligibility.  "Area of eligibility" is defined as the foreign territory on which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of the operation; and the air space above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.  Table 2-2 lists Operation El Dorado Canyon in Libya as a qualifying area for the period 12-17 April 1986.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant was assigned to a U.S. Army unit in Germany and there is no evidence that she or her unit participated in Operation El Dorado Canyon.  Furthermore, this was not an Army operation, it was conducted by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps.  Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018207



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018207



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008037

    Original file (20090008037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and a campaign medal for participation in "Operation El Dorado Canyon Libya." Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant has not submitted any evidence and his official records do not contain any evidence to show that he participated in Operation El Dorado Canyon or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01553

    Original file (BC-2007-01553.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01553 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 November 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to wear, at his own expense, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for participating in overseas military operations directly related to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011603

    Original file (20120011603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011603 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * An extract from "Wikipedia" regarding the "Contras" * A Department of the Army Summary of Cabanas 86 * A news article regarding U.S. Army engineers in Honduras * An internet article regarding a Nicaraguan incursion into Honduras * A DD Form 1610 (Request and Authorization for Temporary Duty (TDY) Travel of DOD Personnel) * A DD Form 1351-2...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01357

    Original file (BC-2005-01357.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01357 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 NOVEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for her service in support of Operation ELDORADO CANYON. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018515

    Original file (20080018515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for operations in Lebanon and Grenada. “Area of eligibility” is defined as the foreign territory on which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of the operation; and the air space above and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010186

    Original file (20120010186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA), and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) * an entry in item 18 (Remarks) documenting his service in Honduras and El Salvador 2. His final DD Form 214 shows no foreign service in item 12f; however, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020601

    Original file (20090020601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and that she served in Bosnia-Herzegovina in support of Operations Joint Endeavor/Guard. While the certificate indicates the applicant served in support of Operation Joint Endeavor/Guard, there is insufficient corroborating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03048

    Original file (BC-2006-03048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant did not provide documentation to substantiate her claim that she participated in direct support of this operation. During the time period in question the AFEM was awarded to servicemembers who served in direct support of the Libya Operation from 12 Apr 86 through 17 Apr 86. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03048

    Original file (BC-2006-03048.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant did not provide documentation to substantiate her claim that she participated in direct support of this operation. During the time period in question the AFEM was awarded to servicemembers who served in direct support of the Libya Operation from 12 Apr 86 through 17 Apr 86. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Oct 06.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000809

    Original file (20100000809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963. While an AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963, the applicant had already been REFRAD in August 1962 and thus could not qualify for that award. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.