RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01074
INDEX CODE: 100
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term,
or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under
the Selected Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed so that he can
join the Reserves.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was on an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) for financial
irresponsibility. This was a temporary situation but he is barred
from entering the Reserves.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 11 Aug 88 for a
period of four years in the grade of airman basic (E-1). On 1 Mar 92,
he reenlisted for a period of four years in the grade of senior airman
(E-4).
On 29 Feb 96, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI
36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service) with an honorable
characterization of service and an RE code of 2X in the grade of
senior airman, effective, and with a date of rank (DOR) of 11 Aug 91.
He was credited with 7 years, 6 months, and 20 days of active service
and 1 year and 8 days of inactive service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this
application and indicated that SRP consideration is normally
documented on an AF Form 418. Unfortunately, this form denying
applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel
record. However, DPPAE confirmed applicant’s RE code “2X” on a 3 Apr
96 “Project Capture” listing. “Project Capture” also revealed
applicant had an UIF at the time of his discharge and this supports a
recommendation of denial of reenlistment. Considering the foregoing,
DPPAE recommends denial of his request for correction of his RE code.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
15 Jun 98 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough review
of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not
persuaded that the RE code issued at the time of his discharge was
either in error or unjust. While the AF Form 418, denying applicant’s
reenlistment, is not documented in his military personnel records, the
Air Force indicated that the applicant had an active UIF at the time
of his discharge which supports a recommendation of denial of
reenlistment. Furthermore, members separated from the Air Force are
furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and
the circumstances of their separation. Applicant’s RE code accurately
defines the circumstances of his separation. In view of the above, we
conclude that no basis exists upon which to recommend favorable action
on the applicant’s request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 4 March 1999, under the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603:
Mr. Douglas J. Heady, Panel Chair
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Member
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Apr 98.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 28 May 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Jun 98.
DOUGLAS J. HEADY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01074
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 15 Jun 98 for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the RE code issued at the time of his discharge was either in error or unjust. While the AF Form 418, denying...
On 1 Dec 97, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service) with an honorable characterization of service in the grade of senior airman with an RE code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter fr applicant,...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01528 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” on the DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty,” be changed to “1J” to allow enlistment into the Hawaii Air National Guard. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02967 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a favorable code. Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in her military personnel record. Therefore, we have no basis on which to make any changes...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...
On 1 November 1983, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force, in the grade of airman (E-2), for a period of four years. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant stated that during his four years on active duty he did receive two Article 15s, and they were both alcohol related and were off duty. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this application and indicated that a review of applicant’s military personnel records revealed an AF Form 418 (Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration), dated 25 Jul 88, denying her reenlistment. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...