AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF P2CCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
C3CKZT NUMBER: 98-0222;
C9GNSEL : NONE
FiEARING DESIRED: NO
Applxant requests his daLe 3 5 rank to the grade of staff
sergeant be corrected from 25 September I996 to 26 May 1996.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force o f f l z e s evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinlons E O the Board recommending the
appllcation be denied (Exh1lxt 2 , . The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant fcz- xe'~iew and response (Exhibit D).
AS of this date, no response kzls Deen received by this office.
After careful conslderatiop CT applicant's request and ti-le
avallahle evldence of record, ~A-C find insufficient evidence of
error or in7ustice to warrant zx-rectlve action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisor:- zpinion appear to be based on t h e
evidence of record and have Z C ' C been rebutted by- applicant.
Absert persuasive evidence appllcdzt was denled rlghts to wnick-
entitled, appropriate replatlcrs were not followed, or
appropriate standards were n o t c=cp?led, we find no basls tc
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request 1s denied.
"he Board staff is directed tc ::::ZLTI
apphcant of this decislo,r_.
~ p p 1 ; c a n t shoGld also be i n f c - r - e x at this decision 1s fina, an2
o n l y b e x-econsldered x ~ c r :I:&
presectatlon of new relevanc
w : l i
evidence which was not reasozsci-- available at the time t h e
app;;catlon was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Rita S. Lscney, M r . Terzy A. -Yonkers,
and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal xnsidered this applicaticn o:_
26 iJanuary 1999 in accordance
the provisions of A i r Force
Instruction 36-2603, and t h e gjz-,?er:-::la s t a t - d t e , IC, U.S.C. 155,;.
7b~::~!:
---\
Panel Chair
: /
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
i3. Avai labie Yaster Personnei R e c o r 2 s
13. Advlsory 3pinlon
9. AFBCMR L t l r Forwarding Advl s s q r l:riclon
The appropriate Air Force o f f i c e evaluated applicarit ‘ s request ana provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit Z The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D ) . T r. 0 additional evaluation was forwarded to applicant f c r re-Jie+; ar,d comment (Exhibit G ’ i . Applicant’s response to the additional evaluation is at Exhibit H. The appropriate After careful consiaeratio~ cf applicant's r e q u e...
Applicant? The appropriate Air Force off ices evaluated applicant I s request and provided advisory oplnions to the Board recommending the application be deniec (Exhibit C). The advisory opir2ions were forwarded to the applicart for review and response (Exhibit D1.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit F , The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, review the application and states that records clearly show the applicant was fit for duty through all the years of his active duty service, and, while having some residual problems relating to his Korean War experiences, he was well and able zo perform his dEties up to the time of h i s retirement, He is being compensated appropriately by the DVA for his service-connected, but not unfitting,...
After his return tc the United States, he inquired about a request for the 30LC ana was promptly informed t h a t the Replacement Depot had no authority to initiate such a request and since he was being processed f o r release from active duty, there was no way such a request could be considered. It is no longer possible to ascertain whether or not the applicant was eligible for an additional decoratiorA for aerial achievements. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: - The AFBCMR Chief Medical Consultant reviewed this application and is of the opinion that no change In the records is warranted and the application should be d e n i m . *at Based on the medical evidence provided, the IPEB found her condition nad stabilized and recommended thar she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired w i t h a 40% disability rating. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated Exhibit D .
discovered the absence of an AF E'orrr 63 in his records upon receipt of that RIP; however, that ;s irzelevant to The issue that h e i n c u r e d the A D S C . However, we do not find his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, sufficiently compelling to conclude that he unwittingly incurred an ADSC for training he would not have accepted had he been aware of the ADSC prior to entering the training. Exhibit B.
A I R FORCE BOARD FOX ZCRRECTION OF :v A C L ~ V E S t a t u s List from t h e K e t i r e d Reser-T,-e ana a s s i g n e d t o ar, a p p r o p r i a t e Cztegory A o r B ~ G X ~ M L A p p h c a n t ’ s submission IS at E x h i b i t A. The appropriste Air Force of?::? ?vallJstec a p p l x a r L t ’ 5 1 - q u e s t ana p r o v i d e d an a d v i s o r y o p i ~ x x zo the EDard -ecommending t h e a p p l i c a t i o n be d e n i e d (ExhibiL : .
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinicn tc the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit Z . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for- review and response (Exhibit Dj. We note that applicant's request pertaining to Block 7A of his DD Form 214 has been corrected administratively; therefore, the only issue before this Board Is his r - e q i s s t that the 40LC be added to the MSM in Block 13.
The facts surrounding applicar-z ' s separation f r o x the Air Naticrdl Guard and A i r Force Reserve are m k n o w n inr.srnucli as the discharge correspondence is not available. T h e appropriate Air Force o f f I C E ?--aluated applicant Is request ar,d z 1 p r c m i d e a ar, advisory o p i n i s a t h e Board recommerLdir~: t h e was application be denied (Exhicx 13 . AvaAable Master Personnel Recgl-3s C. Advisory Opinion D. E. Applicant I s Response F. AFBCMR L t r to Applicant, d t...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOX C J R R E C T I O N O F F ~ I L I T A R Y EiECORDS mmxr; z- PFOCEEDINSS IN THE MATTER OF: IIOCKET NU:vI5 ER : 9 8 - 0 0 8 4 2 C'OUKSEL : NONE 1iE;ARING DESIRED : NO Applicant requests il! T h e amended AF Form 3156, Record of Proceedings of Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment, dated 11 D e c e m D e r 1,987 be placed In his official record, and ( 2 ) t h e appropriate offenses, if his record be corrected ta 1-er-ect any, on the AF Forrri 3370, keto-d of...