AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01832
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
It appears that the applicant is requesting that the reason for his
honorable discharge for hardship dependency be changed to read
honorable discharge only. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C) .
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent
persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards
were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board, Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Mr. Henry Romo Jr.,
and Mr. Kenneth L. Reinertson, considered this application on
28 January 1999 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
BARBARA A. WESTGATFO
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H A I R F O R C E B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS
550 C Street West, Suite 11
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713
The applicant, while serving in the grade of staff sergeant, was discharged from the Air
Force on 2 1 Nov 62 under the provisions of AFR 39- 13 (Hardship Dependency) with an
honorable discharge. He served 11 years 02 months 22 days total active service.
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting his honorable under hardship conditions
discharge be changed to only honorable.
Facts. Applicant applied for a dependency hardship discharge on 06 Nov 62 and hrnished
the required documentation according to AFR 39-13. His case was reviewed and was approved
by the discharge authority who directed that he receive an honorable discharge certificate.
Recommendation. This case has been reviewed for separation processing and there are no
errors or irregularities causing an injustice to the applicant. The discharge complies with
directives in effect at the time of his discharge. The records indicate member’s military service
was reviewed and appropriate action was taken. Applicant did not identi5 any specific errors in
the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the narrative reason for
discharge he received. Accordingly, we recommend his request be denied. He has not filed a
timely request.
JOHN C. WOOTEN, DAF
Military Personnel Mgmt Spec
Separations Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Management
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR L t r Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E HEADQUARTERS...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0232
Further, t h e respondent was advised o f the r i g h t s t o a hearing before an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board, t o consult and be represen- t e d by counsel, t o submit statements i n a d d i t i o n t o o r i n 1 i e u o f board hearing, o r t o waive any o f these r j g h t s . The record o f t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board and t h e case f i l e contain no e r r o r s o r i r r e g u l a r i t i e s p r e j u d i c i a l t o t h e respondent's r i g h t...
After consulting counsel, applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf requesting an honorable discharge. He had completed 1 year, 2 months and 15 days and was serving in the grade of airman (E-2) at the time of discharge. Letter to Board for Correction of Air Force Records, RE: Discharge upgrade/DD form 293, November 6, 1997 8.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Requested Action. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00030
Recommend t h a t respondent be separated with an honorable discharge, w i t h or without an o f f e r of P & R; or c. Direct t h e respondent be separated with a g e n e r a l discharge, w i t h or without an o f f e r of P & R. 6. The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, para exceeding weight standards. Copies of the documents to be forwarded t o the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00068
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DQ EE WLNG, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Her infractions included missing numerous appointments with her On-The-Job Training manager, failing to complete her Career Development Course in a timely manner after indicating to her supervisor on numerous occasions that she was progressing...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00043
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honor&e:- CASE NUMBER FDO1-00043 I . Two SSgt's and 1 Sgt., whose statements were submitted but not Issue 7: M y command abused it's authority when it decided to discharge me I was told by my commanding lieutenant an decided' to give me a bad discharge. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct - - Minor Disciplinary Infractions.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00376
R 111111111111111111 1 -.-- S1G -- --------- 2 ---- ~ TI1 F OF BOAItD Y IDENT 2 ~ 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z ' L ~ ~ ~ ~ I"' I 1 SANMKDR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 hL'CItETAR1' O F T H E AIR FORCE PERSOh3El C'Ollh('lL .AIR FOR('E DISCHAICGE HL'VIE\V BO4RD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD PI.OOR ANDREWS AFR, MU 20761-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used d AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISlONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00376 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0038
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD20024038 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner’s Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) FD2002-0038 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.