RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01373
INDEX CODE: 108.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His disability discharge with severance pay and a 20% disability
rating be set aside, and he be granted retirement by reason of
physical disability.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In 1999, the Air Force discharged him with a disability rating of 20%.
The DVA has since given him a 70% disability rating. He believes
that because he will have the disability for the rest of his life, he
should have access to base facilities; i.e., commissary, BX, and MWR.
There is a considerable difference in the disability ratings.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits copies of the DVA
rating decisions.
Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant received a medical evaluation on 25 March 1998. On
29 October 1998, the medical summary was reviewed by the Medical
Evaluation Board (MEB) for the purpose of continued active duty. The
MEB rendered diagnoses of Condylar Hypoplasia with Basilar
Invagination, S/P Decompression and Occiput to C3 Fusion, with
Resolution of Most Brain Stem Findings and Return of Positional
Vertigo; Positional Vertigo; S/P Tracheostomy and Posterior Cervical
Fusion; and Chronic Neck Pain and Headache Related to Skull-based
Abnormalities and Post-Op Change. The MEB determined that the
applicant’s case should be referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation
Board (IPEB). On 17 November 1998, the IPEB found his medical
condition impacted his ability to perform duties commensurate with his
office, grade, rank or rating. The IPEB further noted that in spite
of treatment, it had persisted. They found him unfit for the rigors
of military service and recommended discharge with severance pay with
a 20% compensable disability rating. Conditions that could be
unfitting but were not currently compensable or ratable: Palatal
insufficiency with secondary speech dysphasia, VASRD 8299-8212. On 30
November 1998, the applicant concurred with the findings and
recommended disposition of the IPEB.
On 13 January 1999, the applicant was honorably discharged from active
duty, for physical disability under the provisions of AFI 36-3212,
with a combined compensable rating of 20% for Condylar Hypoplasia with
Basilar Invagination, Status Post Transoral, Transpalalal
Decompression and Occiput-To-C3 Fusion with Following Residual Medical
Conditions, since 1997: Chronic Neck Pain with Associated Headaches,
VASRD 5290; and Positional Vertigo, VASRD 6299-6204. He completed
8 years, 1 month and 14 days of active service.
In a Rating Decision dated 8 February 2000, the Department of Veterans
Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a combined compensable disability
rating of 70% for Post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression and
panic disorder (50%), effective 14 January 1999; Residuals status post
cervical spine laminectomy and fusion with tension headaches due to
compression of the pontine medullary junction (20%), effective 14
January 1999; Positional vertigo due to compression of the pontine
medullary junction (10%), effective 14 January 1999; Palatal
insufficiency with nasal sounding speech due to tracheostomy with a
transoral transpalatal resection of the inferior portion of the
odontoid and the retro-odontoid pannus (0%), effective 14 January
1999; Scars on head from halo pins and on neck from tracheostomy (0%),
effective 14 January 1999; Scars, hip area, posterior neck, shoulder,
mid-chest and from left inguinal hernia repair (0%), effective 14
January 1999; and Residuals, left ankle strain (10%), effective 14
January 1999. Service connection for malocclusion correction was
denied.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters
prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant developed
neurological signs and symptoms that led to a diagnosis of brain stem
compression from a skeletal defect that caused his upper cervical
spine to impinge on the brain stem. These problems began in early
1996 and in May 1997, he underwent extensive neurosurgical procedures
to relieve the compression and stabilize his neck by spinal fusion.
The surgery was very successful in relieving the symptoms, but he was
left with residual headaches, a stiff neck from the fusion, some
dysfunction of his palate that created some difficulty with speech and
swallowing, and some dizziness associated with position. Because the
residual effects interfered with the performance of his duties as an
avionics technician, he was presented to an MEB on 29 October 1998,
and referred to the IPEB on 17 November 1998. Recommendation was for
separation with severance pay and 20% disability for residuals of
chronic neck pain with associated headaches, and positional vertigo.
