AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD20024038
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contazs
available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leadi@-@he discharge.
t
_ r -
e.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
Issues. Applicant was discharged for misconduct, namely drug abuse, and received an under other than
honorable conditions characterization of service. Member received an Article 15 for wrongfil use of
marijuana. This was based on a urinalysis, which came back positive for the presence of THC at 6lng/ml,
well above the above the DoD cut-off level of 15 ng/ml. Furthermore, although not used as a basis for the
discharge, member’s record included another incident of misconduct. While driving under the influence of
alcohol with a blood alcohol content of .24, he caused a major motor vehicle accident wherein he seriously
damaged several cars parked in a residential area, as well as injuring himself. Applicant now contends the
discharge was too harsh because it was based on one isolated incident that he now states he didn’t commit,
and for which he should not be indefinitely punished. He also notes he was undergoing personal problems,
and didn’t trust his defense counsel’s advice. At the time of the discharge member waived his right to
submit matters in his own behalf. He also submitted an unconditional waiver of his right to a board
hearing. Furthermore, at the time of the discharge, the Air Force’s drug policy was well publicized and
members were continually made aware that illegal drug use was not tolerated. The Board noted that drug
abuse is not compatible with Air Force standards; the seriousness of member’s misconduct and record of
other misconduct outweighs the applicant’s otherwise acceptable service during the period of enlistment
under review.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided fill administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board hrther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant’s discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner’s Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AB) (HGH SRA)
FD2002-0038
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 88/02/17 UP AFR 39-10,
p2ra 5-49c (Drug Abje). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
- -
4 2. BACKGROUND:
e-
=
-L%
a. DOB: 63/05/15. Enlmt Age: 20 3/12. Disch Age: 24 9/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-64, E-96, G-96, M-99. PAFSC: 12250 - Aircrew Life Support
Specialist. DAS: 87/09/15.
b. Prior Sv: none.
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as Amn 83/08/25 for 4 yrs. Svd: L Yrs 05 Mo 23 Das, all AMs.
b. Grade Status: AI3 - 88/01/27 (Article 15, 88/01/27)
Sgt - 87/06/01
SrA - 86/06/25
A1C - 84/02/25
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15's:
(1) 88/01/27, Hill AFB, UT - Article 112a. You did, within
the State of Utah, between on or about 9 Nov 87 and 13
Nov 87, wrongfully use marijuana. Reduction fo AB.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e.
Additional : none.
f. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: 83/08/25 - 84/08/24 Minot AFB
9 (Annual)
84/08/25 - 85/08/24 Minot AFB
8 (Annual)
85/08/25 - 86/08/24 Barksdale AFB 9 (Annual)
86/08/25 - 87/05/20 Barksdale AFB 9 (CRO)
(Discharged from Hill AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA, AFGCM, AFLSAR, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (04) Yrs (05) Mos (23) Das
TAMS: (04) Yrs (05) Mos (23) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/01/17.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
FD2002-0038
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Result of Urinalysis Testing.
3. Statement of Support.
4. Four Aiman Performance Reports.
--
-
a-
A
I
. ..
. .- ..
.. .. ...
i
.........
>,
..,- . I
_.
I
.
I
- . . . . . . . . . . .
.. .-
.............
. .
....
_-
. . . . . . . . .
..
.....
. . . . . . .
................
......................
...
.
~
..................
.- . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
...
.
.....
..
i
. . . .
.. ~ _ . _
.......
. . . . . . - . . . . . .
. .- . - -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . - . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
- . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.. -. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
.........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
._ ..
__
__ ........
-
.........
- .
.....
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
...
.......
-
.....
.
....
..
.....................
......
....
.. .......
-
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
....... ____ ...
.-
.
.........
..
..............
.....
. .
-~
..
.
.
. . . . . .....-I
_
.
............
.....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-.
.......
.- .....
...
....
-
.....
I
..
. - ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-. .............
.
.
.
.
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
.
.
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
....
....
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . .
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER (AFLC)
HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH 84056-5990
REPLY TO
* n N ° F
JAM-MJ
(Captain
1
SUBJECT AFR 39-10 Involuntary Discharge - Airman Basic
_ _ To 2849 ABG/DPM -
388 AGS (TAC)
a-.
2 February 1988
-
&-x=-
1. We have reviewed t h e referenced action i n accordance w i t h AFR 39-10, para-
graph 6-12a (l), and consider i t f a c t u a l l y , procedurally and l e g a l l y s u f f i -
c i e n t t o sustain a f i n d i n g t h a t the respondent comnitted a serious offense, as
contemplated by AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-49c.
