RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01317
INDEX NUMBER: 108.01; 110.02
COUNSEL: DAV
HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His honorable discharge on 15 August 1978, be changed to retirement by
reason of physical disability; and that the Board waive the time limitation
in the interest of justice.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After suffering from an automobile accident while on active duty, he should
have been retired with a permanent disability due to injuries to his hands,
head, neck, and back. He suffers from nerve damage, vision loss, and
numbness on the left side of his body. Due to the seriousness of his
conditions, he was heavily sedated and did not have a clear head at all
times during his remaining service from March to August 1978.
To the best of his knowledge, he was approached by officers from the Staff
Judge Advocate’s office who advised him that he could either take a regular
discharge or experience a long drawn-out medical board proceeding to
determine the type of discharge he should receive. He was very young,
inexperienced, and naïve and respected authority, so he relied on their
information and accepted the regular discharge. He does not recall if
there were military experts or National Service Veteran Organizations on
the base to explain to him all of the options of discharge and retirement.
Perhaps he should have asked more questions but he was heavily medicated
and worried about the effect his permanent injuries would have on his
future. He has lived with pain on a daily basis; has lost strength in his
left arm and leg; and has extremely painful headaches, loss of vision, and
fainting spells that occur mostly without warning. In view of the fact
that he was not provided proper counseling from the Air Force, and was
under heavy sedation for his multiple permanent injuries which affected his
ability to comprehend the various types of separations available, he feels
that changing his honorable discharge to retirement by reason of physical
disability is warranted and in the best interest of justice (Exhibit A).
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 August 1974. He was
promoted to the grade of E-4, effective 1 May 1977. He was separated on 15
August 1978, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, with an honorable
discharge. He had served 4 years on active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to the applicant’s medical
condition are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices
of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in
this Record of Proceedings.
As of 17 March 1999, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) has awarded
the applicant a service-connected disability rating of 30 percent for
Residuals, Fracture of the Odontoid Process of C2 with Surgical Fusion and
Brown-Sequard Syndrome; 20% for Weakness, Left (Minor) Upper Extremity; and
10% for Weakness, Left Lower Extremity for a combined compensable
disability rating of 50%.
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The BCMR Medical Consultant’s review of the applicant’s medical records
revealed sufficient evidence to support favorable consideration of his
request. The applicant sustained a serious neck fracture that resulted in
significant residual impairment of his neck flexibility and muscle strength
and sensation of his left arm and leg. At the time of his discharge from
the hospital in late July 1978, he continued to have these residual
effects, and no Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was felt necessary, contrary
to AFR 160-43 (now AFI 48-123), which is specific in detailing when an MEB
will be convened when neurological deficits, such as the applicant
exhibited, are present. While the applicant felt he could perform most of
the duties associated with his AFSC (“except for heavy lifting and looking
up”), his defects prevented full use of all faculties needed to perform
such duties, and his separation should have been held until his fitness for
duty was resolved in the disability evaluation system. It is unclear how
the applicant could have been considered fit to perform his assigned duties
given his physical impairments. The applicant’s case should have met a
second MEB and been referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), where
the likely outcome would have been placement on the Temporary Disability
Retired List (TDRL). Following an appropriate period of observation,
evaluation would then have disclosed permanent residual effects of the neck
injury sufficient to award a permanent disability. Considering the case in
retrospect and the evidence of record, the BCMR Medical Consultant
recommended that the applicant’s record be corrected to show he was found
unfit, effective 15 August 1978, for diagnosis of Residuals, Fracture of
the Odontoid Process of C2 with Surgical Fusion and Residual Neurologic
Deficits, with a disability rating of 30%, rated under VASRD code 5285-5290
(Exhibit C).
The Physical Disability Division, AFPC/DPPD, recommended denial. Their
discussion of the case follows.
The applicant was injured during a one-car rollover accident on 11 March
1978, in which he sustained a fracture of the odontoid process of the
cervical spine, resulting in a high cervical cord contusion and Brown-
Seguard syndrome with weakness of the left side of his body and sensory
deficit on the right side of his body. An investigation of the accident
was conducted on 16 March 1978, and it was found to be in the line of duty.
The applicant’s case was presented to an MEB at Ellsworth AFB, who
referred him to Scott AFB for observation, treatment, and disposition. He
remained at Scott AFB, where he underwent surgery and physical therapy. He
was found fit for duty and was placed on temporary physical restriction,
with L3, X3 profile. At the time of his release from Scott AFB Hospital,
he was advised that he was found fit for duty and he did not request a
board.
DPPD’s further review of the applicant’s medical records revealed a Report
of Medical History, dated 26 June 1978, just prior to his separation, which
reflects he declared his present state of health as “good health,” although
he stated he was still taking medication for pain.