He accepted the recommendation and was discharged with $22,245.35 in
severance pay. Records show a single mental health clinic visit in
November 1997, some 6 months after the surgery, for what was felt to
be an adjustment disorder with depressed mood relating to the surgery
and its after effects. Removal of his stabilizing hardware on that
same day relieved much of his pain, and he did not feel the need for
further counseling. There was nothing found to suggest the later-
diagnosed PTSD that the DVA now compensates him for.
Since discharge, the applicant has been followed by the DVA, who
currently rates him at a combined rating of 70%, which generously
includes 50% for PTSD related to his surgical interventions, 20% for
the spine fusion with headaches, 10% for residuals of a left ankle
strain suffered in 1995, and 10% for the vertigo. Because of this
rating, the applicant believes he should have received a medical
disability retirement. For an individual to be considered unfit for
military service, there must be a medical condition so severe that it
prevents the performance of any work commensurate with rank and
experience. Once this determination is made, namely that the
individual is unfit, disability rating percentage is based on the
member’s condition at the time of permanent disposition. Congress
recognized that a person can acquire physical conditions that,
although not unfitting at the time of separation, may later progress
in severity and alter the individual’s lifestyle and future
employability. With this in mind, the DVA compensation system was
written to allow awarding compensation ratings for conditions that are
not unfitting for military service. This is the reason an individual
can be found disabled at a certain level, and yet soon thereafter,
receive a higher compensation rating from the DVA for service-
connected, but militarily not unfitting condition. Evidence of record
establishes beyond all reasonable doubt that the applicant was
properly evaluated and rated, that the level of compensation awarded
prior to his separation was proper, and that no error or injustice
occurred in this case.
The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records
is warranted and the application should be denied.
A copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
The Chief, Special Actions/BCMR Advisories, USAF Physical Disability
Division, HQ AFPC/DPPD, states that a thorough review of the case file
revealed no errors or irregularities in the processing of applicant’s
case within the military disability evaluation system. Records
clearly reflect that he was properly rated under federal disability
guidelines, and that he was afforded a full and fair hearing required
under military disability laws and policy. The medical aspects of the
case are fully explained by the BCMR Medical Consultant, and DPPD
agrees with his evaluation.
A copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
and counsel on 25 August 2000, for review and response within 30 days
(Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice warranting partial relief of
the applicant’s request. We noted the disparity in the percent of
disability from the Department of Veterans Affairs (70%) as compared
with the Air Force (20%). While we are reluctant to substitute our
judgment for that of medical personnel who are qualified to review and
make recommendations concerning medical issues, after thoroughly
reviewing the evidence of record, we believe there is sufficient doubt
as to whether or not the applicant should have been placed on the
Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). In this respect, we note
that while on active duty, the applicant experienced chronic headaches
and neurological problems due to brain stem compression. Although
extensive neurosurgical procedures helped to relieve his symptoms, it
appears he was left with residual headaches, dizziness and difficulty
with speech and swallowing. The comments of the Air Force evaluators
are noted; however, based on the totality of the evidence before this
Board and in an effort to remove any possibility of an injustice, we
recommend that he be found unfit and placed on the TDRL, effective 13
January 1999. While on the TDRL, the applicant will be reevaluated
and, at the appropriate time, a final disposition will be made.
Accordingly, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 12 January 1999, he was found unfit to perform the duties
of his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical disability
incurred while entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in
his case was condylar hypoplasia with basilar invagination, status
post transoral, transpalalal decompression and occiput-to-C3 fusion
with the following residual medical conditions: (1) chronic neck pain
with associated headaches, VASRD code 5290, rated at 20%; and (2)
positional vertigo, VASRD code 6299-6204, rated at 10%; that the
combined compensable rating is 30%; that the disability may be
permanent; that the disability was not due to intentional misconduct
or willful neglect; that the disability was not incurred during a
period of national emergency; and that the disability was not received
in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict.
b. He was not discharged on 13 January 1999, but on that date,
his name was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 12 October 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Panel Chair
Mrs. Margaret A. Zook, Member
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 May 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 13 Jul 00.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 8 Aug 00.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 25 Aug 00.