2. The f a c t u a l basis f o r t h i s action i s the
t r a t i v e determination t h a t t h e respondent used marijuana
3. The s t a t u t o r y basis
Section 1169.
i n i t i a t i n g commander's adminis-
i n November 1987.
f o r t h i s action i s T i t l e 10, United States Code,
4. The
under
unconditional waiver o f h i s r i g h t t o a discharge board.
recomnends
than honorable conditions.
i n i t i a t i n g commander
other
t h a t
t h e respondent be discharged
respondent submitted an
The
(b)
f i l e
t h e case
t o t h e
f o r an honorable,
d i r e c t r e i n i t i a t i o n f o r f u r t h e r processing
separation authority,
general o r under other
I n accordance w i t h AFR 39-10, paragraph 6-17, t h e base commander i s t h e
5.
board convening authority. As such, h i s options are t o : ( a ) r e j e c t t h e waiver
recommend acceptance o f t h e waiver and
and order a board t o be convened;
forward
f u r t h e r
than honorable
recommendation
conditions discharge, w i t h o r without probation and
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n , w i t h
reasons f o r t h e recommendation;
(c) d i r e c t t h a t t h e a c t i o n be discontinued; o r
under another section o f AFR
(d)
39-10.
6. Under AFR 39-10, paragraph 6-19, the center commander i s the separation
I f the base commander recommends acceptance o f t h e unconditional
a u t h o r i t y .
(a) r e j e c t t h e unconditional
t h e center commander's options are t o :
waiver,
(b) d i r e c t retention; (c) accept the unconditional w a i v e r and order an
waiver;
general o r under other than honorable conditions discharge w i t h or
honorable,
without probation and r e h a b i l i t a t i o n ;
or (d) d i r e c t r e i n i t i a t i o n f o r f u r t h e r
processing under another section o f AFR 39-10.
with a
recommend
t h e convening a u t h o r i t y
7. We
t o t h e
separation a u t h o r i t y f o r approval o f the unconditional waiver w i t h a discharge
under other than honorable conditions, without probation and r e h a b i l i t a t i o n .
While t h e respondent's use o f marijuana could have
i n court- martial
resulted
t h a t could not be
charges, we perceive no i n t e r e s t o f j u s t i c e o r d i s c i p l i n e
the case
forward
f i l e
-
adequately
with t h e w
served by t h e
respondent's
r s t admi n i s t r a t i ve d i scharg
immediate
possible.
removal
from t h e A i r Force
8. There i s no i n d i c a t i o n probation and r e h a b i l i t a t i o n would serve any useful
purpose a t t h i s l a t e date.
9. We note no administrative e r r o r s o f l e g a l significance.
.
__
S t a f f Judge Advocate
Case F i l e
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE AIR F O R C E
388TH AIRCRAFT G E N E R A T I O N SQUADRON (TAC)
HILL AIR F O R C E BASE, U T A H 84056-5000
REPLY T O
ATTNOF:
cc
L e t t e r o f N o t i f i c a t i o n - Board Hearing
2 7 JAN 1988
I am recommending your discharge from t h e United States A i r Force f o r
1.
drug abuse. The a u t h o r i t y f o r t h i s a c t i o n i s AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-49c.
Copies o f t h e documents t o be forwarded t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y t o support
t h i s recommendation are attached.
My reason f o r t h i s a c t i o n i s your wrongful use o f marijuana as evident b y
2.
the f o l l o w i n g :
a. Between on o r about 9 November and 13 November 1987, you wrongfully used
marijuana f o r which you received an A r t i c l e 15 on 27 Jan 88.
This a c t i o n could r e s u l t i n your separation with an under other than honor-
3.
able conditions discharge.
than honorable conditions discharge.
o r a higher a u t h o r i t y w i
discharged, you w i
l
l
I am recommending t h a t you receive an under other
The commander exercising SPCM j u r i s d i c t i o n
l make t h e f i n a l decision i n t h i s matter.
l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r reenlistment i n t h e A i r Force.
I f you are
4.
You have t h e r i g h t t o :
a. Consult l e g a l counsel.
b.
Present your case t o an administrative board.
c. Be represented by l e g a l counsel a t a board hearing.
d. Submit statements i n your own behalf i n addition to, o r i n l i e u of,
board heari ng.
t h e
e. Waive t h e above r i g h t s . You must consult l e g a l counsel before making a
decision t o waive any o f your r i g h t s .
-
5. You have been scheduled f o r a medical examination.
Hospital H i l l , physical exam section, a t 0645 on 2 Feb 88.
You must r e p o r t t o USAF
:!ka6;!d~~
6. M i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel, Capt
Bldg 1278, ext 72940, has been
assist you. An appointment has been scheduled f o r you t o consult
Instead o f t h e appointed counsel,
88, a t bg%ours,
Bldg 1278.
you may have another, i f t h e lawyer you request i s i n t h e a c t i v e m i l i t a r y
service and s reasonably a v a i l a b l e as determined according t o AFM 111-1.
a d d i t i o n t o m i l i t a r y counsel, you have t h e r i g h t t o employ c i v i l i a n counsel.
