Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9701701
Original file (9701701.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
. 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NO:  97-01701 

COUNSEL:  None 

HEARING DESIRED:  No 

OCT  2 8 1m7- 

Applicant  requests  that  he  be  credited  for  the  Combat Medical 
Badge.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 

-b 

The  appropriate  Air  Force office evaluated applicant's request 
and  provided  an  advisory  opinion  to  the  Board  recommending the 
application  be  denied  (Exhibit C).  The  advisory  opinion  was 
forwarded to the  applicant for review and  response  (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

The  application  was  not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available  evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient evidence  of 
error or injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been  rebutted  by  applicant. 
Absent  persuasive evidence applicant was  denied  rights to which 
entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or 
appropriate  standards  were  not  applied,  we  find  no  basis  to 
disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will only be  reconsidered upon  the presentation of new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members of the Board Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Mr. Joseph T. Wagner, 
and  Mr.  Richard  A.  Peterson,  considered  this  application  on 
16 October 1997, in accordance with the provisions of Air  Force 
Instruction 36-2603, and the 

Exhibits : 
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D.  AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 

D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  A I R   FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS  AIR  FORCE  P E R S O N N E L  CENTER 

RANDOLPH  AIR  FORCE  BASE TEXAS 

U.S.  AIR FORCE E- 

1 9 4 7 -  1 9 9 7  

MEMORANDUM FOR  SAFNIBR 

FROM:  HQ AFPCDPSFC 

550 C Street West Ste 35 
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4739 

for Correction of Military Records - 
, 

' 

(SVC# 

Requested Action:  The applicant requests he be credited for the award of the  Combat 

Medical Badge. 

7 

Basis for Request:  The applicant contends in 1943, an Infantry Officer (Major),  name 
I will see that you get the Combat Medical Badge 
e contends when this was said to him he didn't 

which he does not recall stated ' 
for service on the island of Vel1 
worry about the badge authorization being in his records.  He contends at eighteen and in combat 
you don't worry about if the badge is in your records. 

Discussion:  The primary requirement for the Combat Medical Badge is that an 

individual performed Infantry duty and be a member of the Infantry branch.  All individuals 
whose basic branch is other than infantry must have orders for the award. 

Facts:  On  21 
(USARPC) informing 
the lack of authorization for the badge in his record. 

tter was sent from the  US Army Reserve Personnel Center 
s request for the Combat Medical Badge was denied due to 

On 4 Dec 1995 a letter was sent from USARPC to Congressman Sonny Montgomery on 

the same subject.  They  informed the Congressman of what the qualifications were for the 
badge.  They also stated  there was not supporting documentation in the record to support the 
request . 

Recommendation:  After reviewing the members records,  we cannot find any 

supporting documentation in his records to certify his eligibility for this badge. 

R. RANDALL LARSON, SSgt, USAF 
NCOIC,  AF Dress and Appearance 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9700726

    Original file (9700726.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. records be corrected The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Our decisions are based on the documentation provided and opinions of our medical and legal staffs. RECOMMENDATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted and the application should be denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800483

    Original file (9800483.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. Applicant is not eligible for the Air Force Good Conduct Medal because there is a letter of denial in his records, a letter denying him reenlistment because of his conduct, and he had an Un- favorable Information File (UIF). DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR PORCE BASE TEXAS HQ AFPCDPPPRA 550 C Street West Ste 12 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4714 3 March 1998 This is in partial response to your 13 Feb 98 Application for Correction of Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802092

    Original file (9802092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). While on a tour, he stopped the bus for the members to see a herd of camels. This office is responsible for determining Air Force members’ eligibility and entitlement to awards and decorations, and your case was sent to us for review.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800696

    Original file (9800696.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or counsel.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801806

    Original file (9801806.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01806 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Form 214 (Certificate of be corrected to show his listed and the Vietnam Release Vietnam Service Applicant requests that his DD or Discharge From Active Duty) service dates and all schools Medal. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board- -recommending the application be denied...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800638

    Original file (9800638.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD AIR FORCE BOARD FOR OF PROCEEDINGS CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ;gJJ I 3 -sS IN THE MATTER OF: -.-- DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 6 3 8 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 ( C e r t i f i c a t e of Release o r Discharge From Active Duty) be c o r r e c t e d t o r e f l e c t award of t h e Small A r m s Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801012

    Original file (9801012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOA~D FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS . The 'appropriate Air Force 'office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). However should the Board decide to grant relief, the member’s records should be corrected to void his election to add71is child as an SBP beneficiary and refund the portion of the SBP premiums related to the child coverage.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703814

    Original file (9703814.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NOV 3 3 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97- 03814 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No - Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of er or Discharge) be corrected to show overseas service in from January 1957 to December 1958 during his four-year enlistment in the Air Force. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801301

    Original file (9801301.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After consulting counsel, applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf requesting an honorable discharge. He had completed 1 year, 2 months and 15 days and was serving in the grade of airman (E-2) at the time of discharge. Letter to Board for Correction of Air Force Records, RE: Discharge upgrade/DD form 293, November 6, 1997 8.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800933

    Original file (9800933.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Background: During our review we were unable to locate documents that confirmed review his personal file m e r f o r m e d TDYs while assigned overseas.