A review of the AFBCMR case file was conducted by the Informal Physical
Evaluation Board (IPEB) who disagreed with the findings and conclusions of
the BCMR Medical Consultant. It was determined that, had the applicant met
an MEB and the case was subsequently reviewed by the IPEB, the Board would
have returned the applicant to duty for further observation and care based
on his improving condition as indicated in the narrative summary, dated 24
July 1978, from Scott AFB. Additionally, had the applicant been referred
to the MEB with his pending separation date of 15 August 1978, he would
have had to overcome the presumption of fitness. His medical condition at
the time of his separation did not appear to be serious, grave, or life-
threatening enough to preclude him from completing his enlistment in the
Air Force. Medical conditions that are incurred on active duty but are not
serious enough to cause the early termination of a military career are not
compensated under Title 10, USC, but may be compensated under Title 38,
USC, by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). AFPC/DPPD’s complete
evaluation is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant and his
counsel on 24 September 1999, for review and response within 30 days
(Exhibit E). The applicant noted his age and lack of knowledge of the
disability evaluation system. He believes Air Force officials were
negligent in not scheduling him for an MEB. The applicant’s complete
response is at Exhibit F.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. The majority of the Board
accepted the opinion and recommendation from the BCMR Medical Consultant,
who indicates that the proper course to be followed in the applicant’s case
would have been to present his case to an MEB followed by a PEB for
consideration. Based on the above, the Board majority believes the
applicant should have been found unfit by reason of physical disability.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommended that the applicant’s records be
corrected to show he was found unfit, effective 15 August 1978, for a
diagnosis of Residuals, Fracture of the Odontoid Process of C2 with
Surgical Fusion and Residual Neurological Deficits, with a disability
rating of 30%, rated under VASRD code 5285-5290. We agree. Therefore, the
majority of the Board recommends his records be corrected as indicated
below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 14 August 1978, he was found unfit to perform the duties of
his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical disability,
incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnoses in his
case are Residuals, Fracture of the Odontoid Process of C2 with Surgical
Fusion and Residual Neurological Deficits, VASRD Codes 5285-5290, rated at
30%; the total combined compensable rating was 30%; the disability was
permanent; the disability was not due to intentional misconduct or willful
neglect; the disability was not incurred during a period of unauthorized
absence; the disability was incurred in the line of duty; the disability
was incurred during a period of national emergency; and the disability was
not the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of
war
b. He was not released from active duty on 15 August 1978, but was
permanently retired by reason of physical disability, effective 16 August
1978.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 27 April 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to grant the application.
Mr. Markiewicz voted to deny the request on the basis of timeliness, noting
that the applicant was discharged over 20 years ago. Mr. Markiewicz did
not believe it would be in the interest of justice to waive the applicant’s
failure to timely file. However, he did not wish to submit a minority
report.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Dec 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 21 Jul 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 7 Sep 99.
Exhibit E. Letters, SAF/MIBR, dated 24 Sep 99.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 7 Oct 99.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 99-01317
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 14 August 1978, he was found unfit to perform the duties
of his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical disability,
incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnoses in his
case are Residuals, Fracture of the Odontoid Process of C2 with Surgical
Fusion and Residual Neurological Deficits, VASRD Codes 5285-5290, rated at
30%; the total combined compensable rating was 30%; the disability was
permanent; the disability was not due to intentional misconduct or willful
neglect; the disability was not incurred during a period of unauthorized
absence; the disability was incurred in the line of duty; the disability
was incurred during a period of national emergency; and the disability was
not the direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of
war.
b. He was not released from active duty on 15 August 1978, but
was permanently retired by reason of physical disability, effective 16
August 1978.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00840
The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated limitation of cervical motion, s/p cervical fracture w/c1/2 fusion as unfitting, rating it 20%; with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The FPEB rated the CI’s neck condition 10%.
They found him unfit for the rigors of military service and recommended discharge with severance pay with a 20% compensable disability rating. A copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant and counsel on 25 August 2000, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). Accordingly, we recommend that the...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00692
The CI’s enlistment exam, performed 26 months prior to separation, reported one-level cervical fusion (C2-3), with “no sequelae.” ROMs were painless, and were full in all directions except rotation, with a combined ROM of 300⁰ (normal 340⁰). All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting addition of any upper extremity radiculopathy (peripheral nerve) as an unfitting condition for separation rating. Service Treatment Record
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00020
The condition was rated at 0%. Based on this information, the FPEB rated her neck condition as “moderate” limitation of motion of the cervical spine at 20%. All exams documented cervical motion limitation which could be considered either moderate or severe.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02501
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic subjective neck pain, due to C2 odontoid fracture…without neurologic abnormality or limitation of motion”as unfitting, rated 10%. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Subjective Neck Pain…without Neurologic Abnormality523510%Residuals, Odontoid Cervical Spine Fracture523520%20060118 20060208Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 720060118 20060208 Combined: 10%Combined: 40% *Derived...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00119
Also, the 2001 Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine was in effect at the time of TDRL entry and the 2003 VASRD was in effect for the TDRL exit rating (the current §4.71a rating standards were adopted on 26 September 2003). The examiner noted “extreme difficulty transitioning from a seated to a standing position,” temporary abnormal posture after standing, and “unable to extend his knees or flex his hips against resistance...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01020
SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (88M10 / Motor Transport), medically separated for chronic neck pain operative residuals for left C7 radiculopathy with C4/5 and C5/6 degenerative disc disease (DDD). ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Neck Pain …5099-50030%Status Post Cervical Spine Fusion Secondary to Large Osteophytes and Spine Stenosis of Cervical...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00089
The examiner’s summary of ROMs in the chart above was from the physical exam section of the C&P exam and was slightly different than the summary area ROMs (no ratable difference), which stated, “Loss of flexion of 22 degrees, extension of 10 degrees, left lateral flexion of 15 degrees and right lateral flexion of 10 degrees.” Although remote from separation, the Board noted that four subsequent VA exams at 38, 55, 77, and 87 months post-separation showed significantly greater ROM deficits...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01101
Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20020614 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Back Pain 5299-5295 10% L4-L5 Spondylolithesis s/p fusion 5299-5292 10% 20021227 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. VA radiographs (over 20 months after surgery) stated There is wedging of L5. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Back Pain After...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01412
The PEB coded chronic low back pain 5295 (lumbosacral strain and pain on motion) and rated it 10% based on IAW DOD and VASRD guidelines. At the MEB exam of 25June2002 the CI reported no neck pain or cervical paresthesias. Neither charted exam was compensable based on ROM limitations.