The A i r Force does n o t pay expenses i n c i d e n t t o t h e employment o f c i v i l i a n
counsel. C i v i l i a n counsel,
i f employed, must be r e a d i l y available.
I n
7. Confer w i t h your counsel and reply,
i n w r i t i n g , w i t h i n 7 workdays, speci-
f y i n g t h e r i g h t s you choose t o exercise. The statement must be signed i n t h e
presence o f your counsel who also w i
l s i g n it. I f you waive your r i g h t t o a
hearing before an admi n i s t r a t i ve discharge board, you may submit w r i t t e n state-
l send t h e statements t o the discharge a u t h o r i t y
ments i n your own behalf.
w i t h t h e c a s Q f i l e t o be considered w i t h t h i s recommendation.
respond, y o w i l u r e w i
ing.
If y o k - f a i l t o
l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver o f t h e r i g h t t o t h < $ E r d hear-
--
-
I w i
l
l
l
--
7 --
A
8. Any personal information you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l i s covered b y t h e Privacy
Act Statement as explained i n AFR 39-10, attachment 6. A copy o f AFR 39-10 i s
a v a i l a b l e f o r your use i n t h e 388 AGS Orderly Room.
9. Execute t h e attached acknowledgement and r e t u r n i t t o me
imnediately.
Commander, Squadron Section
-
.
1 Atch
1. Deroqatory data contained i n
1 e t t Gr o f - n o t i f i c a t i on
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00030
Recommend t h a t respondent be separated with an honorable discharge, w i t h or without an o f f e r of P & R; or c. Direct t h e respondent be separated with a g e n e r a l discharge, w i t h or without an o f f e r of P & R. 6. The authority for this action is AFR 39-10, para exceeding weight standards. Copies of the documents to be forwarded t o the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2001-0348
/$NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) I GRADE ( AFSNISSAN I MEMBER SITTING 1 VOTE OF THE BOARD HON I GEN 1 UOTHC OTHER I DENY 3 ................................. ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 HEARING DATE 03 Jun 2004 CASE NUMBER FD-2001-0348 Case heard at Washington, D.C. X 1 2 3 4 EXHBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0232
Further, t h e respondent was advised o f the r i g h t s t o a hearing before an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board, t o consult and be represen- t e d by counsel, t o submit statements i n a d d i t i o n t o o r i n 1 i e u o f board hearing, o r t o waive any o f these r j g h t s . The record o f t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board and t h e case f i l e contain no e r r o r s o r i r r e g u l a r i t i e s p r e j u d i c i a l t o t h e respondent's r i g h t...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00263
YAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE I PERSONAL APPEARANCE * I C I x RECORD REVIEW MEMBER SITTING ISSUES I I INDEX NllMRFR HEARING DATE 19 Aug 2003 CASE NUMBER Case heard at Washington, D.C. 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATlON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION PERSONNEL FILE I COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD I ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF I PERSONAL APPEARANCE I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0050
the offense, the board's recommendation should be followed. t you recommend t o Commander, Headquarters A i r Force D i s t r i c t of IJas.hin(jton, t h a t T S q t be discha.r(jed from t h e A i r Force w i t h a n Under Conditions Discharge, wi t h o u t an award of Atch Roard Proceedings DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 7TH COMMUNICATIONS GROUP WASHINGTON DC 20330-6345 REPLY TO ATTNOF: MS suwuEcT: Notification Letter - Board Hearing 29 Apr 92 _-_ . In addition to military counsel, you...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00137
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00137 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. LOC , LOC , LOC , LOR, 25 MAY 90 19 MAY 89 20 APR 89 01 MAR 89 - Late for duty. S u p p o r t i n g Documents a AF Form 3070, s e r v e d 6 Nov 9 0 , w / a t c h b LOR, d a t e d 1 3 J u l 90 w / a t c h c LOC, d a t e d 25 May 90 d LOC, d a t e d 19 May 89 e...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00179
Applicant statement to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. The one thing that makes life easier to deal with is my relationship with God. I f you are discharged, you w i l 4.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00426
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) G W E AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD Texas Veterans Commission 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 ( 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ( ( TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I 1 1 -. On or about 29 November 1988, he failed his room inspection, for which he received...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0021
c CONCLUSIONS: %- Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was con2istent with the procedural and subsmive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within theacretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. ated t h i s discharge action a general discharge without consulted w i t h counsel and waived __ - - 3. Execute-the attached acknowledgement and r e t u r n it t o me -,- - --_ -_ - - Suspended A r t...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0039
(Change Discharge to Honorable & Change the RE Code) Issue 1: I would like you to review the case of my discharge from the Air Force on November 8th 1 9 8 9 . Force for a pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, The authority for this action is AFB 39-10, paragraph 5-47b- If my recommendation is approved, your service I am recommending will be characterized as honorable or general- that your service be characterized as general. 2 - My reasons for this action...