Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9701815
Original file (9701815.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
A I R   FORCE BOARE FOR CORRZTTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORC 3F  2RR3CEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

ZL'ZKET  NTJM3ER:  97-01815 

SEARING DESIRED:  NO 

Applicant  requests  that  his  21  A i p i - i l   1994  discharge by  reason  ot 
physical  disqualification  be  c.i?ai-gzd  to  retirement  ( p l a c e d   in  t h e  
Rezir-ed Reserves) .  Applicarlc 

I  s  sx-iission j r 

F'xhi'  L  A. 

The  facts surrounding  applicar-z ' s  separation  f r o x   the Air  Naticrdl 
Guard  and  A i r   Force Reserve  are  m k n o w n   inr.srnucli as  the discharge 
correspondence  is  not  available. 
--LeLllp?:  to  locate  t n e  
appiicant's discharge  correspenderce  -:id  service  medical  r e c o r d s  
tk-ough his  former  unit,  state  he- quarters,  t h e   National  Guard 
aureau,  the  Ail- Reserve  P e r s m : l p l   Zenter, the  lccal  and  National 
Department of Veterans Affa;:  c: 
f f x e s ,   and the applicant have  bee!: 
unsuccessful. 

-,-.- 

 L 

7 .

T h e   appropriate Air  Force  o f f  I C E   ?--aluated applicant Is  request ar,d 
z 1 
p r c m i d e a   ar,  advisory  o p i n i s a  
t h e   Board  recommerLdir~:  t h e  
was 
application  be  denied  (Exhicx  13  . 
The  advisDry  opinir 
forwarded  to  the  applicant  fci  r-eTv-iew and  response  (Exhik:: 
L: 
. 
opinior,  is at Exhibit E .  
Applicaxt's response to t h e   ~ 5 - u - ~ s ~ ~ ; . 7  
applicant's  request  zi1--5  : 
f i r L d   k s G f  f icient  PVII.~ 
LAsctive action.  Based  ,IS 
x n d u c t   of  governmental 

careful  cons id era ti^:^ 
f i f t e i  
axTzilabl3  evidence  of  y-ecoi-3, 
errow  ox  injustice  to  warrant  - - - - - '  
prssumption  of  regularity  1;:  - 
a25  w i t h o u t   evidence  to  the  ~;j;;~:ary,  we  must  assume  Z ~ E L  
acFlicant's discharge was prcp-c: 
directives.  Therefore, we  f:;:-, 
c c r _ s i d e ~ -  this applicatlon. 

in compliance wit).  a p F l - c p l - l a t p  
oasis  ~ j p o n  which  c)  f a ~ , - ; = ~ ~ _ a c , i y  

ZI 
I 

:T 

A c c o r d i n g l y ,   applicant's request  12 5 e n i e d .  
T h e   B o a r d   staff  is  directed  ta  ;X:~TI-I 
fipplicar,:  should  a l s o   be  infcr_--r,ed :::at 
W I
eviaence  which  was  not  reasonabll-  available  at 
apy;li.cat Lon was filed. 

- 
applicant  of  - 
dkC,slsn. 
this  decisior  3 
ar,d 
f;r,c?; 
:w  re.levant 
- ~   only  be  reconsidered  upon  t n ~  presentation  of 
t h e  

t llT,? 

_ -  

1

~ 

3

 

Members  of  the  Board, Mr. Mickael  P. Higgins, Mr.  Steven A. Shcnw, 
and  Ms.  Ann  L. Heidig,  considered  this  application  on  6 October 
1958  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Air  Force  Instruction 
36-2603 ana t h e   governing statme, 1.0 U.S.C. 1552. 

Exhibits: 
A.  Applicant’s DD Form 149 
B .   AvaAable Master Personnel Recgl-3s 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D. 
E.  Applicant I s  Response 
F.  AFBCMR L t r   to Applicant, d t d   5 %ty 

SAF/’MI9k Ltr- Forwarding Advise-;-  Opinion 

98 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800697

    Original file (9800697.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 s i ., I Office of the Assistant Secretary \1 BC'JlR 98-00007 AIR FORCE BOLL-RD FOP- C O k A ? wclu:d bz a u t h o r i z e d to r e t u r n t o Germany 111 a rwpoi-a:-y d u t y (TDY) s t ; i t u s t o complete z s h i p his EX-*' and HHGs to h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r y He was a d v i s e d t h a t k I?-auld n o t be s t a t i o n k F Z i . 3 J and H H G s LC h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r l r a c t i o n s A F B ) aiic -,&:as a d v i s e d t h a t h e would n o t be s t a t l...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00153

    Original file (FD2005-00153.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD r c 1 ) (HGH SRA) .i 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: ;>. DC 20693 DD FORM 293.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00413

    Original file (FD2006-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ............................ A - - - ------a - - 1'YPE UOTH PERSONAL APPEARANCE , GRADE A1 C X APSNRSAN I ----------------- . 3RD FLOOR ANUREWS AFB, MD 20761-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATIONALE C4SE NlJMEER FD-2006-00413 GENERAL: The applicant appeals fbr upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00017

    Original file (FD2006-00017.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Information was extracted from the Legal Review) LOR, LOR, LOC, 21 JAN 04 - 08 SEP 03 - 22 FEB 02 - LOR, LOR, LOR, LOC, LOC, 05 NOV 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 21 AUG 01 - 18 JUN 01 - 14 FEB 01 - Financial irresponsibility. On 5 Jan 04, an investigation revealed L11dAnn i ~&shunurabiy fdcd iv pay iis Military Star Card debt, for which he wj3 given a Lettor 6Fiiphand (LOR), dated 2 1 Jan 04, which was filed in his Personnel Information File (PIF). Direct that the respondent bo discharged from the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01368

    Original file (BC 2013 01368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702842

    Original file (9702842.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    discovered the absence of an AF E'orrr 63 in his records upon receipt of that RIP; however, that ;s irzelevant to The issue that h e i n c u r e d the A D S C . However, we do not find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of the ADSC prior to entering the training. Exhibit B.

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00034

    Original file (FD01-00034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    4 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00034 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Records review revealed that the applicant received an Article 15 for wronghlly using marijuana on or about April 30, 1985 and a second Article 15 for failure to obey a lawhl order while in correctional custody. Today I have prescribe medication Also, there is a letter from my therapist Dr. ------ Please - ATCH 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00307

    Original file (FD2005-00307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - - - I- / Y ~ ~ M E OF SERVICE MF:RIHYH -- AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD .- - -. 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-70U2 1 -.A AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE HEVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE I FD-2005-00307 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorablc, to change thc reason and authority for the discharge, and to changc the reenlist~nent code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00213

    Original file (FD2005-00213.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. The applicant contends that the discharge action was improper because he should have been discharged by Sheppard AFB rather than Keesler AFB. Applicant's Issues.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06956-98

    Original file (06956-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY . Y o u a r e a d v i s e d t h a t r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e c a s e w i l l b e g r a n t e d o n l y u p o n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f n e w a n d m a t e r i a l e v i d e n c e n o t p r e v i o u s l y c o n s i d e r e d b y t h e B o a r d a n d t h e n , o n l y u p o n t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e B o a r d a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e A s s i s t a n t S e c r e t a r y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RECORDS 18 1. ...