PATRICK R. WHEELER
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-01373
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to, be corrected to show that:
a. On 12 January 1999, he was found unfit to perform
the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of
physical disability incurred while entitled to receive basic
pay; that the diagnosis in his case was condylar hypoplasia
with basilar invagination, status post transoral, transpalalal
decompression and occiput-to-C3 fusion with the following residual
medical conditions: (1) chronic neck pain with associated
headaches, VASRD code 5290, rated at 20%; and (2) positional
vertigo, VASRD code 6299-6204, rated at 10%; that the combined
compensable rating is 30%; that the disability may be permanent;
that the disability was not due to intentional misconduct or willful
neglect; that the disability was not incurred during a period of
national emergency; and that the disability was not received in the
line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict.
b. He was not discharged on 13 January 1999, but on that
date, his name was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List
(TDRL).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03792
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Informal Physical Evaluation Board disapproved his medical retirement for an injury incurred while serving in Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. While we determined that the applicant is not entitled to a disability retirement, sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting a correction to his record to show a...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00544
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for Deafness in Left Ear with Tinnitus, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. At this time he no longer had any vertigo, incoordination, or headaches but continued to have tinnitus, absolute hearing loss in the left ear, and left facial nerve palsy. The 2008 PEB determined the CI was unfit...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01237
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. §4.71a Rating 20% PEB 20% VA 10% cervical spine; 10% scarThe Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB assigned a 20% rating using code 5241 (spinal fusion), while the VA...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00419
The CI had symptoms of myelopathy in all four extremities. At this time the CI had symptoms of right upper extremity radiculopathy. The diagnoses in his finding of unfitness were cervical spondylotic myelopathy status post spinal fusion C3-6, rather than cervical spondylosis status post spinal fusion, VASRD code 5241, rated at 20%; right (dominant) upper extremity motor and sensory radiculopathy associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy status post spinal fusion C3-6, VASRD code...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00840
The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated limitation of cervical motion, s/p cervical fracture w/c1/2 fusion as unfitting, rating it 20%; with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The FPEB rated the CI’s neck condition 10%.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00459
After the surgery she gradually improved but still had persistent recurrent flare-ups of severe spasm and pain of the left upper back, left posterior neck that radiated to her left occiput and down her left arm. The Board considered the following conditions and unanimously concluded that none should be considered unfitting: Left Upper Extremity Radiculopathy; Lumbosacral Spine, Degenerative Joint and Disc Disease; S/P Hysterectomy; S/P Cholecystectomy; Postoperative Scar, Anterior Cervical...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00409
Flex (0-45)No goniometrics45° (50°, 52°, 56°)35⁰*Ext (0-45)No goniometrics45° (50°, 50°, 52°)45⁰R Lat Flex (0-45)No goniometrics35° (35°, 40°, 45°)40⁰*L Lat Flex (0-45)No goniometrics35° (35°, 40°, 45°)40⁰*R Rotation (0-80)No goniometrics50° (52°, 54°, 56°)80⁰L Rotation (0-80)No goniometrics50° (52°, 54°, 56°)60⁰*COMBINED (340)260⁰300⁰C-spine MRI- degenerative disc disease, osteoarthropathyTenderness centrally C3-7; Mild paraspinal tenderness; sharp pain with lateral left bending; Mild pain...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00629
If the CI were instead rated under codes for vertigo and headache, the rating would be more favorable to the CI. Minority Opinion : The Action Officer recommends separate migraine headaches and vertigo coding and rating in this case regarding the very strong evidence of the migraine headaches and vertigo as separately unfitting conditions. To say that a 10% rating more accurately reflects the disability picture of the CI, rather than the use of an alternate scheme that rates the individual...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00927
The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The Board acknowledged the VAs decision to rate the condition of BPPV with associated headaches and photophobia under the above mentioned code. In the matter of the BPPV condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 6299-6204 IAW VASRD §4.87.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00031
All of these conditions should have been found to be separately unfitting, and I ask the Board to both find them unfitting and render appropriate military disability ratings for them.” He additionally lists all of his VA conditions and ratings as per the rating chart below. Other PEB Conditions . Service Treatment Record